Goins Allie E, Smeltz Alan, Ramm Cassandra, Strassle Paula D, Teeter Emily G, Vavalle John P, Kolarczyk Lavinia
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
University of North Carolina, Department of Anesthesiology, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Aug;32(4):1570-1577. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.12.018. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
Investigate the effect of volatile anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia on the incidence of postoperative delirium and length of stay in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement under general anesthesia.
Retrospective study.
Single institution, academic medical center.
Adult patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement under general anesthesia between November 2014 and February 2017.
This study was not an interventional study.
Electronic medical records were reviewed for intraoperative maintenance anesthetic technique, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, 30-day mortality, and documentation of delirium. Delirium was defined as either 1) positive Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit score or 2) documentation of delirium or confusion by the care team within 2 days of surgery. Overall, 116 patients were included and 84 (72%) received a total intravenous anesthesia technique. Twenty-three patients (20%) had postoperative delirium. The odds of delirium were lower in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with total intravenous anesthesia, compared with volatile anesthesia, even after adjusting for procedure approach (odds ratio 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.06, 0.79, p = 0.02). No significant difference in hospital or intensive care unit length of stay was seen after adjusting for procedural characteristics.
While postoperative delirium is a complex and multifactorial problem, the type of general anesthetic maintenance may contribute to the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and total intravenous anesthesia may be an attractive alternative to volatile-based general anesthesia maintenance.
研究全身麻醉下经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中,挥发性麻醉与全静脉麻醉对术后谵妄发生率及住院时间的影响。
回顾性研究。
单一机构,学术医疗中心。
2014年11月至2017年2月期间在全身麻醉下接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的成年患者。
本研究并非干预性研究。
查阅电子病历以获取术中维持麻醉技术、住院及重症监护病房住院时间、30天死亡率和谵妄记录。谵妄定义为:1)重症监护病房意识模糊评估方法评分呈阳性;或2)护理团队在术后2天内记录有谵妄或意识模糊。总体而言,共纳入116例患者,其中84例(72%)采用全静脉麻醉技术。23例患者(20%)发生术后谵妄。与挥发性麻醉相比,接受全静脉麻醉的经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者发生谵妄的几率更低,即使在调整手术方式后也是如此(比值比0.22,95%置信区间0.06, 0.79,p = 0.02)。在调整手术特征后,住院或重症监护病房住院时间未见显著差异。
虽然术后谵妄是一个复杂的多因素问题,但全身麻醉维持的类型可能会影响经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者术后谵妄的发生率,全静脉麻醉可能是基于挥发性药物的全身麻醉维持的一个有吸引力的替代方案。