Guerra Federico, Stronati Giulia, Capucci Alessandro
a Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic , Marche Polytechnic University, University Hospital "Ospedali Riuniti" , Ancona , Italy.
b Buckinghamshire Health, NHS Trust , Aylesbury , UK.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Mar;16(3):163-173. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1429914. Epub 2018 Jan 21.
Procedural sedation is of paramount importance for a plethora of electrophysiological procedures. From electrical cardioversion to electrophysiology studies, device implantations, and catheter ablations, intraprocedural sedation and anesthesia have a pivotal role in allowing procedural success while ensuring patient safety and avoiding discomfort. Areas covered: The present review will discuss the current state-of-the-art in sedation and anesthesia during electrical cardioversion, cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, catheter ablation and electrophysiology studies. Specific information will be provided for each procedure in order to reach the core of this important clinical issue, and specific protocols will be compared. The main pro-arrhythmic and anti-arrhythmic effects of the most commonly used sedatives will also be discussed. Expert commentary: According to much recent evidence, the cardiologist can be the only person responsible for sedation administration in many settings, highlighting few safety issues associated with the absence of a dedicated anesthesiologist thus a concomitant reduction in costs. However, many concerns have been raised in allowing non-anesthesiologists to manage sedatives, as adverse events, while rare, could have catastrophic consequences. The present paper will highlight when a cardiologist-directed sedation is considered safe, how it should be performed, and the pros and cons related to this strategy.
对于大量的电生理手术而言,程序性镇静至关重要。从心脏电复律到电生理检查、器械植入以及导管消融,术中镇静和麻醉在确保手术成功、保障患者安全并避免不适方面发挥着关键作用。涵盖领域:本综述将探讨心脏电复律、心脏植入式电子器械植入、导管消融及电生理检查期间镇静和麻醉的当前技术水平。将针对每种手术提供具体信息,以触及这一重要临床问题的核心,并比较具体方案。还将讨论最常用镇静剂的主要促心律失常和抗心律失常作用。专家评论:根据近期的诸多证据,在许多情况下,心脏病专家可能是唯一负责给予镇静的人员,这凸显了因没有专职麻醉医生而产生的少数安全问题,从而降低了成本。然而,让非麻醉医生管理镇静剂引发了诸多担忧,因为不良事件虽罕见,但可能产生灾难性后果。本文将着重阐述何时心脏病专家主导的镇静被视为安全、应如何实施以及与该策略相关的利弊。