• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塞莱提亚:恩格列净与西他列汀治疗希腊2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析。

CELESTIA: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Greece.

作者信息

Ghetti Gianni, Pradelli Lorenzo, Papageorgiou Giannis, Karpouzos George, Arikan Yelda

机构信息

AdRes Health Economics and Outcome Research, Turin, Italy.

Boehringer Ingelheim Hellas, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Feb 17;15:97-109. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S400522. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S400522
PMID:36825076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942503/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Globally, the prevalence of diabetes is on the rise, with the number of affected individuals predicted to cross 700 million by 2045. In Greece, in 2015, almost 700,000 people received prescribed medication for type 2 diabetes. The CELESTIA study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin compared to branded sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes patients both with and without established cardiovascular disease in Greece from a third payer perspective.

METHODS

The IQVIA Core Diabetes Model was used and analyses were conducted from the Greek healthcare payer perspective. Patients received either empagliflozin or sitagliptin until HbA1c threshold of 8.5% (69 mmol/mol) was exceeded. Subsequently, patients were assumed to intensify to insulin therapy. Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects were derived from clinical trial data. Literature data were used for input (utilities, treatment costs and costs of diabetes-related complications costs). A lifetime time horizon (50 years) was applied, and costs and benefits were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, for empagliflozin, the estimated ICER was of €6,587 and €966 per quality-adjusted life years gained versus sitagliptin, in patients without established cardiovascular disease and in patients with established cardiovascular disease, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the analysis.

CONCLUSION

The analysis demonstrated that for type 2 diabetes patients, empagliflozin is a cost-effective treatment option versus branded sitagliptin in Greece.

摘要

目的

在全球范围内,糖尿病的患病率正在上升,预计到2045年受影响个体的数量将超过7亿。在希腊,2015年有近70万人接受了2型糖尿病的处方药治疗。CELESTIA研究旨在从第三方支付者的角度评估在希腊患有和未患有已确诊心血管疾病的2型糖尿病患者中,恩格列净与品牌西他列汀相比的成本效益。

方法

使用IQVIA核心糖尿病模型,并从希腊医疗保健支付者的角度进行分析。患者接受恩格列净或西他列汀治疗,直到糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)阈值超过8.5%(69 mmol/mol)。随后,假设患者强化胰岛素治疗。基线队列特征和治疗效果来自临床试验数据。文献数据用于输入(效用、治疗成本和糖尿病相关并发症成本)。采用50年的终生时间范围,成本和效益按每年3.5%的贴现率进行贴现。

结果

在终生时间范围内,对于恩格列净,在未患有已确诊心血管疾病的患者和患有已确诊心血管疾病的患者中,与西他列汀相比,每获得一个质量调整生命年的估计增量成本效果比分别为6587欧元和966欧元。概率敏感性分析证实了该分析的稳健性。

