Carolan Kate, Verran Joanna, Crossley Matthew, Redfern James, Whitton Nicola, Amos Martyn
School of Computing, Mathematics and Digital Technology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
School of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 19;13(1):e0190984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190984. eCollection 2018.
Current immunisation levels in England currently fall slightly below the threshold recommended by the World Health Organization, and the three-year trend for vaccination uptake is downwards. Attitudes towards vaccination can affect future decisions on whether or not to vaccinate, and this can have significant public health implications. Interventions can impact future vaccination decisions, and these interventions can take several forms. Relatively little work has been reported on the use of vaccination interventions in young people, who form the next generation of individuals likely to make vaccination decisions.
We investigated the impact of two different types of educational intervention on attitudes towards vaccination in young people in England. A cohort of young people (n = 63) was recruited via a local school. This group was divided into three sub-groups; one (n = 21) received a presentation-based intervention, one (n = 26) received an interactive simulation-based intervention, and the third (n = 16) received no intervention. Participants supplied information on (1) their attitudes towards vaccination, and (2) their information needs and views on personal choice concerning vaccination, at three time points: immediately before and after the intervention, and after six months.
Neither intervention had a significant effect on participants' attitudes towards vaccination. However, the group receiving the presentation-based intervention saw a sustained uplift in confidence about information needs, which was not observed in the simulation-based intervention group.
Our findings with young people are consistent with previous work on vaccination interventions aimed at adults, which have shown limited effectiveness, and which can actually reduce intention to vaccinate. Our findings on the most effective mode of delivery for the intervention should inform future discussion in the growing "games for health" domain, which proposes the use of interactive digital resources in healthcare education.
目前英格兰的免疫接种水平略低于世界卫生组织建议的阈值,且疫苗接种率的三年趋势呈下降态势。对疫苗接种的态度会影响未来是否接种疫苗的决策,这可能对公共卫生产生重大影响。干预措施会影响未来的疫苗接种决策,且这些干预措施可以有多种形式。关于在年轻人中使用疫苗接种干预措施的报道相对较少,而年轻人是未来可能做出疫苗接种决策的下一代人群。
我们调查了两种不同类型的教育干预措施对英格兰年轻人疫苗接种态度的影响。通过当地一所学校招募了一组年轻人(n = 63)。该组被分为三个亚组;一组(n = 21)接受基于讲座的干预措施,一组(n = 26)接受基于交互式模拟的干预措施,第三组(n = 16)不接受任何干预。参与者在三个时间点提供了以下信息:(1)他们对疫苗接种的态度,以及(2)他们对疫苗接种的信息需求和对个人选择的看法,这三个时间点分别是:干预前、干预后以及六个月后。
两种干预措施对参与者的疫苗接种态度均无显著影响。然而,接受基于讲座的干预措施的小组在信息需求方面的信心持续提升,而基于模拟的干预措施小组则未观察到这一情况。
我们在年轻人中的研究结果与先前针对成年人的疫苗接种干预措施的研究一致,这些研究表明效果有限,实际上还可能降低接种意愿。我们关于干预措施最有效实施方式的研究结果应为日益发展的“健康游戏”领域的未来讨论提供参考,该领域提议在医疗保健教育中使用交互式数字资源。