• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在螳螂虾(Stomatopoda)的仪式化战斗中进行相互评估。

Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda).

机构信息

Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jan 31;285(1871). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2542.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2017.2542
PMID:29343603
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5805947/
Abstract

Safe and effective conflict resolution is critical for survival and reproduction. Theoretical models describe how animals resolve conflict by assessing their own and/or their opponent's ability (resource holding potential, RHP), yet experimental tests of these models are often inconclusive. Recent reviews have suggested this uncertainty could be alleviated by using multiple approaches to test assessment models. The mantis shrimp presents visual displays and ritualistically exchanges high-force strikes during territorial contests. We tested how contest dynamics were explained by any of three assessment models-pure self-assessment, cumulative assessment and mutual assessment-using correlations and a novel, network analysis-based sequential behavioural analysis. We staged dyadic contests over burrow access between competitors matched either randomly or based on body size. In both randomly and size-matched contests, the best metric of RHP was body mass. Burrow residency interacted with mass to predict outcome. Correlations between contest costs and RHP rejected pure self-assessment, but could not fully differentiate between cumulative and mutual assessment. The sequential behavioural analysis ruled out cumulative assessment and supported mutual assessment. Our results demonstrate how multiple analyses provide strong inference to tests of assessment models and illuminate how individual behaviours constitute an assessment strategy.

摘要

安全有效的冲突解决对于生存和繁殖至关重要。理论模型描述了动物如何通过评估自身和/或对手的能力(资源持有潜力,RHP)来解决冲突,但这些模型的实验测试往往没有定论。最近的评论表明,通过使用多种方法来测试评估模型,可以减轻这种不确定性。螳螂虾在领地竞争中会展示视觉展示,并仪式性地交换高力量的打击。我们使用相关性和一种新颖的基于网络分析的顺序行为分析,测试了三种评估模型(纯粹的自我评估、累积评估和相互评估)中的任何一种如何解释竞争动态-纯粹的自我评估、累积评估和相互评估。我们在竞争对手之间进行了双体竞争,以争夺进入洞穴的机会,竞争是随机进行的,或者是基于体型进行匹配的。在随机和体型匹配的比赛中,衡量 RHP 的最佳指标是体重。洞穴居住与体重相互作用,预测结果。比赛成本与 RHP 之间的相关性排除了纯粹的自我评估,但不能完全区分累积评估和相互评估。顺序行为分析排除了累积评估并支持相互评估。我们的结果表明,多种分析为评估模型的测试提供了强有力的推断,并阐明了个体行为如何构成评估策略。

