Li Bao-Dong, Cui Jing-Jun, Song Jia, Qi Ce, Ma Pei-Feng, Wang Ya-Rong, Bai Jing
Department of Neurology, Hebei Province Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Cangzhou, China.
Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;45(1):119-130. doi: 10.1159/000486252. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: A network meta-analysis is used to compare the efficacy of ropinirole, rasagiline, rotigotine, entacapone, apomorphine, pramipexole, sumanirole, bromocriptine, piribedil and levodopa, with placebo as a control, for non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD).
PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from their establishment dates up to January 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of the above ten drugs on the non-motor symptoms of PD. A network meta-analysis combined the evidence from direct comparisons and indirect comparisons and evaluated the pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) values and surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA). The network meta-analysis included 21 RCTs.
The analysis results indicated that, using the United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III, the efficacies of placebo, ropinirole, rasagiline, rotigotine, entacapone, pramipexole, sumanirole and levodopa in treating PD were lower than that of apomorphine (WMD = -10.90, 95% CI = -16.12∼-5.48; WMD = -11.85, 95% CI = -17.31∼-6.16; WMD = -11.15, 95% CI = -16.64∼-5.04; WMD = -11.70, 95% CI = -16.98∼-5.60; WMD = -11.04, 95% CI = -16.97∼-5.34; WMD = -13.27, 95% CI = -19.22∼-7.40; WMD = -10.25, 95% CI = -15.66∼-4.32; and WMD = -11.60, 95% CI = -17.89∼-5.57, respectively). Treatment with ropinirole, rasagiline, rotigotine, entacapone, pramipexole, sumanirole, bromocriptine, piribedil or levodopa, with placebo as a control, on PD exhibited no significant differences on PD symptoms when the UPDRS II was used for evaluation. Moreover, using the UPDRS III, the SUCRA values indicated that a pomorphine had the best efficacy on the non-motor symptoms of PD (99.0%). Using the UPDRS II, the SUCRA values for ropinirole, rasagiline, rotigotine, entacapone, pramipexole, sumanirole, bromocriptine, piribedil and levodopa treatments, with placebo as a control, indicated that bromocriptine showed the best efficacy on the non-motor symptoms of PD (75.6%).
Among ropinirole, rasagiline, rotigotine, entacapone, apomorphine, pramipexole, sumanirole, bromocriptine, piribedil and levodopa, with placebo as a control, apomorphine may be the most efficacious drug for therapy in treating the non-motor symptoms of PD.
背景/目的:进行一项网状Meta分析,以比较罗匹尼罗、雷沙吉兰、罗替戈汀、恩他卡朋、阿扑吗啡、普拉克索、舒马普坦、溴隐亭、吡贝地尔和左旋多巴与安慰剂对照治疗帕金森病(PD)非运动症状的疗效。
检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆自建库至2017年1月的随机对照试验(RCT),以研究上述十种药物对PD非运动症状的疗效。网状Meta分析结合直接比较和间接比较的证据,评估合并加权均数差(WMD)值和累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)。该网状Meta分析纳入了21项RCT。
分析结果表明,使用统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)III时,安慰剂、罗匹尼罗、雷沙吉兰、罗替戈汀、恩他卡朋、普拉克索、舒马普坦和左旋多巴治疗PD的疗效低于阿扑吗啡(WMD分别为=-10.90,95%CI=-16.12∼-5.48;WMD=-11.85,95%CI=-17.31∼-6.16;WMD=-11.15,95%CI=-16.64∼-5.04;WMD=-11.70,95%CI=-16.98∼-5.60;WMD=-11.04,95%CI=-16.97∼-5.34;WMD=-13.27,95%CI=-19.22∼-7.40;WMD=-10.25,95%CI=-15.66∼-4.32;WMD=-11.60,95%CI=-17.89∼-5.57)。以安慰剂为对照,使用UPDRS II评估时,罗匹尼罗、雷沙吉兰、罗替戈汀、恩他卡朋、普拉克索、舒马普坦、溴隐亭、吡贝地尔或左旋多巴治疗PD时,在PD症状方面无显著差异。此外,使用UPDRS III时,SUCRA值表明阿扑吗啡对PD非运动症状的疗效最佳(99.0%)。使用UPDRS II时,以安慰剂为对照,罗匹尼罗、雷沙吉兰、罗替戈汀、恩他卡朋、普拉克索、舒马普坦、溴隐亭、吡贝地尔和左旋多巴治疗的SUCRA值表明,溴隐亭对PD非运动症状的疗效最佳(75.6%)。
在罗匹尼罗、雷沙吉兰、罗替戈汀、恩他卡朋、阿扑吗啡、普拉克索、舒马普坦、溴隐亭、吡贝地尔和左旋多巴中,以安慰剂为对照,阿扑吗啡可能是治疗PD非运动症状最有效的药物。