Department of Pharmacology (X.F., Y.D., E.J.H.), Department of Neurology (H.A.J., E.J.H.), and Department of Human Genetics (H.A.J.), School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Department of Pharmacology (X.F., Y.D., E.J.H.), Department of Neurology (H.A.J., E.J.H.), and Department of Human Genetics (H.A.J.), School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2018 Apr;365(1):20-26. doi: 10.1124/jpet.117.246348. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
Although dystonia is often associated with abnormal dopamine neurotransmission, dopaminergic drugs are not currently used to treat dystonia because there is a general view that dopaminergic drugs are ineffective. However, there is little conclusive evidence to support or refute this assumption. Therefore, to assess the therapeutic potential of these compounds, we analyzed results from multiple trials of dopamine receptor agonists in patients with idiopathic dystonias and also tested the efficacy of dopamine receptor agonists in a mouse model of generalized dystonia. Our results suggest that dopamine receptor agonists were effective in some, but not all, patients tested. Further, the mixed D1/D2 dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine was apparently more effective than subtype selective D2 dopamine receptor agonists. However, rigorously controlled trials are still needed. In a mouse model of dystonia, a selective D1 dopamine receptor agonist was not effective while a selective D2 dopamine receptor had modest efficacy. However, when combined, these receptor-selective agonists acted synergistically to ameliorate the dystonia. Coactivation of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors using apomorphine or by increasing extracellular concentrations of dopamine was also effective. Thus, results from both clinical trials and tests in mice suggest that coactivation of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors may be an effective therapeutic strategy in some patients. These results support a reconsideration of dopamine receptors as targets for the treatment of dystonia, particularly because recent genetic and diagnostic advances may facilitate the identification of the subtypes of dystonia patients who respond and those who do not.
虽然肌张力障碍通常与异常多巴胺神经传递有关,但多巴胺能药物目前并未用于治疗肌张力障碍,因为普遍认为多巴胺能药物无效。然而,几乎没有确凿的证据支持或反驳这一假设。因此,为了评估这些化合物的治疗潜力,我们分析了多种多巴胺受体激动剂在特发性肌张力障碍患者中的临床试验结果,还在一种广泛性肌张力障碍的小鼠模型中测试了多巴胺受体激动剂的疗效。我们的结果表明,多巴胺受体激动剂在一些但不是所有接受测试的患者中有效。此外,混合 D1/D2 多巴胺受体激动剂阿扑吗啡显然比亚型选择性 D2 多巴胺受体激动剂更有效。然而,仍需要进行严格控制的试验。在一种肌张力障碍的小鼠模型中,一种选择性 D1 多巴胺受体激动剂无效,而一种选择性 D2 多巴胺受体激动剂则有一定疗效。然而,当这些受体选择性激动剂联合使用时,它们协同作用以改善肌张力障碍。使用阿扑吗啡或增加多巴胺的细胞外浓度来共同激活 D1 和 D2 多巴胺受体也是有效的。因此,临床试验和小鼠试验的结果均表明,共同激活 D1 和 D2 多巴胺受体可能是一些患者的有效治疗策略。这些结果支持重新考虑多巴胺受体作为治疗肌张力障碍的靶点,特别是因为最近的遗传和诊断进展可能有助于确定对治疗有反应和无反应的肌张力障碍患者的亚型。