Zohar Ada H, Eilat Tamar, Amitai Maya, Taler Michal, Bari Romi, Chen Alon, Apter Alan, Weizman Avraham, Fennig Silvana
Graduate Program in Clinical Psychology, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel.
Graduate Psychology in Clinical Psychology, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel.
PeerJ. 2018 Jan 10;6:e4240. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4240. eCollection 2018.
Not enough is known about predicting therapeutic response to serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors, and specifically to fluoxetine. This exploratory study used psychological and biological markers for (retrospective) prediction of treatment-response to fluoxetine in depressed and/or anxious adolescents.
Forty-one consecutive adolescent outpatients with a primary diagnosis of severe affective and/or anxiety disorders were assessed and treated with an open-label 8-week trial of fluoxetine. Type D personality was assessed with the 14-item questionnaire, the DS14. In addition, TNFα, IL-6, and IL-1b were measured pre- and post-treatment.
There was an elevation of Type D personality in patients, compared to the adolescent population rate. Post-treatment, 44% of patients were classified as non-responders; the relative risk of non-response for Type D personality patients was 2.8. Binary logistic regression predicting response vs. non-response showed a contribution of initial TNFα levels as well as Type D personality to non-response.
In this exploratory study, the most significant contributor to non-response was Type D personality. However, the measurement of Type D was not prospective, and thus may be confounded with psychiatric morbidity. The measurement of personality in psychiatric settings may contribute to the understanding of treatment response and have clinical utility.
对于预测血清素特异性再摄取抑制剂,尤其是氟西汀的治疗反应,我们了解得还不够。这项探索性研究使用心理和生物学标志物(进行回顾性研究)来预测抑郁和/或焦虑青少年对氟西汀的治疗反应。
对41名连续的门诊青少年患者进行评估,这些患者的主要诊断为重度情感和/或焦虑障碍,并接受了为期8周的氟西汀开放标签试验治疗。使用14项问卷DS14评估D型人格。此外,在治疗前后测量肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和白细胞介素-1β(IL-1b)。
与青少年总体患病率相比,患者中D型人格有所增加。治疗后,44%的患者被归类为无反应者;D型人格患者无反应的相对风险为2.8。预测反应与无反应的二元逻辑回归显示,初始TNFα水平以及D型人格对无反应有影响。
在这项探索性研究中,对无反应影响最大的因素是D型人格。然而,D型人格的测量并非前瞻性的,因此可能与精神疾病混淆。在精神科环境中测量人格可能有助于理解治疗反应并具有临床实用性。