相似文献

1
Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda).在螳螂虾(Stomatopoda)的仪式化战斗中进行相互评估。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jan 31;285(1871). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2542.
2
Contests with deadly weapons: telson sparring in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda).使用致命武器的较量:螳螂虾(口足目)的尾节搏斗
Biol Lett. 2015 Sep;11(9):20150558. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0558.
3
Context-dependent scaling of kinematics and energetics during contests and feeding in mantis shrimp.在螳螂虾的争斗和进食过程中,运动学和能量学的上下文相关缩放。
J Exp Biol. 2019 Apr 4;222(Pt 7):jeb198085. doi: 10.1242/jeb.198085.
4
All by myself? Meta-analysis of animal contests shows stronger support for self than for mutual assessment models.独自完成?动物竞赛的荟萃分析更支持自我评估模型而非相互评估模型。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Aug;94(4):1430-1442. doi: 10.1111/brv.12509. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
5
Probing aggressive motivation during territorial contests in a group-living cichlid fish.探究群居丽鱼科鱼类领地争夺期间的攻击动机
Behav Processes. 2013 Jan;92:47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
6
The influence of experience on contest assessment strategies.经验对竞赛评估策略的影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 3;7(1):14492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15144-8.
7
Assessment strategies and fighting patterns in animal contests: a role for serotonin?动物竞争中的评估策略与争斗模式:血清素的作用?
Curr Zool. 2016 Jun;62(3):257-263. doi: 10.1093/cz/zow040. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
8
From Telson to Attack in Mantis Shrimp: Bridging Biomechanics and Behavior in Crustacean Contests.从尾扇到螳螂虾的攻击:甲壳动物争斗中的生物力学与行为的桥梁。
Integr Comp Biol. 2021 Sep 8;61(2):643-654. doi: 10.1093/icb/icab064.
9
The aggressive and territorial behaviour of the mantis shrimp Gonodactylus bredini manning (crustacea: stomatopoda).曼氏刺虾蛄(甲壳纲:口足目)的攻击性行为和领地行为
Behaviour. 1969;33(1):115-36. doi: 10.1163/156853969x00341.
10
Variable assessment of wing colouration in aerial contests of the red-winged damselfly Mnesarete pudica (Zygoptera, Calopterygidae).红翅豆娘Mnesarete pudica(蜻蜓目,色蟌科)空中争斗中翅色的可变评估
Naturwissenschaften. 2015 Apr;102(3-4):13. doi: 10.1007/s00114-015-1261-z. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Familiarity mediated by body size predicts intraspecific aggression in farming damselfishes.由体型介导的熟悉度可预测养殖雀鲷的种内攻击行为。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2025;79(9):89. doi: 10.1007/s00265-025-03636-x. Epub 2025 Aug 30.
2
Neural Repertoire Behind the World's Most Complex Retina: Neuroanatomy of the Stomatopod Lamina.世界上最复杂视网膜背后的神经组构:口足类动物神经层的神经解剖学
J Comp Neurol. 2025 Jun;533(6):e70063. doi: 10.1002/cne.70063.
3
Parrot politics: social decision-making in wild parrots relies on both individual recognition and intrinsic markers.鹦鹉的政治:野生鹦鹉的社会决策既依赖个体识别,也依赖内在标记。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 28;12(5):241542. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241542. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Do lifetime contest costs affect the evolution of assessment strategies? A meta-analysis.终身竞赛成本会影响评估策略的演变吗?一项荟萃分析。
J Anim Ecol. 2025 Jul;94(7):1335-1345. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.70058. Epub 2025 May 26.
5
Social mates dynamically coordinate aggressive behavior to produce strategic territorial defense.社交伙伴会动态协调攻击行为以形成策略性的领地防御。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jan 24;21(1):e1012740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012740. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Behavior and morphology combine to influence energy dissipation in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda).行为和形态共同影响螳螂虾(Stomatopoda)的能量消耗。
J Exp Biol. 2024 Apr 15;227(9). doi: 10.1242/jeb.247063. Epub 2024 May 9.
7
Behavioural Indicators of Pain and Suffering in Arthropods and Might Pain Bite Back?节肢动物疼痛和痛苦的行为指标以及疼痛会反噬吗?
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 12;13(16):2602. doi: 10.3390/ani13162602.
8
Doors to the Homes: Signal Potential of Red Coloration of Claws in Social Hermit Crabs.通往家园之门:群居寄居蟹爪子红色的信号潜力
Integr Org Biol. 2023 May 22;5(1):obad018. doi: 10.1093/iob/obad018. eCollection 2023.
9
Colour vision in stomatopod crustaceans: more questions than answers.十足目甲壳动物的色觉:问题多于答案。
J Exp Biol. 2022 Mar 15;225(6). doi: 10.1242/jeb.243699. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
10
The establishment and maintenance of dominance hierarchies.优势等级制度的建立和维持。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 28;377(1845):20200450. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0450. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The comparative hydrodynamics of rapid rotation by predatory appendages.捕食性附肢快速旋转的比较流体动力学
J Exp Biol. 2016 Nov 1;219(Pt 21):3399-3411. doi: 10.1242/jeb.140590.
2
Contests with deadly weapons: telson sparring in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda).使用致命武器的较量:螳螂虾(口足目)的尾节搏斗
Biol Lett. 2015 Sep;11(9):20150558. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0558.
3
Variation between self- and mutual assessment in animal contests.动物竞争中自我评估与相互评估之间的差异。
Am Nat. 2014 Feb;183(2):199-213. doi: 10.1086/674443. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
4
Ritualized fighting and biological armor: the impact mechanics of the mantis shrimp's telson.仪式化战斗和生物装甲:螳螂虾尾扇的冲击力学。
J Exp Biol. 2010 Oct 15;213(Pt 20):3496-504. doi: 10.1242/jeb.047233.
5
Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders.雄性跳蛛激烈争斗期间的评估。
Anim Behav. 2008 Sep;76(3):901-910. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.032.
6
Stepwise model fitting and statistical inference: turning noise into signal pollution.逐步模型拟合与统计推断:将噪声转化为信号污染。
Am Nat. 2009 Jan;173(1):119-23. doi: 10.1086/593303.
7
Intraspecific deception by bluffing: a defense strategy of newly molted stomatopods (arthropoda: crustacea).同种欺骗:新蜕皮的十足目(节肢动物:甲壳纲)的防御策略。
Science. 1983 Aug 5;221(4610):558-60. doi: 10.1126/science.221.4610.558.
8
From hawks and doves to self-consistent games of territorial behavior.从鹰派和鸽派到具有自我一致性的领土行为博弈。
Am Nat. 2006 Jun;167(6):901-12. doi: 10.1086/504604. Epub 2006 May 10.
9
Extreme impact and cavitation forces of a biological hammer: strike forces of the peacock mantis shrimp Odontodactylus scyllarus.生物锤的极端冲击力与空化力:雀尾螳螂虾齿指虾蛄的打击力
J Exp Biol. 2005 Oct;208(Pt 19):3655-64. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01831.
10
Fighting fruit flies: a model system for the study of aggression.对抗果蝇:一种用于研究攻击行为的模型系统。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 16;99(8):5664-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082102599.