Arazpour Mokhtar, Gholami Milad, Bahramizadeh Mahmood, Sharifi Guive, Bani Monireh Ahmadi
Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science, Tehran, Iran.
Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Department of Neurosurgery, Tehran, Iran.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017 Summer;23(3):256-262. doi: 10.1310/sci16-00016. Epub 2017 May 4.
Studies collectively imply that the reciprocal link has no effect on walking when using reciprocating gait orthoses (RGOs). There may be differences between the 2 configurations of the RGO (eg, isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis [IRGO] and IRGO without reciprocating link), but the specific benefits and problems encountered in their use must be understood. To highlight more evidence for the mechanical function of the reciprocal link in RGOs used for walking by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Nine people with SCI participated in this study. Gait analysis was performed in 2 conditions (walking with IRGO and walking with IRGO without reciprocating link) in a random order. The Vicon digital capture system was used to obtain kinematic data. There were significant differences between each orthotic configuration in terms of speed of walking ( = .029), step length ( = .048), hip joint range of motion (ROM) ( ≤ .001), and lateral and vertical compensatory motions ( ≤ .001). There was no significant difference between each orthotic configuration in cadence ( = .162). The reciprocating link in IRGO improved the walking parameters in SCI patients.
多项研究共同表明,在使用往复式步态矫形器(RGO)时,这种往复连接对行走没有影响。RGO的两种配置(例如,等中心往复式步态矫形器[IRGO]和没有往复连接的IRGO)之间可能存在差异,但必须了解它们在使用中遇到的具体益处和问题。为了突出更多关于脊髓损伤(SCI)患者使用的RGO中往复连接的机械功能的证据。9名SCI患者参与了这项研究。以随机顺序在两种条件下(使用IRGO行走和使用没有往复连接的IRGO行走)进行步态分析。使用Vicon数字采集系统获取运动学数据。在行走速度(P = .029)、步长(P = .048)、髋关节活动范围(ROM)(P≤.001)以及横向和垂直补偿运动(P≤.001)方面,每种矫形器配置之间存在显著差异。在步频方面,每种矫形器配置之间没有显著差异(P = .162)。IRGO中的往复连接改善了SCI患者的行走参数。