Maselko Joanna, Bates Lisa, Bhalotra Sonia, Gallis John A, O'Donnell Karen, Sikander Siham, Turner Elizabeth L
Dept. of Epidemiology, 2105e McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Campus Box 7435, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA.
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Oct 31;4:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.10.004. eCollection 2018 Apr.
There is growing interest in the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES), poverty, and mental health in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). However, it is not clear whether a gradient approach focused on a wider SES distribution or a binary poverty approach is more salient for mental health in LMIC. Yet this distinction has implications for interventions aimed at improving population health. We contribute to the literature by examining how multiple indicators of socioeconomic status, including gradient SES and binary poverty indicators, contribute to prenatal depression symptoms in a LMIC context. Prenatal depression is an important public health concern with negative sequela for the mother and her children. We use data on assets, education, food insecurity, debt, and depression symptoms from a sample of 1154 pregnant women residing in rural Pakistan. Women who screened positive for depression participated in a cluster randomized controlled trial of a perinatal depression intervention; all women were interviewed October 2015-February 2016, prior to the start of the intervention. Cluster-specific sampling weights were used to approximate a random sample of pregnant women in the area. Findings indicate that fewer assets, experiencing food insecurity, and having household debt are independently associated with worse depression symptoms. The association with assets is linear with no evidence of a threshold effect, supporting the idea of a gradient in the association between levels of SES and depression symptoms. A gradient was also initially observed with woman's educational attainment, but this association was attenuated once other SES variables were included in the model. Together, the asset, food insecurity, and debt indicators explain 14% of the variance in depression symptoms, more than has been reported in high income country studies. These findings support the use of multiple SES indicators to better elucidate the complex relationship between socioeconomic status and mental health in LMIC.
在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC),社会经济地位(SES)、贫困与心理健康之间的关系越来越受到关注。然而,尚不清楚关注更广泛社会经济地位分布的梯度方法或二元贫困方法对低收入和中等收入国家的心理健康是否更显著。然而,这种区别对旨在改善人群健康的干预措施具有影响。我们通过研究社会经济地位的多个指标,包括梯度社会经济地位和二元贫困指标,如何在低收入和中等收入国家背景下对产前抑郁症状产生影响,为该文献做出了贡献。产前抑郁是一个重要的公共卫生问题,对母亲及其子女有负面后果。我们使用了来自居住在巴基斯坦农村的1154名孕妇样本的资产、教育、粮食不安全、债务和抑郁症状数据。抑郁筛查呈阳性的妇女参加了围产期抑郁干预的整群随机对照试验;所有妇女在2015年10月至2016年2月干预开始前接受了访谈。使用特定整群的抽样权重来近似该地区孕妇的随机样本。研究结果表明,资产较少、经历粮食不安全和有家庭债务与更严重的抑郁症状独立相关。与资产的关联是线性的,没有阈值效应的证据,支持了社会经济地位水平与抑郁症状之间存在梯度关联的观点。最初在女性教育程度方面也观察到了梯度,但一旦模型中纳入其他社会经济变量,这种关联就减弱了。资产、粮食不安全和债务指标共同解释了抑郁症状方差的14%,比高收入国家研究报告的更多。这些发现支持使用多个社会经济指标来更好地阐明低收入和中等收入国家社会经济地位与心理健康之间的复杂关系。