结论

分析表明,对于2型糖尿病患者,在希腊,与品牌西他列汀相比,恩格列净是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a29f/9942503/82b1aafd81bd/CEOR-15-97-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a29f/9942503/82b1aafd81bd/CEOR-15-97-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a29f/9942503/82b1aafd81bd/CEOR-15-97-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
CELESTIA: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Greece.塞莱提亚:恩格列净与西他列汀治疗希腊2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Feb 17;15:97-109. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S400522. eCollection 2023.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin in Comparison to Sitagliptin and Saxagliptin Based on Cardiovascular Outcome Trials in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Established Cardiovascular Disease.基于2型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者的心血管结局试验,恩格列净与西格列汀和沙格列汀的成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Dec;10(6):2153-2167. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00701-3. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
3
Oral Semaglutide Versus Empagliflozin, Sitagliptin and Liraglutide in the UK: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Based on the PIONEER Clinical Trial Programme.在英国,口服司美格鲁肽与恩格列净、西他列汀和利拉鲁肽的比较:基于先锋临床试验项目的长期成本效益分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jan;11(1):259-277. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00736-6. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
4
The Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Semaglutide in Spain: A Long-Term Health Economic Analysis Based on the PIONEER Clinical Trials.口服司美格鲁肽在西班牙的成本效益:基于 PIONEER 临床试验的长期健康经济分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jul;39(7):3180-3198. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02156-8. Epub 2022 May 12.
5
Long-Term Cost Effectiveness of Oral Semaglutide Versus Empagliflozin and Sitagliptin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the Swedish Setting.在瑞典背景下,口服司美格鲁肽与恩格列净和西他列汀治疗2型糖尿病的长期成本效益
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 May;6(3):343-354. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00317-z. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Greece.依帕列净治疗伴心血管风险升高的希腊 2 型糖尿病患者的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2018 May;38(5):417-426. doi: 10.1007/s40261-018-0620-x.
7
Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease in China.恩格列净在中国2型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者中的成本效益分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Aug 4;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00299-z.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin versus sitagliptin as second-line therapy for treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes in the United States.恩格列净与西他列汀作为美国 2 型糖尿病二线治疗药物的成本效果分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Mar;23(3):791-799. doi: 10.1111/dom.14268. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Empagliflozin Compared with Dapagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Established Cardiovascular Disease in Greece.恩格列净与达格列净治疗希腊 2 型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Apr;41(4):371-380. doi: 10.1007/s40261-021-01013-w. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
10
The Cost-Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Semaglutide Versus Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled on Metformin Alone in Denmark.在丹麦,皮下注射司美格鲁肽与恩格列净治疗单用二甲双胍血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病的成本效益比较
Diabetes Ther. 2022 Mar;13(3):489-503. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01221-3. Epub 2022 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin in routine care patients: Results from the EMPagliflozin compaRative effectIveness and SafEty (EMPRISE) study.恩格列净在常规护理患者中的疗效和安全性:来自 EMPagliflozin 比较疗效和安全性(EMPRISE)研究的结果。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Mar;24(3):442-454. doi: 10.1111/dom.14593. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
2
Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease in China.恩格列净在中国2型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者中的成本效益分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Aug 4;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00299-z.
3
The long-term cost-effectiveness of oral semaglutide in the Netherlands based on the PIONEER 2, 3 and 4 randomized controlled trials.
基于 PIONEER 2、3 和 4 项随机对照试验的荷兰口服司美格鲁肽的长期成本效益。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 May;175:108759. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108759. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin versus sitagliptin as second-line therapy for treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes in the United States.恩格列净与西他列汀作为美国 2 型糖尿病二线治疗药物的成本效果分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Mar;23(3):791-799. doi: 10.1111/dom.14268. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
5
Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin compared with liraglutide based on cardiovascular outcome trials in Type II diabetes.恩格列净与利拉鲁肽比较的成本效益:基于 2 型糖尿病心血管结局试验。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Aug;9(11):781-794. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0071. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
6
Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes - Global Burden of Disease and Forecasted Trends.2 型糖尿病的流行病学——全球疾病负担和预测趋势。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020 Mar;10(1):107-111. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.191028.001.
7
2019 Update to: Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2019 年更新版:《2018 年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)与欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)关于 2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理的共识报告》。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):487-493. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0066. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
Oral Semaglutide Versus Empagliflozin, Sitagliptin and Liraglutide in the UK: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Based on the PIONEER Clinical Trial Programme.在英国,口服司美格鲁肽与恩格列净、西他列汀和利拉鲁肽的比较:基于先锋临床试验项目的长期成本效益分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jan;11(1):259-277. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00736-6. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
9
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin in Comparison to Sitagliptin and Saxagliptin Based on Cardiovascular Outcome Trials in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Established Cardiovascular Disease.基于2型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者的心血管结局试验,恩格列净与西格列汀和沙格列汀的成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Dec;10(6):2153-2167. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00701-3. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
10
Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9 edition.2019 年全球及各区域糖尿病患病率估算值及 2030 年和 2045 年预测值:国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图集(第 9 版)的结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. Epub 2019 Sep 10.