• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血流导向装置尺寸的计算模拟早期结果:尺寸变化的定量评估和模拟误差评估。

Early Results in Flow Diverter Sizing by Computational Simulation: Quantification of Size Change and Simulation Error Assessment.

机构信息

CHRU Hospitaux de Tours, UMR "Imagerie et Cervau," Inserm U930, Université Francois-Rabelais, Tours, France.

Hospital Clinic Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018 Nov 1;15(5):557-566. doi: 10.1093/ons/opx288.

DOI:10.1093/ons/opx288
PMID:29351652
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sizing of flow diverters (FDs) stent in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms is a challenging task due to the change of stent length after implantation.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the size change and assess the error in length prediction in 82 simulated FD deployments.

METHODS

Eighty-two consecutive patients treated with FDs were retrospectively analyzed. Implanted FD length was measured from angiographic images and compared to the nominal sizes of the implanted device. Length change was obtained by subtracting the nominal length from the real length and dividing by the nominal length. Implanted devices were simulated on 3-dimensional models of each patient. Simulation error was obtained by subtracting real length from simulated length and dividing by the real length of the FD. Subanalysis was done using ANOVA. Statistical significance was set to P < .05, and bootstrap resampling was used.

RESULTS

When assessing the length change of the FD after implantation, changes of 30% in average and up to 80% with reference to the nominal length of the device were observed. The simulation results showed a lower error of 3.52% in average with a maximum of 30%. Paired t-test showed nonsignificant differences between measured and real length (P = .07, with the mean of differences at 0.45 mm, 95% confidence interval [-0.950 0.038]).

CONCLUSION

Nominal length is not an accurate sizing metric when choosing the size of an FD irrespective of the brand and manufacturer. Good estimation of the final length of the stent after deployment as expressed by an error of 3.5% in average.

摘要

背景

由于支架在植入后的长度变化,颅内动脉瘤血流导向装置(FD)支架的尺寸选择是一项具有挑战性的任务。

目的

量化 82 例模拟 FD 展开中的尺寸变化,并评估长度预测中的误差。

方法

回顾性分析 82 例接受 FD 治疗的连续患者。从血管造影图像中测量植入 FD 的长度,并与植入器械的标称尺寸进行比较。长度变化通过从标称长度中减去实际长度,再除以标称长度来获得。对每位患者的 3D 模型进行植入器械模拟。通过从实际长度中减去模拟长度,再除以 FD 的实际长度来获得模拟误差。进行方差分析亚组分析。统计学意义设定为 P<0.05,并使用 bootstrap 重采样。

结果

当评估植入后 FD 的长度变化时,观察到平均变化 30%,最高可达 80%,与器械的标称长度相比。模拟结果显示平均误差较低,为 3.52%,最大为 30%。配对 t 检验显示测量长度与实际长度之间无显著差异(P=0.07,差异均值为 0.45 毫米,95%置信区间[-0.950,0.038])。

