Department of Behavioral Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Centre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(3):651-663. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07044-5. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
Providing diagnostic and treatment information to patients is a core clinical skill, but evidence for the effectiveness of different information-giving strategies is inconsistent. This systematic review aimed to investigate the reported effects of empirically tested communication strategies for providing information on patient-related outcomes: information recall and (health-related) behaviors.
The databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and relevant bibliographies were systematically searched from the inception to April 24, 2020, without restrictions, for articles testing information-giving strategies for physicians (PROSPERO ID: CRD42019115791). Pairs of independent reviewers identified randomized controlled studies with a low risk of selection bias as from the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Main outcomes were grouped into patient information recall and behavioral outcomes (e.g., alcohol consumption, weight loss, participation in screening). Due to high heterogeneity in the data on effects of interventions, these outcomes were descriptively reported, together with studies', interventions', and information-giving strategies' characteristics. PRISMA guidelines were followed.
Seventeen of 9423 articles were included. Eight studies, reporting 10 interventions, assessed patient information recall: mostly conducted in experimental settings and testing a single information-giving strategy. Four of the ten interventions reported significant increase in recall. Nine studies assessed behavioral outcomes, mostly in real-life clinical settings and testing multiple information-giving strategies simultaneously. The heterogeneity in this group of studies was high. Eight of the nine interventions reported a significant positive effect on objectively and subjectively measured patients' behavioral outcomes.
Using specific framing strategies for achieving specific communication goals when providing information to patients appears to have positive effects on information recall and patient health-related behaviors. The heterogeneity observed in this group of studies testifies the need for a more consistent methodological and conceptual agenda when testing medical information-giving strategies.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019115791.
向患者提供诊断和治疗信息是一项核心临床技能,但不同信息提供策略的有效性证据并不一致。本系统评价旨在调查经过实证检验的沟通策略在提供与患者相关结局信息方面的报告效果:信息回忆和(健康相关)行为。
系统检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO(Ovid)、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和相关文献,从建库至 2020 年 4 月 24 日,无限制地检索了测试医生信息提供策略的随机对照研究(PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019115791)。由两名独立评审员使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险 2 工具,识别出低选择偏倚风险的随机对照研究。主要结局指标分为患者信息回忆和行为结局(例如,饮酒量、体重减轻、筛查参与)。由于干预措施效果的数据存在高度异质性,因此这些结局以描述性方式报告,并结合研究、干预措施和信息提供策略的特征进行报告。本研究遵循 PRISMA 指南。
从 9423 篇文章中筛选出 17 篇。8 项研究,共 10 项干预措施,评估了患者信息回忆:主要在实验环境中进行,测试单一信息提供策略。其中 10 项干预措施中的 4 项报告了回忆的显著增加。9 项研究评估了行为结局,主要在现实临床环境中,同时测试了多种信息提供策略。该组研究的异质性很高。9 项干预措施中的 8 项报告对客观和主观测量的患者行为结局有显著积极影响。
在向患者提供信息时,使用特定的框架策略来实现特定的沟通目标,似乎对信息回忆和患者健康相关行为有积极影响。本研究中观察到的异质性表明,在测试医学信息提供策略时,需要更一致的方法学和概念议程。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019115791。