Suppr超能文献

远程医疗自我管理和教育对多发性硬化症成人治疗结果的调节作用:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。

Moderators of Treatment Outcomes After Telehealth Self-Management and Education in Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Multiple Sclerosis Center of Excellence - West, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jul;99(7):1265-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.012. Epub 2018 Jan 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine moderators of treatment effects in a randomized controlled trial comparing a telehealth self-management intervention with a telehealth multiple sclerosis (MS) education intervention for fatigue, pain, and mood in adults with MS.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Community.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with MS and chronic fatigue, chronic pain, and/or moderate depressive symptoms (N=163) recruited from across the United States.

INTERVENTIONS

Two 8-week, telephone-delivered symptom interventions delivered 1:1: a self-management intervention (n=75) and an MS education intervention (n=88).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures were fatigue impact pain interference, and depressive symptom severity assessed at baseline and posttreatment. Potential moderators of treatment effects assessed at baseline were demographics (age, sex, and education), clinical characteristics (disease duration and disability severity), symptoms (perceived cognitive impairment and pain intensity), baseline levels of the treatment outcomes (pain interference, fatigue impact and depressive symptom severity), and cognitive behavioral factors (pain catastrophizing, fatigue catastrophizing, self-efficacy, and patient activation).

RESULTS

Moderation analyses found significant moderation for fatigue impact but not for pain intensity or depressive symptom severity. Baseline patient activation interacted with treatment group to predict fatigue impact at posttreatment (P=.049). Among participants with high baseline patient activation, the self-management group reported significantly less fatigue at posttreatment than the education group. No other variables moderated the study outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

At the group level, participants responded to both interventions, regardless of disease characteristics, demographics, symptom levels, and cognitive behavioral factors. Self-management and education are both potentially beneficial symptom treatments that may be recommended to individuals with MS and chronic pain, fatigue, and/or depressive symptoms.

摘要

目的

在一项比较远程医疗自我管理干预与远程医疗多发性硬化症(MS)教育干预对成人 MS 患者疲劳、疼痛和情绪的随机对照试验中,检验治疗效果的调节因素。

设计

单盲随机对照试验的二次分析。

地点

社区。

参与者

从美国各地招募的患有 MS 且伴有慢性疲劳、慢性疼痛和/或中度抑郁症状的成年人(N=163)。

干预措施

两种 8 周、电话提供的症状干预措施,1:1 实施:自我管理干预(n=75)和 MS 教育干预(n=88)。

主要观察指标

基线和治疗后评估的疲劳影响疼痛干扰和抑郁症状严重程度。在基线评估的治疗效果的潜在调节因素包括人口统计学因素(年龄、性别和教育程度)、临床特征(疾病持续时间和残疾严重程度)、症状(感知认知障碍和疼痛强度)、治疗结局的基线水平(疼痛干扰、疲劳影响和抑郁症状严重程度)以及认知行为因素(疼痛灾难化、疲劳灾难化、自我效能和患者激活)。

结果

调节分析发现疲劳影响有显著的调节作用,但疼痛强度和抑郁症状严重程度没有调节作用。基线患者激活与治疗组相互作用,预测治疗后疲劳影响(P=.049)。在基线患者激活较高的参与者中,自我管理组在治疗后报告的疲劳明显少于教育组。没有其他变量调节研究结果。

结论

在群体水平上,无论疾病特征、人口统计学、症状水平和认知行为因素如何,参与者对两种干预措施都有反应。自我管理和教育都是潜在有益的症状治疗方法,可推荐给患有 MS 及慢性疼痛、疲劳和/或抑郁症状的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验