Suppr超能文献

回顾性评估社会心理工作条件,作为预测老年工人前瞻性评估的病假和残疾抚恤金的指标。

Retrospectively assessed psychosocial working conditions as predictors of prospectively assessed sickness absence and disability pension among older workers.

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 17;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5047-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim was to explore the association between retrospectively assessed psychosocial working conditions during working life and prospectively assessed risk of sickness absence and disability pension among older workers.

METHODS

The prospective risk of register-based long-term sickness absence (LTSA) and disability pension was estimated from exposure to 12 different psychosocial work characteristics during working life among 5076 older workers from the CAMB cohort (Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank). Analyses were censored for competing events and adjusted for age, gender, physical work environment, lifestyle, education, and prior LTSA.

RESULTS

LTSA was predicted by high levels of cognitive demands (HR 1.31 (95% CI 1.10-1.56)), high levels of emotional demands (HR 1.26 (95% CI 1.07-1.48)), low levels of influence at work (HR 1.30 (95% CI 1.03-1.64)), and high levels of role conflicts (HR 1.34 (95% CI 1.09-1.65)). Disability pension was predicted by low levels of influence at work (HR 2.73 (95% CI 1.49-5.00)) and low levels of recognition from management (HR 2.04 (95% CI 1.14-3.67)).

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study found that retrospectively assessed high cognitive demands, high and medium emotional demands, low influence at work, low recognition from management, medium role clarity, and high role conflicts predicted LTSA and/or disability pension.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨工作生涯中回顾性评估的心理社会工作条件与老年工作者前瞻性评估的病假和残疾养老金风险之间的关联。

方法

在 CAMB 队列(哥本哈根老龄化和中年生物库)的 5076 名老年工人中,根据工作生涯中 12 种不同心理社会工作特征的暴露情况,估计了基于登记的长期病假(LTSA)和残疾养老金的前瞻性风险。分析对竞争事件进行了删失,并针对年龄、性别、体力工作环境、生活方式、教育和既往 LTSA 进行了调整。

结果

LTSA 由高认知需求(HR 1.31(95%CI 1.10-1.56))、高情绪需求(HR 1.26(95%CI 1.07-1.48))、工作影响力低(HR 1.30(95%CI 1.03-1.64))和角色冲突高(HR 1.34(95%CI 1.09-1.65))预测。残疾养老金由工作影响力低(HR 2.73(95%CI 1.49-5.00))和管理层认可低(HR 2.04(95%CI 1.14-3.67))预测。

结论

这项探索性研究发现,回顾性评估的高认知需求、高和中等情绪需求、工作影响力低、管理层认可低、中等角色清晰度和高角色冲突预测了 LTSA 和/或残疾养老金。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验