Collins Amanda, Maselko Joanna, Hagaman Ashley, Bates Lisa, Haight Sarah C, Kachoria Aparna G, Gupta Sugandh, Bhalotra Sonia, Sikander Siham, Bibi Amina
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Rural Health Research and Policy Analysis Center, 725 M.L.K. Jr Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, 123 West Franklin St., Suite 210, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.
Disabil Health J. 2025 Jan;18(1):101673. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101673. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
People with disabilities are more likely to experience intimate partner violence (IPV) than those without. Most research examining the relationship between disability and IPV, however, is cross-sectional and approaches disability as a binary variable. This relationship is also important to consider in a South Asian context, where it may be affected by cultural norms surrounding IPV, and resources for people with disabilities.
To estimate the degree to which disability severity increases the risk of subsequent IPV among a cohort of mothers living in rural Pakistan.
Mothers from the Bachpan study (N = 869) with data for at least two consecutive waves between 1-, 2-, 3-, and 6-years postpartum were included in this study. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate the relationship between disability level in the preceding wave and psychological, physical, and sexual IPV in the following wave.
For psychological IPV, the risk ratio (RR) for medium severity was 1.27 (95 % CI: 1.10, 1.46) and the RR for high severity was 1.23 (95 % CI: 1.02, 1.48), relative to low severity. Physical IPV had a medium severity RR of 1.44 (95 % CI: 1.00, 2.06) and high severity RR of 1.60 (95 % CI: 1.02, 2.53). For sexual IPV, the medium severity RR was 1.35 (95 % CI: 1.05, 1.75) and the high severity RR was 1.53 (95 % CI: 1.11, 2.10).
This study supports that, in a low-income, rural South Asian context, mothers with disabilities are particularly susceptible to future psychological, physical, and sexual IPV.
残疾人比非残疾人更易遭受亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)。然而,大多数研究残疾与IPV之间关系的研究都是横断面研究,并且将残疾视为二元变量。在南亚背景下,考虑这种关系也很重要,因为它可能会受到围绕IPV的文化规范以及残疾人资源的影响。
估计在巴基斯坦农村生活的一组母亲中,残疾严重程度增加后续IPV风险的程度。
本研究纳入了来自巴赫潘研究(N = 869)的母亲,她们在产后1年、2年、3年和6年期间至少有连续两波的数据。采用修正泊松回归模型来估计前一波的残疾水平与下一波的心理、身体和性IPV之间的关系。
对于心理IPV,中度严重程度的风险比(RR)为1.27(95%置信区间:1.10,1.46),高度严重程度的RR为1.23(95%置信区间:1.02,1.48),相对于低度严重程度。身体IPV的中度严重程度RR为1.44(95%置信区间:1.00,2.06),高度严重程度RR为1.60(95%置信区间:1.02,2.53)。对于性IPV,中度严重程度RR为1.35(95%置信区间:1.05,1.75),高度严重程度RR为1.53(95%置信区间:1.11,2.10)。
本研究支持,在低收入的南亚农村背景下,残疾母亲特别容易遭受未来的心理、身体和性IPV。