Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 19;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0472-3.
Video vignettes are used to test the effects of physicians' communication on patient outcomes. Methodological choices in video-vignette development may have far-stretching consequences for participants' engagement with the video, and thus the ecological validity of this design. To supplement the scant evidence in this field, this study tested how variations in video-vignette introduction format and camera focus influence participants' engagement with a video vignette showing a bad news consultation.
Introduction format (A = audiovisual vs. B = written) and camera focus (1 = the physician only, 2 = the physician and the patient at neutral moments alternately, 3 = the physician and the patient at emotional moments alternately) were varied in a randomized 2 × 3 between-subjects design. One hundred eighty-one students were randomly assigned to watch one of the six resulting video-vignette conditions as so-called analogue patients, i.e., they were instructed to imagine themselves being in the video patient's situation. Four dimensions of self-reported engagement were assessed retrospectively. Emotional engagement was additionally measured by recording participants' electrodermal and cardiovascular activity continuously while watching. Analyses of variance were used to test the effects of introduction format, camera focus and their interaction.
The audiovisual introduction induced a stronger blood pressure response during watching the introduction (p = 0.048, [Formula: see text]= 0.05) and the consultation part of the vignette (p = 0.051, [Formula: see text]= 0.05), when compared to the written introduction. With respect to camera focus, results revealed that the variant focusing on the patient at emotional moments evoked a higher level of electrodermal activity (p = 0.003, [Formula: see text]= 0.06), when compared to the other two variants. Furthermore, an interaction effect was shown on self-reported emotional engagement (p = 0.045, [Formula: see text]= 0.04): the physician-only variant resulted in lower emotional engagement if the vignette was preceded by the audiovisual introduction. No effects were shown on the other dimensions of self-reported engagement.
Our findings imply that using an audiovisual introduction combined with alternating camera focus depicting patient's emotions results in the highest levels of emotional engagement in analogue patients. This evidence can inform methodological decisions during the development of video vignettes, and thereby enhance the ecological validity of future video-vignettes studies.
视频小插曲被用于测试医生的沟通方式对患者结局的影响。在视频小插曲的开发中,方法学的选择可能会对参与者对视频的参与度产生深远的影响,从而影响到这种设计的生态有效性。为了补充该领域证据的不足,本研究测试了视频小插曲介绍格式和摄像机焦点的变化如何影响参与者对展示不良预后咨询的视频小插曲的参与度。
采用随机 2×3 被试间设计,在视听(A)与书面(B)介绍格式和摄像机焦点(1=仅医生,2=医生和患者在中立时刻交替出现,3=医生和患者在情绪时刻交替出现)之间进行变化。181 名学生被随机分配观看六种视频小插曲条件之一,作为所谓的模拟患者,即他们被指示想象自己处于视频患者的情境中。采用回顾性评估的方法,对四个维度的自我报告参与度进行了评估。连续记录参与者观看视频时的皮肤电和心血管活动,以评估情绪参与度。采用方差分析检验介绍格式、摄像机焦点及其交互作用的影响。
与书面介绍相比,视听介绍在观看介绍(p=0.048,[Formula: see text]=0.05)和小插曲咨询部分时会引起更强的血压反应(p=0.051,[Formula: see text]=0.05)。关于摄像机焦点,结果显示,与其他两个变体相比,聚焦于情绪时刻患者的变体引起更高水平的皮肤电活动(p=0.003,[Formula: see text]=0.06)。此外,自我报告的情绪参与度也显示出交互作用(p=0.045,[Formula: see text]=0.04):如果小插曲之前是视听介绍,则仅医生的变体会导致较低的情绪参与度。在其他自我报告的参与度维度上没有显示出效果。
我们的研究结果表明,使用视听介绍与交替呈现患者情绪的摄像机焦点相结合,可以使模拟患者产生最高水平的情绪参与度。这些证据可以为视频小插曲开发过程中的方法学决策提供信息,并提高未来视频小插曲研究的生态有效性。