Valdes-Cruz L M, Yoganathan A P, Tamura T, Tomizuka F, Woo Y R, Sahn D J
Circulation. 1986 Feb;73(2):300-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.73.2.300.
While there has been wide general acceptance of Doppler methods that use the simplified Bernoulii relationship to estimate pressure gradients across stenotic orifices, there is still ongoing controversy related to potential sources of error in the method. In this study we tested accuracy o ultrasound Doppler measurements of flow velocity when compared with the gold standard of laser light Doppler anemometry in a pulsatile flow model of pulmonic stenosis in vitro. We tested two commercially available Doppler systems and examined steered and nonsteered, parallel and off-axis and angle-corrected velocity determinations using continuous-wave and high-pulse repetition frequency (HPRF) methods. We also examined the potential range of error in the simplified Bernoulli method. One hundred and twenty individual flow states were examined with three stenotic valve orifices (3.0, 1.0, and 0.5 cm2 flow area) to measure velocities up to 620 cn/sec. A very high correlation coefficient was obtained for the comparison of laser Doppler anemometric and ultrasound velocity recordings by the nonsteered continuous-wave technique (r= .99, SEE = 17.9 cn/sec), but there was a tendency for underestimation of higher velocities when the transducer was positioned at 30 degrees and the ultrasound beam was steered so as to be parallel to the visualized flow jet (r = .98, SEE = 29.6 cn/sec). The HPRF ultrasound Doppler technique was also highly accurate in this optimized setting for measuring velocities (r = .99, SEE = 17 cm/sec), but also slightly underestimated the highest velocities. Our results also verified the accuracy of the simplified Bernoulli equation for converting instantaneous velocity measurements to estimated peak instantaneous gradient (r = .97, SEE = 8.4 mm Hg).
虽然使用简化的伯努利关系来估计跨狭窄孔口压力梯度的多普勒方法已被广泛普遍接受,但该方法潜在的误差来源仍存在争议。在本研究中,我们在体外肺动脉狭窄的脉动血流模型中,将超声多普勒流速测量的准确性与激光多普勒测速法的金标准进行了比较。我们测试了两种商用多普勒系统,并使用连续波和高脉冲重复频率(HPRF)方法,检查了定向和非定向、平行和离轴以及角度校正的速度测定。我们还研究了简化伯努利方法中潜在的误差范围。使用三个狭窄瓣膜孔口(血流面积分别为3.0、1.0和0.5平方厘米)检查了120种个体血流状态,以测量高达620厘米/秒的速度。通过非定向连续波技术对激光多普勒测速和超声速度记录进行比较,获得了非常高的相关系数(r = 0.99,标准误 = 17.9厘米/秒),但当换能器置于30度且超声束定向为与可视化血流束平行时,存在对较高速度低估的趋势(r = 0.98,标准误 = 29.6厘米/秒)。在这种优化设置下,HPRF超声多普勒技术在测量速度方面也非常准确(r = 0.99,标准误 = 17厘米/秒),但也略微低估了最高速度。我们的数据还验证了简化伯努利方程将瞬时速度测量值转换为估计的峰值瞬时梯度的准确性(r = 0.97,标准误 = 8.4毫米汞柱)。