Emily D'Agostino is with the Health and Fitness Division, Miami-Dade Department of Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces, Miami, FL.
Am J Public Health. 2018 Mar;108(3):324-328. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304216. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
Epidemiology instruction has expanded at the undergraduate level in part because it increases student critical thinking and scientific literacy, promotes students' perception of public health as both practical and relevant, and empowers students as independent, lifelong learners. Why then are more high schools not adopting epidemiology as a course requirement for students? Although prior iterations of high school epidemiology courses are noteworthy for incorporating active and participatory learning, embedding them into existing and continually shifting curricula is challenging and time-consuming, especially for teachers not trained in the field. It also may be argued that currently available epidemiology teaching resources emphasize content rather than thinking skills and therefore do not optimally promote students' personal engagement with, and in-depth understanding of, the mission and goals of public health. I propose a new framework for high school epidemiology that draws from progressive education ideology, including three critical elements: empowerment, authenticity, and transfer. I provide multiple examples to show how this framework has been used across a wide array of settings to hone epidemiology thinking skills in high school students.
流行病学教学在本科阶段得到了扩展,部分原因是它提高了学生的批判性思维和科学素养,使学生认识到公共卫生既实用又相关,并使学生成为独立的终身学习者。那么,为什么更多的高中不将流行病学作为学生的课程要求呢?尽管之前的高中流行病学课程迭代在采用主动和参与式学习方面值得注意,但将其嵌入现有的不断变化的课程中具有挑战性且耗时,尤其是对于没有接受过该领域培训的教师而言。也有人认为,目前可用的流行病学教学资源强调内容而不是思维技能,因此不能最佳地促进学生个人参与和深入理解公共卫生的使命和目标。我提出了一个新的高中流行病学框架,该框架借鉴了进步教育思想,包括三个关键要素:赋权、真实性和迁移。我提供了多个示例,展示了如何在广泛的环境中使用该框架来培养高中生的流行病学思维技能。