Moran Ryan N, Grooms Dustin R
Athletic Training Research Laboratory, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens.
J Athl Train. 2025 Jan 1;60(1):3-10. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0369.24.
Recent epidemiological data have indicated a potential connection between sport-related concussion (SRC) and elevated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk. Limited research exists in which authors have quantified cognitive and motor outcome measures between SRC and ACL injury history.
To examine the individual and combined effects of a history of SRC and ACL injury and reconstruction (ACLR) on neurocognitive and neuromechanical function.
Cross-sectional study.
Research laboratory.
Forty-seven recreationally active college individuals with either an injury history of SRC (n = 12), ACLR (n = 12), combination of SRC + ACLR (n = 11), or uninjured controls (n = 12).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants completed a neurological battery using the C3 Logix application and TRAZER system for neuromechanical reaction time (RT). C3 Logix subtests consisted of the Trail Making Test (TMT) A, B, and B - A; simple and choice RT; and processing speed. TRAZER subtests consisted of simple, Flanker-task, and Stroop-task RT. Participants were categorized into 3 group comparisons of either (i) SRC, ACLR, SRC + ACLR, and controls, (ii) any or no SRC overall, or (iii) any or no ACLR overall.
No differences were demonstrated between SRC, ACLR, SRC + ACLR, and controls on TMT (P = .07-.14), neurocognitive (P = .14-.93), or neuromechanical (P = .64-.99) performance. Those with any SRC had slower TMT B - A times (P = .03), while those with any ACLR had slower TMT A (P = .02) times than those with no ACLR. No differences were noted for the TRAZER simple, Flanker, or Stroop RT for any or no SRC and ACLR groups.
College students with a combined effect of SRC and ACLR did not differ from other groups on neurocognition and neuromechanical RT. Individuals with a history of SRC or ACLR had a worse TMT, leading to inquiry about potential long-term neurological deficits, despite no differences in those with a combined history.
近期的流行病学数据表明,与运动相关的脑震荡(SRC)和前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤风险升高之间可能存在联系。目前仅有有限的研究对SRC病史和ACL损伤病史之间的认知和运动结果指标进行了量化。
研究SRC病史、ACL损伤及重建(ACLR)对神经认知和神经力学功能的个体及综合影响。
横断面研究。
研究实验室。
47名有娱乐活动习惯的大学生,其中有SRC损伤病史者(n = 12),有ACLR病史者(n = 12),有SRC + ACLR联合病史者(n = 11),以及未受伤的对照组(n = 12)。
参与者使用C3 Logix应用程序和TRAZER系统完成一套神经学测试,以测量神经力学反应时间(RT)。C3 Logix子测试包括连线测验(TMT)A、B和B - A;简单反应时和选择反应时;以及处理速度。TRAZER子测试包括简单反应时、侧翼任务反应时和斯特鲁普任务反应时。参与者被分为3组进行比较:(i)SRC组、ACLR组、SRC + ACLR组和对照组;(ii)总体上有或无SRC组;(iii)总体上有或无ACLR组。
在TMT(P = 0.07 - 0.14)、神经认知(P = 0.14 - 0.93)或神经力学(P = 0.64 - 0.99)表现方面,SRC组、ACLR组、SRC + ACLR组和对照组之间未显示出差异。有任何SRC病史者的TMT B - A时间较慢(P = 0.03),而有任何ACLR病史者的TMT A时间比无ACLR病史者慢(P = 0.02)。对于有或无SRC和ACLR病史的组,在TRAZER简单反应时、侧翼任务反应时或斯特鲁普任务反应时方面未发现差异。
有SRC和ACLR联合影响的大学生在神经认知和神经力学反应时间方面与其他组没有差异。有SRC或ACLR病史的个体TMT表现较差,这引发了对潜在长期神经功能缺损的探究,尽管有联合病史者之间没有差异。