• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进采用基于计算机的评估的关键点。

Key Points to Facilitate the Adoption of Computer-Based Assessments.

作者信息

Burr S A, Chatterjee A, Gibson S, Coombes L, Wilkinson S

机构信息

Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research and Assessment (CAMERA), Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK.

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.

出版信息

J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016 Jun 15;3. doi: 10.4137/JMECD.S20379. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.4137/JMECD.S20379
PMID:29349322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5736289/
Abstract

There are strong pedagogical arguments in favor of adopting computer-based assessment. The risks of technical failure can be managed and are offset by improvements in cost-effectiveness and quality assurance capability. Academic, administrative, and technical leads at an appropriately senior level within an institution need to be identified, so that they can act as effective advocates. All stakeholder groups need to be represented in undertaking a detailed appraisal of requirements and shortlisting software based on core functionality, summative assessment life cycle needs, external compatibility, security, and usability. Any software that is a candidate for adoption should be trialed under simulated summative conditions, with all stakeholders having a voice in agreeing the optimum solution. Transfer to a new system should be carefully planned and communicated, with a programme of training established to maximize the success of adoption.

摘要

有充分的教学理由支持采用基于计算机的评估。技术故障风险是可以管控的,并且成本效益和质量保证能力的提升抵消了这些风险。需要在机构内确定适当高级别的学术、行政和技术负责人,以便他们能成为有效的倡导者。在根据核心功能、总结性评估生命周期需求、外部兼容性、安全性和可用性对需求进行详细评估并筛选软件时,所有利益相关者群体都应参与其中。任何有望被采用的软件都应在模拟总结性条件下进行试用,所有利益相关者都能参与商定最佳解决方案。向新系统的转换应精心规划并进行沟通,同时要制定培训计划以最大程度地提高采用成功率。

相似文献

1
Key Points to Facilitate the Adoption of Computer-Based Assessments.促进采用基于计算机的评估的关键点。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016 Jun 15;3. doi: 10.4137/JMECD.S20379. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.
2
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
If at first you don't succeed … adoption of iPad marking for high-stakes assessments.如果一开始你没有成功……采用iPad标记进行高风险评估。
Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Oct;6(5):356-361. doi: 10.1007/s40037-017-0372-y.
5
Informing a decision framework for when NICE should recommend the use of health technologies only in the context of an appropriately designed programme of evidence development.为 NICE 何时应仅在适当设计的证据开发计划背景下推荐使用卫生技术制定决策框架提供信息。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(46):1-323. doi: 10.3310/hta16460.
6
Investigating the Challenges and Opportunities in Home Care to Facilitate Effective Information Technology Adoption.探讨家庭护理中促进有效采用信息技术的挑战与机遇。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jan;17(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
7
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Sustainable Adoption of Digital Health Innovations: Perspectives From a Stakeholder Workshop.数字健康创新的可持续采用:利益相关者研讨会的观点
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 25;21(3):e11922. doi: 10.2196/11922.
10
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Computerized testing in reading comprehension skill: investigating score interchangeability, item review, age and gender stereotypes, ICT literacy and computer attitudes.阅读理解技能的计算机化测试:探究分数互换性、题目审查、年龄和性别刻板印象、信息通信技术素养及计算机态度。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(2):1771-1810. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10584-2. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost analyses approaches in medical education: there are no simple solutions.医学教育中的成本分析方法:没有简单的解决方案。
Med Educ. 2013 Oct;47(10):962-8. doi: 10.1111/medu.12214.
2
Delivery and use of individualised feedback in large class medical teaching.在大班医学教学中提供和使用个性化反馈。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 May 3;13:63. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-63.
3
Are MOOCs the future of medical education?大规模开放在线课程(MOOCs)是医学教育的未来吗?
BMJ. 2013 Apr 26;346:f2666. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2666.
4
Technology-enabled assessment of health professions education: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference.技术支持的健康职业教育评估:来自渥太华 2010 会议的共识声明和建议。
Med Teach. 2011;33(5):364-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565832.
5
Differences in motives between Millennial and Generation X medical students.千禧一代和 X 世代医学生动机的差异。
Med Educ. 2010 Jun;44(6):570-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03633.x.
6
Beyond assessment: feedback for individuals and institutions based on the progress test.超越评估:基于进展测试的个体和机构反馈。
Med Teach. 2010;32(6):486-90. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.485652.
7
Online eAssessment: AMEE guide no. 39.在线电子评估:AMEE 指南第 39 号。
Med Teach. 2009 Mar;31(3):192-206. doi: 10.1080/01421590902792406.
8
Assessment of learning with multiple-choice questions.多选题评估学习。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2005 Jul;5(4):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2004.12.005.
9
Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment.评估计算机自适应测试在医学课程评估中的实用性。
Acad Med. 1999 Oct;74(10):1125-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199910000-00016.