Suppr超能文献

用于治疗髁突下骨折的四种固定技术的阻力。

Resistance of four fixation techniques used to treat subcondylar fractures.

作者信息

Cavalieri-Pereira Lucas, Spagnol Guilherme, Sverzut Cássio Edvard, de Moraes Márcio, Trivellato Alexandre Elias

机构信息

Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café, s/n-Campus USP, 14090-904, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Mar;22(1):91-96. doi: 10.1007/s10006-018-0675-0. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the resistance of four fixation techniques used to treat subcondylar fractures. The following techniques were evaluated: fixation with one 4-hole single straight plate; fixation with one 2-mm 4-hole system plate and one 1.5-mm 3-hole system plate; fixation with two 2-mm plates with a 3-hole anterior plate; and fixation with two 2-mm plates with four holes each.

STUDY DESIGN

Each fixation technique was subjected to a resistance test. The load values were measured when displacement of 1, 2, and 5 mm was reached. Load values were compared for statistically significant differences using analysis of variance (ANOVA; p < 0.5) and Tukey's test.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were observed, when the load was applied to the first molar on the side of the fracture. The group treated with a 4-hole, 2-mm, one plate system showed resistance to lower load values than the groups treated with two plates in any combination.

CONCLUSIONS

When the fracture was fixed using two plates, regardless of the kind of plates used, no statistically significant difference between the groups was observed. However, two plate systems showed better resistance than one plate systems.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估用于治疗髁突下骨折的四种固定技术的抗阻力情况。评估了以下技术:使用一块4孔单直板进行固定;使用一块2毫米4孔系统板和一块1.5毫米3孔系统板进行固定;使用两块2毫米板和一块3孔前板进行固定;以及使用两块各有4孔的2毫米板进行固定。

研究设计

对每种固定技术进行抗阻力测试。当位移达到1、2和5毫米时测量载荷值。使用方差分析(ANOVA;p < 0.5)和Tukey检验比较载荷值以确定统计学上的显著差异。

结果

当在骨折侧的第一磨牙上施加载荷时,观察到统计学上的显著差异。与使用两块板的任何组合治疗的组相比,使用一块4孔、2毫米单板系统治疗的组对较低载荷值的抵抗力较弱。

结论

当使用两块板固定骨折时,无论使用何种类型的板,各组之间均未观察到统计学上的显著差异。然而,两块板系统比一块板系统表现出更好的抗阻力能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验