Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Am J Pathol. 2018 Apr;188(4):846-852. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
Overlapping morphologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural features make it difficult to diagnose chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) and renal oncocytoma (RO). Because ChRCC is a malignant tumor, whereas RO is a tumor with benign behavior, it is important to distinguish these two entities. We aimed to identify genetic markers that distinguish ChRCC from RO by using next-generation sequencing (NGS). NGS for hotspot mutations or gene copy number changes was performed on 12 renal neoplasms, including seven ChRCC and five RO cases. Matched normal tissues from the same patients were used to exclude germline variants. Rare hotspot mutations were found in cancer-critical genes (TP53 and PIK3CA) in ChRCC but not RO. The NGS gene copy number analysis revealed multiple abnormalities. The two most common deletions were tumor-suppressor genes RB1 and ERBB4 in ChRCC but not RO. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on 65 cases (ChRCC, n = 33; RO, n = 32) to verify hemizygous deletion of RB1 (17/33, 52%) or ERBB4 (11/33, 33%) in ChRCC, but not in RO (0/32, 0%). In total, ChRCCs (23/33, 70%) carry either a hemizygous deletion of RB1 or ERBB4. The combined use of RB1 and ERBB4 fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect deletion of these genes may offer a highly sensitive and specific assay to distinguish ChRCC from RO.
重叠的形态学、免疫组织化学和超微结构特征使得诊断嗜酸性肾细胞癌 (ChRCC) 和肾嗜酸细胞瘤 (RO) 变得困难。由于 ChRCC 是一种恶性肿瘤,而 RO 是一种具有良性行为的肿瘤,因此区分这两种实体非常重要。我们旨在通过下一代测序 (NGS) 确定区分 ChRCC 和 RO 的遗传标记。对 12 个肾肿瘤(包括 7 个 ChRCC 和 5 个 RO 病例)进行了热点突变或基因拷贝数变化的 NGS。使用来自同一患者的匹配正常组织排除种系变异。在 ChRCC 中发现了癌症关键基因 (TP53 和 PIK3CA) 的罕见热点突变,但在 RO 中没有发现。NGS 基因拷贝数分析显示存在多种异常。ChRCC 中最常见的两种缺失是抑癌基因 RB1 和 ERBB4,但在 RO 中没有发现。对 65 例病例(ChRCC,n=33;RO,n=32)进行了荧光原位杂交,以验证 ChRCC 中 RB1(17/33,52%)或 ERBB4(11/33,33%)的单等位基因缺失,但在 RO 中没有(0/32,0%)。总共有 23/33(70%)的 ChRCC 携带 RB1 或 ERBB4 的单等位基因缺失。联合使用 RB1 和 ERBB4 荧光原位杂交检测这些基因的缺失可能提供一种高度敏感和特异的方法来区分 ChRCC 和 RO。