• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在退伍军人事务医疗中心比较 BMI 对机器人腹股沟疝修补术手术时间和并发症的影响。

Comparison of BMI on operative time and complications of robotic inguinal hernia repair at a VA medical center.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, 333 City Bldg. West, Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.

VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9398-9402. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09259-x. Epub 2022 May 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-022-09259-x
PMID:35543772
Abstract

BACKGROUND

BMI is a risk factor for recurrence and post-operative complications in both open and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach (TEP) repair. Robotic surgery using the transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) is a safe and viable option for inguinal hernia repair (IHR). The objective of this study is to determine how difference in BMI influences rate of operative time, complications, and rate of recurrence in a robotic TAPP IHR.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent robotic inguinal hernia repair between 2012 and 2019 at a Veterans Health Administration facility (N = 304). The operating time, outcomes, and overall morbidity and mortality for robotic IHR were compared between three different BMI Groups. These groups were divided into: "Underweight/Normal Weight" (BMI < 25) n = 102, "Pre-Obese" (BMI 25-29.9) n = 120, and "Obese" (BMI 30 +) n = 82.

RESULTS

The average operating time of a bilateral IHR by BMI group was 83.5, 98.4, and 97.8 min for BMIs < 25, 25-29.9, and 30 +, respectively. Operating time was lower in the Underweight/Normal BMI group compared to the Pre-Obese group (p = 0.006) as well as the Obese group (p = 0.001). For unilateral repair, the average operation length by group was 65.2, 70.9, and 85.6 min for BMIs < 25, 25-29.9, and 30 +, respectively, demonstrating an increased time for Obese compared to Underweight/Normal BMI (p = 0.001) and for Obese compared to Pre-Obese (p = 0.01). Demographic/comorbidity variables were not significantly different, except for a higher percentage of white patients in the Underweight/Normal BMI group compared to the Pre-Obese and Obese groups (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference in complications or recurrence.

CONCLUSION

BMI has a significant impact on the operating time of both unilateral and bilateral robotic hernia repair. Despite this increased operative time, BMI group did not differ significantly in postoperative outcomes or in recurrence rates.

摘要

背景

BMI 是开放式和腹腔镜完全腹膜外途径(TEP)修复术后复发和术后并发症的一个风险因素。使用经腹腔前腹膜途径(TAPP)的机器人手术是腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)的一种安全可行的选择。本研究的目的是确定 BMI 的差异如何影响机器人 TAPP IHR 的手术时间、并发症和复发率。

方法

我们对 2012 年至 2019 年在退伍军人健康管理局设施接受机器人腹股沟疝修补术的患者进行了回顾性分析(N=304)。比较了三组不同 BMI 组的机器人 IHR 的手术时间、结果以及总体发病率和死亡率。这些组分为:“体重不足/正常体重”(BMI<25)n=102、“超重”(BMI 25-29.9)n=120 和“肥胖”(BMI 30+)n=82。

结果

BMI 组双侧 IHR 的平均手术时间分别为 83.5、98.4 和 97.8 分钟,BMI 值分别为<25、25-29.9 和 30+。与超重组(p=0.006)和肥胖组(p=0.001)相比,体重不足/正常体重组的手术时间更短。对于单侧修复,各组的平均手术时间分别为 65.2、70.9 和 85.6 分钟,BMI 值分别为<25、25-29.9 和 30+,与体重不足/正常体重组相比,肥胖组的手术时间明显延长(p=0.001),与超重组相比,肥胖组的手术时间也明显延长(p=0.01)。除体重不足/正常体重组的白人患者比例明显高于超重组和肥胖组(p=0.02 和 p=0.0003)外,其他人口统计学/合并症变量无明显差异。

