UGA Concussion Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA; Matthew Gfeller Sport-Related Traumatic Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC; Human Movement Science Curriculum, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Human Movement Science Curriculum, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 May;99(5):880-886. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
To compare movement reaction time and joint kinematics between athletes with recent concussion and matched control recreational athletes during 3 functional tasks.
Cross-sectional.
Laboratory.
College-aged recreational athletes (N=30) comprising 2 groups (15 participants each): (1) recent concussion group (median time since concussion, 126d; range, 28-432d) and (2) age- and sex-matched control group with no recent concussions.
We investigated movement reaction time and joint kinematics during 3 tasks: (1) jump landing, (2) anticipated cut, and (3) unanticipated cut.
Reaction time and reaction time cost (jump landing reaction time-cut reaction time/jump landing reaction time×100%), along with trunk, hip, and knee joint angles in the sagittal and frontal planes at initial ground contact.
There were no reaction time between-group differences, but the control group displayed improved reaction time cost (10.7%) during anticipated cutting compared with the concussed group (0.8%; P=.030). The control group displayed less trunk flexion than the concussed group during the nondominant anticipated cut (5.1° difference; P=.022). There were no other kinematic between-group differences (P≥.079).
We observed subtle reaction time and kinematic differences between individuals with recent concussion and those without concussion more than a month after return to activity after concussion. The clinical interpretation of these findings remains unclear, but may have future implications for postconcussion management and rehabilitation.
比较近期脑震荡运动员和匹配的休闲运动员在 3 项功能性任务中的运动反应时间和关节运动学。
横断面。
实验室。
大学生休闲运动员(N=30),分为 2 组(每组 15 名参与者):(1)近期脑震荡组(脑震荡后中位数时间,126d;范围,28-432d)和(2)无近期脑震荡且年龄和性别匹配的对照组。
我们研究了 3 项任务中的运动反应时间和关节运动学:(1)跳跃着陆,(2)预期切割,(3)意外切割。
反应时间和反应时间成本(跳跃着陆反应时间-切割反应时间/跳跃着陆反应时间×100%),以及初始地面接触时矢状面和额状面的躯干、髋关节和膝关节角度。
组间无反应时间差异,但与脑震荡组相比,对照组在预期切割时反应时间成本提高(10.7%;P=.030)。与脑震荡组相比,对照组在非优势侧预期切割时躯干屈曲度较小(5.1°差异;P=.022)。组间无其他运动学差异(P≥.079)。
我们观察到近期脑震荡患者和超过脑震荡后活动恢复一个月后无脑震荡患者之间存在微妙的反应时间和运动学差异。这些发现的临床解释尚不清楚,但可能对脑震荡后的管理和康复有未来的影响。