结论

无论品牌和制造商如何,标称长度都不是选择 FD 尺寸的准确指标。平均误差为 3.5%,可以很好地估计支架在展开后的最终长度。

相似文献

1
Early Results in Flow Diverter Sizing by Computational Simulation: Quantification of Size Change and Simulation Error Assessment.血流导向装置尺寸的计算模拟早期结果:尺寸变化的定量评估和模拟误差评估。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018 Nov 1;15(5):557-566. doi: 10.1093/ons/opx288.
2
Deployment of flow diverter devices: prediction of foreshortening and validation of the simulation in 18 clinical cases.血流导向装置的部署:18 例临床病例中缩短的预测和模拟验证。
Neuroradiology. 2019 Nov;61(11):1319-1326. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02287-w. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
3
Investigation of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics following flow diverter stent treatment.颅内动脉瘤血流动力学在血流导向支架治疗后的研究。
Med Eng Phys. 2013 May;35(5):608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.07.005. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
4
High-fidelity virtual stenting: modeling of flow diverter deployment for hemodynamic characterization of complex intracranial aneurysms.高保真虚拟支架置入:用于复杂颅内动脉瘤血流动力学特征分析的血流导向装置置入建模
J Neurosurg. 2015 Oct;123(4):832-40. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.JNS14497. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
Evaluation of Two Fast Virtual Stenting Algorithms for Intracranial Aneurysm Flow Diversion.评价两种用于颅内动脉瘤血流导向装置的快速虚拟支架置入算法。
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2020;17(1):58-70. doi: 10.2174/1567202617666200120141608.
6
Comparison of Flow Reduction Efficacy of Nominal and Oversized Flow Diverters Using a Novel Measurement-assisted in Silico Method.使用新型测量辅助的计算方法比较标称和超大口径血流导向装置的血流减少效果。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep;34(3):675-684. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01404-4. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
7
Towards the patient-specific design of flow diverters made from helix-like wires: an optimization study.面向由螺旋状金属丝制成的血流导向装置的个性化设计:一项优化研究。
Biomed Eng Online. 2016 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):159. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0257-z.
8
Evaluating the Effect of the Number of Wire of Flow Diverter Stents on the Nonstagnated Region Formation in an Aneurysm Sac Using Lagrangian Coherent Structure and Hyperbolic Time Analysis.评估使用拉格朗日相干结构和双曲时间分析血流导向支架的丝数对动脉瘤囊中无停滞区形成的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e666-e682. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.116. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
9
Computer modeling of deployment and mechanical expansion of neurovascular flow diverter in patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.计算机模拟神经血管血流导向装置在颅内动脉瘤患者中的部署和机械扩张。
J Biomech. 2012 Aug 31;45(13):2256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
10
Verification of software-based preoperative simulation of flow diverters in clinical cases.基于软件的血流导向装置术前模拟在临床病例中的验证。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Oct;29(5):510-519. doi: 10.1177/15910199221097264. Epub 2022 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Software-based simulation for pipeline vantage flow diverter preprocedural assessment: Method and validation study.基于软件的Pipeline Vantage血流导向装置术前评估模拟:方法与验证研究
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Jul 23:15910199251358590. doi: 10.1177/15910199251358590.
2
Application of virtual deployment and hemodynamic simulation in treatment of a basal arterial dissecting aneurysm using flow diverter: A case report and literature review.虚拟部署和血流动力学模拟在使用血流导向装置治疗基底动脉夹层动脉瘤中的应用:病例报告及文献综述
Heliyon. 2025 Feb 10;11(4):e42545. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42545. eCollection 2025 Feb 28.
3
Computer Aided Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Based on 2D/3D Mapping, Virtual Deployment and Online Distal Marker Detection.
基于二维/三维映射、虚拟部署和在线远端标记检测的计算机辅助颅内动脉瘤治疗
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2024 Dec;15(6):691-703. doi: 10.1007/s13239-024-00745-y. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
4
Comparison of Flow Reduction Efficacy of Nominal and Oversized Flow Diverters Using a Novel Measurement-assisted in Silico Method.使用新型测量辅助的计算方法比较标称和超大口径血流导向装置的血流减少效果。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep;34(3):675-684. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01404-4. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
5
High variability in physician estimations of flow-diverting stent deployment versus PreSize Neurovascular software simulation: a comparison study.医生对血流导向支架置入的估计与 PreSize 神经血管软件模拟之间存在高度变异性:一项比较研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 May 21;16(6):559-566. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020527.
6
Cerebral Aneurysm Occlusion at 12-Month Follow-Up After Flow-Diverter Treatment: Statistical Modeling for V&V With Real-World Data.血流导向装置治疗后12个月随访时的脑动脉瘤闭塞:基于真实世界数据的验证与确认统计建模
Front Med Technol. 2021 Sep 17;3:705003. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.705003. eCollection 2021.
7
Predicting flow diverter sizing using the AneuGuide software: a validation study.使用 AneuGuide 软件预测血流导向装置的大小:一项验证研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Jan;15(1):57-62. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018353. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
8
A Multicenter Pilot Study on the Clinical Utility of Computational Modeling for Flow-Diverter Treatment Planning.计算建模在血流导向装置治疗计划中的临床应用的多中心初步研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Oct;40(10):1759-1765. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6222. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
9
Deployment of flow diverter devices: prediction of foreshortening and validation of the simulation in 18 clinical cases.血流导向装置的部署:18 例临床病例中缩短的预测和模拟验证。
Neuroradiology. 2019 Nov;61(11):1319-1326. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02287-w. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
10
Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device Sizing Based on Conventional 2D Measurements and Virtual Simulation Using the Sim&Size Software: An Agreement Study.基于传统二维测量和 Sim&Size 软件虚拟模拟的 Pipeline 栓塞装置型号选择比较:一项一致性研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):524-530. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5973. Epub 2019 Feb 7.