Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Str. 46, D-01187 Dresden, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, 199 Abba Hushi Blvd., Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Mar;102:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
Fundamental questions regarding the nature and function of attentional bias (AB) to threat in the etiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remain unanswered. We tested the temporal interplay between trauma exposure, dysregulated attentional processing of threatening information pre- and post-trauma, and the development of posttraumatic intrusions.
Response time to trauma-related threat, trauma-unrelated threat, as well as to trauma-related but typically emotionally-neutral stimuli was assessed using the dot probe task before and one week after watching a violent movie scene that served as a trauma analogue. AB was analyzed as a dynamic process by means of a recently developed approach indexing momentary fluctuations of AB toward and away from emotional stimuli. Posttraumatic intrusions were measured daily over the week following analogue trauma exposure.
We found that key features of AB dynamics to trauma-related stimuli at post-, but not pre-, trauma exposure were associated with posttraumatic intrusions. Notably, these post-trauma exposure effects were specific to biased attentional processing of trauma-related but not threatening stimuli unrelated to the traumatic event. In line with a growing body of findings, pre- and post-trauma exposure traditional aggregated mean AB scores were not similarly associated with posttraumatic intrusions.
We conclude that one mechanism through which trauma exposure may contribute to the development of PTSD is through its dysregulation of attentional processing of trauma event-related cues. Future work may focus on delineating the developmental course through which attentional dysregulation post-trauma and posttraumatic intrusions unfold and interact.
关于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)发病机制中心理注意偏向(AB)对威胁的本质和功能的基本问题仍未得到解答。我们测试了创伤暴露、创伤前后威胁性信息的调节注意处理以及创伤后侵入的发展之间的时间相互作用。
使用点探测任务在观看暴力电影场景前后一周评估与创伤相关的威胁、与创伤无关的威胁以及与创伤相关但通常情绪中性的刺激的反应时间。通过最近开发的一种方法来分析 AB 的动态过程,该方法索引了对情绪刺激的 AB 瞬间波动。在模拟创伤暴露后的一周内,每天测量创伤后侵入。
我们发现,创伤后相关刺激的 AB 动态的关键特征与创伤后侵入有关,但在创伤前暴露时则没有。值得注意的是,这些创伤后暴露效应仅与对与创伤相关但与创伤事件无关的威胁性刺激的偏向注意处理有关。与越来越多的发现一致,创伤前和创伤后暴露的传统聚合平均 AB 评分与创伤后侵入没有相似的关联。
我们的结论是,创伤暴露可能导致 PTSD 发展的一种机制是通过其对与创伤事件相关线索的注意处理的失调。未来的工作可能集中在描绘创伤后和创伤后侵入的注意力失调的发展过程以及它们之间的相互作用。