Department of Psychiatry, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital, Chungju, Korea.
Department of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Jan 29;33(5):e37. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e37.
We aimed to verify a Korean version of the Abbreviated University of California, Los Angeles, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index (Abb-UCLA-PTSD RI-Korean version) among Korean adolescents to assess post-traumatic stress in this population.
We recruited 1,254 adolescents who completed the Abb-UCLA-PTSD RI-Korean version scale, the Child Report of Post-Traumatic Symptoms (CROPS), the Lifetime Incidence of Traumatic Events (LITE), and the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Test-retest reliability was computed for a randomly selected 314 participants. Among all the students, 765 were included in the analysis because 143 students were classified in the normative group (LITE 1) and 622 were in the traumatized group (LITE 4).
The internal consistencies of the nine-item and eight-item versions of the Abb-UCLA PTSD RI-Korean version were found to be high (Cronbach's α = 0.843 and 0.842, respectively). The criterion-related validity was based on comparison of the Abb-UCLA PTSD RI total scores between the normative and trauma groups. For the eight-item version, the normative group (4.6 ± 4.6) and the traumatized group (8.8 ± 6.0) demonstrated better criterion-related validity than those in the nine-item version (4.5 ± 4.3 and 8.5 ± 5.0, respectively). The test-retest reliability of the eight-item version was better than the nine-item version (r = 0.85 vs. 0.77). A two-factor model with eight items (two items regarding sleep, and the other six items made up the second factor) showed the best fit.
Our results indicate that the eight-item Abb-UCLA PTSD RI-Korean version is a useful screening tool for post-traumatic stress in Korean adolescents.
本研究旨在验证韩文版简化加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(Abb-UCLA-PTSD RI-Korean version)在韩国青少年中的适用性,以评估该人群的创伤后应激状况。
我们招募了 1254 名青少年,他们完成了 Abb-UCLA-PTSD RI-Korean 版本量表、儿童创伤后症状报告(CROPS)、创伤事件终身发生率(LITE)和儿童抑郁量表(CDI)。我们对随机选择的 314 名参与者进行了重测信度计算。在所有学生中,有 765 名学生被纳入分析,其中 143 名学生被归入正常组(LITE 1),622 名学生被归入创伤组(LITE 4)。
Abb-UCLA PTSD RI-Korean 版本的九项和八项版本的内部一致性都很高(Cronbach's α 分别为 0.843 和 0.842)。效标关联效度基于正常组和创伤组 Abb-UCLA PTSD RI 总分的比较。对于八项版本,正常组(4.6 ± 4.6)和创伤组(8.8 ± 6.0)的效标关联效度优于九项版本(4.5 ± 4.3 和 8.5 ± 5.0)。八项版本的重测信度优于九项版本(r = 0.85 vs. 0.77)。一个包含八项的两因素模型(两项关于睡眠,其余六项组成第二个因素)表现出最佳拟合度。
我们的结果表明,八条目 Abb-UCLA PTSD RI-Korean 版本是一种评估韩国青少年创伤后应激的有用筛查工具。