结论

BMI 对单侧和双侧机器人疝修补术的手术时间有显著影响。尽管手术时间延长,但 BMI 组在术后结果或复发率方面无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of BMI on operative time and complications of robotic inguinal hernia repair at a VA medical center.在退伍军人事务医疗中心比较 BMI 对机器人腹股沟疝修补术手术时间和并发症的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9398-9402. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09259-x. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Transition from Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair to Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Review of a Single Surgeon's Experience.从腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术过渡到机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术:单中心回顾性研究
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2251-2257. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3998-3.
3
Posterior mesh inguinal hernia repairs: a propensity score matched analysis of laparoscopic and robotic versus open approaches.后入路腹股沟疝修补术:腹腔镜和机器人与开放手术的倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02680-0. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
4
Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal vs robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: Assessment of short- and long-term outcomes.腹腔镜完全腹膜外与机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术:短期和长期结果评估。
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Aug;16(4):e2111. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2111. Epub 2020 May 3.
5
Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: retrospective comparison of TEP and TAPP procedures in a tertiary referral center.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:三级转诊中心 TEP 和 TAPP 手术的回顾性比较。
Minerva Chir. 2020 Oct;75(5):279-285. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08518-1.
6
Single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.单孔与多孔腹腔镜及机器人腹股沟疝修补术:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):530-544. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11321-9. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
7
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):239-44. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
8
Early outcomes of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in obese patients: a multi-institutional, retrospective study.机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术治疗肥胖患者的早期结果:一项多机构、回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):229-235. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5665-z. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
Does robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) hernia repair facilitate contralateral investigation and repair without compromising patient morbidity?机器人辅助经腹腹膜前(R-TAPP)疝修补术能否在不增加患者发病率的情况下便于对侧检查和修补?
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):713-718. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0815-4. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
Open vs. robot-assisted preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Are they truly clinically different?开放式与机器人辅助腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术。它们在临床上真的有区别吗?
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1355-1363. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03050-8. Epub 2024 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Lightweight versus heavyweight synthetic mesh for inguinal hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝修补的轻质与重质合成补片
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 30;6(6):CD015553. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015553.
2
In-hospital outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in obese patients: a national inpatient sample analysis 2005-2020.肥胖患者机器人与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的院内结局:2005 - 2020年全国住院患者样本分析
Hernia. 2025 Mar 25;29(1):122. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03313-y.
3
Impact of Body Mass Index on Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Liposculpture in Private Practice.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between non-obese and obese patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis.非肥胖患者与肥胖患者行机器人腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期结局比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2022 Aug;26(4):1033-1039. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02433-5. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? Systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人腹股沟疝修补术:技术是否正在接管?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):509-519. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01965-1. Epub 2019 May 15.
3
First 100 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs at a Veterans Affairs hospital.
体重指数对私人诊所接受脂肪雕塑患者治疗结果的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Nov 20;12(11):e6291. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006291. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜治疗小儿腹股沟疝的临床疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):5155-5167. doi: 10.62347/VGGJ1398. eCollection 2024.
5
Postoperative outcomes among patients evaluated via telemedicine-based preoperative consultations for inguinal hernia care.基于远程医疗的腹股沟疝治疗术前咨询评估的患者的术后结果。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2151-2157. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03095-9. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
6
Critical values for body mass index related to morbidity in high-volume low-complexity general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高容量低复杂性普通外科中与发病率相关的体重指数临界值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Apr;107(4):242-252. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0057. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
7
Association between Body Mass Index and Early Renal Function after Kidney Transplantation: Observational and Mendelian Randomization Study.体重指数与肾移植后早期肾功能的关系:观察性和孟德尔随机化研究。
Obes Facts. 2024;17(5):459-472. doi: 10.1159/000539339. Epub 2024 May 15.
8
A Comprehensive Review of Inguinal Hernia Occurrence in Obese Individuals.肥胖个体腹股沟疝发生情况的综合综述
Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Dec;18(4):692-698. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.4.692.
一家退伍军人事务医院连续进行的首例100例机器人腹股沟疝修补手术。
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):699-704. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0812-7. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes.开放手术与机器人辅助经腹腹膜前(R-TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术:临床结局的多中心匹配分析
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):827-836. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1769-1. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
5
Outcomes of surgery on patients with a clinically inapparent inguinal hernia as diagnosed by ultrasonography.经超声检查诊断为临床隐匿性腹股沟疝患者的手术结果。
Hernia. 2018 Jun;22(3):525-531. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1744-x. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
6
Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair.机器人腹股沟疝修补术
Am Surg. 2017 Dec 1;83(12):1418-1421.
7
Factors associated with hernia recurrence after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: a 2-year prospective cohort study.腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术治疗腹股沟疝后疝复发的相关因素:一项为期2年的前瞻性队列研究。
Hernia. 2017 Oct;21(5):729-735. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1634-7. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
8
Early outcomes of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in obese patients: a multi-institutional, retrospective study.机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术治疗肥胖患者的早期结果:一项多机构、回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):229-235. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5665-z. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs: a review of the NSQIP dataset.烟草使用对腹腔镜和开放腹股沟疝修补术结局的影响:基于国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据集的综述
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):917-921. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5055-y. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
10
Open versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs: defining the ideal BMI to reduce complications.开放手术与腹腔镜下单侧腹股沟疝修补术:确定降低并发症的理想体重指数
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):206-214. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4958-y. Epub 2016 May 18.