Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, Germany.
King's College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Psychological Interventions Clinic for outpatients with Psychosis (PICuP), London, UK.
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jan;203:66-79. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.12.014. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
Studies on cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp) have developed from evaluating generic approaches to focusing on specific symptoms. The evidence for targeted studies on delusions and hallucinations was reviewed. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of individualized CBT-based interventions focusing either on delusions or on hallucinations. Twelve suitable RCTs were identified. Four RCTs focused on delusions, of which three took a focused approach targeting mechanisms assumed causal to persecutory delusions. Eight RCTs focused on hallucinations, a common component of these studies being a focus on the perceived power imbalance between the voice(s) and the voice-hearer, to reduce distress and dysfunction. Only three RCTS were powered adequately; the remainder were pilot trials. All trials reported effect sizes against treatment-as-usual above d=0.4 on at least one primary outcome at post-therapy, with several effects in the large range. Effects on the primary outcome were maintained for five of the seven studies that had significant outcomes and reported a follow-up comparison, but most of the follow-up periods were brief. Although targeted studies are still in their infancy, the results are promising with a tendency towards higher effects compared to the small-to-moderate range found for generic CBTp. In clinical practice, CBTp will need to continue including a range of approaches that can be adapted to patients in a flexible manner according to the primary goals and prevalent combination of symptoms. However, symptom-focused and causal-interventionist approaches are informative research strategies to evaluate the efficacy of separate components or mechanisms of generic CBTp.
针对精神病的认知行为疗法(CBTp)的研究已经从评估通用方法发展到专注于特定症状。本文回顾了针对妄想和幻觉的靶向研究证据。我们纳入了检查以个体化 CBT 为基础的干预措施对妄想或幻觉的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。确定了 12 项合适的 RCT。四项 RCT 专注于妄想,其中三项采用了针对被认为与迫害妄想有关的机制的集中方法。八项 RCT 专注于幻觉,这些研究的一个共同特点是关注声音之间感知到的权力失衡,以减轻痛苦和功能障碍。只有三项 RCT 充分供电;其余的都是试点试验。所有试验均报告了治疗后至少有一种主要结局的效应大小超过 d=0.4,其中几项效应处于较大范围。在有显著结果并报告随访比较的七项研究中的五项中,对主要结局的影响得以维持,但大多数随访期较短。尽管靶向研究仍处于起步阶段,但结果令人鼓舞,与针对通用 CBTp 的小到中等范围相比,倾向于更高的效果。在临床实践中,CBTp 将需要继续包括一系列方法,可以根据主要目标和常见的症状组合以灵活的方式适应患者。然而,针对症状的和因果干预的方法是评估通用 CBTp 各个组成部分或机制的疗效的有用研究策略。