Pierconti Francesco, Rossi Esther D, Martini Maurizio, Sacco Emilio, Bassi Pier F, Larocca Luigi M
Division of Anatomic Pathology and Histology.
Division of Urology, Foundation of University Hospital "Agostino Gemelli" School of Medicine, Rome Italy.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2019 Apr;27(4):306-310. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000599.
The occurrence of inked margins with crush artifact derived from the electrocauterization in radical prostatectomy and/or the presence of crushed areas with distorted glands in prostatic samples after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) can induce a significant interobserver variability during histopathologic evaluation of specimens. The specific immunostaining for basal cell markers 34BetaE12 and p63 and for alfa-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) in neoplastic cells is commonly used as an ancillary tool to establish benign and malignant glands. In this study we carried out the immunohistochemical reactions for p63, 34BetaE12, and AMACR on 3 different and successive paraffin sections to discriminate malignant and benign prostatic glands, distorted and crushed by the thermal artifacts in 60 radical prostatectomies and 50 TURP samples. All prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma showed the loss of basal cell markers and expression of AMACR, whereas p63 failed to stain the basal cell layer in benign crushed prostatic glands. The same cauterized glands were steadily positive for 34BetaE12. The high percentage of p63 false negative cases in benign distorted and crushed glands could be explained by the thermal artifacts which might cause lack of p63 antigenicity. In contrast, the antigenicity of 34BetaE12 and AMACR seem not to be affected by cautery artifacts. Thus, in cauterized suspicious prostatic glands an immunohistochemistry panel including, p63, 34BetaE12, and AMACR or only 34BetaE12 is recommended. In addition, after the first evaluation with only p63, we suggest that a separate and confirmatory staining for 34BetaE12 is strongly recommended.
在根治性前列腺切除术中,电灼导致的有挤压伪像的着墨边缘出现,和/或经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)后前列腺样本中出现腺体扭曲的挤压区域,可能会在标本的组织病理学评估过程中引起显著的观察者间差异。肿瘤细胞中基底细胞标志物34BetaE12和p63以及α-甲基酰基辅酶A消旋酶(AMACR)的特异性免疫染色通常用作辅助工具来鉴别良性和恶性腺体。在本研究中,我们对60例根治性前列腺切除术和50例TURP样本中因热伪像而扭曲和挤压的3种不同且连续的石蜡切片进行了p63、34BetaE12和AMACR的免疫组化反应,以区分恶性和良性前列腺腺体。所有前列腺腺泡腺癌均显示基底细胞标志物缺失和AMACR表达,而p63未能对良性挤压的前列腺腺体的基底细胞层进行染色。相同的电灼腺体对34BetaE12持续呈阳性。良性扭曲和挤压腺体中p63假阴性病例的高比例可能由热伪像导致,热伪像可能会导致p63抗原性缺失。相比之下,34BetaE12和AMACR的抗原性似乎不受电灼伪像的影响。因此,对于电灼的可疑前列腺腺体,建议使用包括p63、34BetaE12和AMACR或仅34BetaE12的免疫组化检测组合。此外,在仅用p63进行首次评估后,我们强烈建议对34BetaE12进行单独的确认性染色。