Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 17;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0464-8.
The impracticalities and comparative expense of carrying out a clinical assessment is an obstacle in many large epidemiological studies. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a series of electronic self-reported line drawing instruments based on the modified Beighton scoring system for the assessment of self-reported generalised joint hypermobility.
Five sets of line drawings were created to depict the 9-point Beighton score criteria. Each instrument consisted of an explanatory question whereby participants were asked to select the line drawing which best represented their joints. Fifty participants completed the self-report online instrument on two occasions, before attending a clinical assessment. A blinded expert clinical observer then assessed participants' on two occasions, using a standardised goniometry measurement protocol. Validity of the instrument was assessed by participant-observer agreement and reliability by participant repeatability and observer repeatability using unweighted Cohen's kappa (k). Validity and reliability were assessed for each item in the self-reported instrument separately, and for the sum of the total scores. An aggregate score for generalised joint hypermobility was determined based on a Beighton score of 4 or more out of 9.
Observer-repeatability between the two clinical assessments demonstrated perfect agreement (k 1.00; 95% CI 1.00, 1.00). Self-reported participant-repeatability was lower but it was still excellent (k 0.91; 95% CI 0.74, 1.00). The participant-observer agreement was excellent (k 0.96; 95% CI 0.87, 1.00). Validity was excellent for the self-report instrument, with a good sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.81, 0.91) and excellent specificity of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98, 1.00).
The self-reported instrument provides a valid and reliable assessment of the presence of generalised joint hypermobility and may have practical use in epidemiological studies.
在许多大型流行病学研究中,进行临床评估的不切实际和相对昂贵是一个障碍。本研究的目的是开发和验证一系列基于改良 Beighton 评分系统的电子自我报告线图仪器,用于评估自我报告的全身性关节过度活动。
创建了五组线图来描绘 9 分 Beighton 评分标准。每个仪器都包含一个解释性问题,参与者被要求从中选择最能代表他们关节的线图。50 名参与者两次在线完成自我报告仪器,然后再进行临床评估。然后,一位盲法临床专家观察员两次使用标准化的关节角度测量协议评估参与者。仪器的有效性通过参与者-观察者一致性来评估,可靠性通过参与者重复性和观察者重复性来评估,使用未加权的 Cohen's kappa(k)。分别评估自我报告仪器中每个项目的有效性和可靠性,以及总分的可靠性。全身性关节过度活动的综合评分基于 Beighton 评分 9 分中的 4 分或以上。
两次临床评估之间的观察者重复性显示出完美的一致性(k 1.00;95%CI 1.00,1.00)。自我报告的参与者重复性虽然较低,但仍然是极好的(k 0.91;95%CI 0.74,1.00)。参与者-观察者一致性极好(k 0.96;95%CI 0.87,1.00)。自我报告仪器的有效性极好,具有良好的敏感性 0.87(95%CI 0.81,0.91)和极好的特异性 0.99(95%CI 0.98,1.00)。
自我报告仪器可对全身性关节过度活动的存在进行有效且可靠的评估,并且可能在流行病学研究中具有实际用途。