• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助冠状动脉搭桥手术:18年单中心经验

Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery: an 18-year single-centre experience.

作者信息

Giambruno Vincenzo, Chu Michael W, Fox Stephanie, Swinamer Stuart A, Rayman Reiza, Markova Zarina, Barnfield Rebecca, Cooper Mitchell, Boyd Douglas W, Menkis Alan, Kiaii Bob

机构信息

Division of cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2018 Jun;14(3):e1891. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1891. Epub 2018 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.1891
PMID:29349908
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive robot-assisted direct coronary artery bypass (RADCAB) has emerged as a feasible minimally invasive surgical technique for revascularization that might offer several potential advantages over conventional approaches. We present our 18-year experience in RADCAB.

METHODS

Between February 1998 and February 2016, 605 patients underwent RADCAB. Patients underwent post-procedural selective graft patency assessment using cardiac catheterization.

RESULTS

The mortality rate was 0.3%. The rate of conversion to sternotomy for any cause was reduced from 16.0% of the first 200 cases to 6.9% of the last 405 patients. The patency rate of the LITA-to-LAD anastomosis was 97.4%. Surgical re-exploration for bleeding occurred in 1.8% of patients, and the transfusion rate was 9.2%. Average ICU stay was 1.2 ± 1.4 days, and average hospital stay was 4.8 ± 2.9 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting is safe, feasible and it seems to represent an effective alternative to traditional coronary artery bypass grafting in selected patients.

摘要

背景

微创机器人辅助直接冠状动脉旁路移植术(RADCAB)已成为一种可行的微创血管重建手术技术,与传统方法相比可能具有若干潜在优势。我们介绍我们18年来开展RADCAB的经验。

方法

1998年2月至2016年2月期间,605例患者接受了RADCAB。患者术后采用心导管检查进行选择性移植物通畅性评估。

结果

死亡率为0.3%。因任何原因转为胸骨切开术的比例从前200例中的16.0%降至最后405例患者中的6.9%。左内乳动脉至左前降支吻合口的通畅率为97.4%。1.8%的患者因出血进行了手术再次探查,输血率为9.2%。平均重症监护病房停留时间为1.2±1.4天,平均住院时间为4.8±2.9天。

结论

机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术是安全可行的,对于特定患者似乎是传统冠状动脉旁路移植术的有效替代方法。

相似文献

1
Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery: an 18-year single-centre experience.机器人辅助冠状动脉搭桥手术:18年单中心经验
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Jun;14(3):e1891. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1891. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
2
Outcomes after different non-sternotomy approaches to left single-vessel revascularization: a comparative study with up to 10-year follow-up.不同非胸骨切开术式行左单支血管血运重建后的结果:一项长达10年随访的比较研究
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):e48-55. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu287. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
3
Consequences of Hybrid Procedure Addition to Robotic-Assisted Direct Coronary Artery Bypass.杂交手术附加于机器人辅助直接冠状动脉旁路移植术的后果
Innovations (Phila). 2017 May/Jun;12(3):192-196. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000359.
4
The Comparison between Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass Grafting Surgery and Conventional Bypass Grafting Surgery in Proximal LAD Lesion.微创冠状动脉旁路移植手术与传统旁路移植手术治疗左前降支近端病变的比较
Heart Surg Forum. 2015 Apr 28;18(2):E042-6. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1239.
5
Eleven-year outcomes of U-clips in totally robotic coronary artery bypass grafting versus standard hand-sewn running suture in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术中 U 型夹与标准手工连续缝合在全机器人冠状动脉旁路移植术中的 11 年结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun 28;33(1):27-33. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab053.
6
Reason and Timing for Conversion to Sternotomy in Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Patient Outcomes.机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术中转为胸骨切开术的原因、时机及患者预后
Innovations (Phila). 2018 Nov/Dec;13(6):423-427. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000566.
7
Results of the Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Angiographic Patency Study.微创冠状动脉旁路移植术血管造影通畅性研究结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):203-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
8
Pain and the Quality of Life Following Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery.机器人辅助微创手术后的疼痛与生活质量
Heart Surg Forum. 2016 Aug 19;19(4):E165-8. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1606.
9
Early clinical and angiographic outcomes after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery.机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路手术后的早期临床和血管造影结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
10
Ultrafast Track Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Surgical Revascularization.超快通道机器人辅助微创冠状动脉外科血运重建术
Innovations (Phila). 2017 Sep/Oct;12(5):346-350. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000401.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Robotics in Cardiac Surgery: Innovations, Outcomes, and Future Prospects.机器人技术在心脏外科手术中的作用:创新、成果与未来前景。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 30;16(11):e74884. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74884. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of two decades of reported outcomes for robotic coronary artery bypass grafting.机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术二十年报告结果的系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 31;13(4):311-325. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-rcabg-0191. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
Issues and considerations in perioperative management of robotic coronary bypass grafting.
机器人冠状动脉旁路移植术围手术期管理中的问题与考量
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 31;13(4):326-331. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-rcabg-0203. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
4
Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Surgical Technique.机器人辅助微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术:一种手术技术。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 22;13(8):2435. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082435.
5
Minimally invasive surgical coronary artery bypass in women.女性患者的微创外科冠状动脉搭桥术
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Nov 27;12(6):596-605. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-adw-15. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
6
Recent Advances in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Techniques and Outcomes: A Narrative Review.冠状动脉旁路移植术技术与预后的最新进展:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2023 Sep 18;15(9):e45511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45511. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
A Nationwide Study of Clinical Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Hybrid Revascularization in the Netherlands.荷兰全国范围内机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术和杂交血运重建术后临床结局的研究。
Innovations (Phila). 2023 Jan-Feb;18(1):73-79. doi: 10.1177/15569845231154046. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
8
Robot-assisted vs. conventional MIDCAB: A propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助与传统微创冠状动脉旁路移植术:倾向匹配分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 30;9:943076. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.943076. eCollection 2022.
9
Minimally invasive left internal mammary artery harvesting techniques during the learning curve are safe and achieve similar results as conventional LIMA harvesting techniques.在学习曲线期间,微创左内乳动脉采集技术是安全的,并且可以获得与传统 LIMA 采集技术相似的结果。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 24;17(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01961-0.
10
Early home discharge after robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术后的早期家庭出院。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun 15;35(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac134.