Kalogianni Konstantina, Daffertshofer Andreas, van der Helm Frans C T, Schouten Alfred C, de Munck Jan C
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Movement Sciences & Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brain Topogr. 2018 May;31(3):498-512. doi: 10.1007/s10548-017-0617-4. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
In searching for clinical biomarkers of the somatosensory function, we studied reproducibility of somatosensory potentials (SEP) evoked by finger stimulation in healthy subjects. SEPs induced by electrical stimulation and especially after median nerve stimulation is a method widely used in the literature. It is unclear, however, if the EEG recordings after finger stimulation are reproducible within the same subject. We tested in five healthy subjects the consistency and reproducibility of responses through bootstrapping as well as test-retest recordings. We further evaluated the possibility to discriminate activity of different fingers both at electrode and at source level. The lack of consistency and reproducibility suggest responses to finger stimulation to be unreliable, even with reasonably high signal-to-noise ratio and adequate number of trials. At sources level, somatotopic arrangement of the fingers representation was only found in one of the subjects. Although finding distinct locations of the different fingers activation was possible, our protocol did not allow for non-overlapping dipole representations of the fingers. We conclude that despite its theoretical advantages, we cannot recommend the use of somatosensory potentials evoked by finger stimulation to extract clinical biomarkers.
在寻找体感功能的临床生物标志物时,我们研究了健康受试者手指刺激诱发的体感诱发电位(SEP)的可重复性。电刺激尤其是正中神经刺激诱发的SEP是文献中广泛使用的一种方法。然而,尚不清楚手指刺激后的脑电图记录在同一受试者体内是否可重复。我们通过自抽样法以及重测记录,在五名健康受试者中测试了反应的一致性和可重复性。我们还进一步评估了在电极水平和源水平区分不同手指活动的可能性。缺乏一致性和可重复性表明,即使在信噪比合理且试验次数充足的情况下,对手指刺激的反应也是不可靠的。在源水平上,仅在一名受试者中发现了手指代表区的躯体定位排列。尽管有可能找到不同手指激活的不同位置,但我们的方案不允许手指的偶极子代表区不重叠。我们得出结论,尽管手指刺激诱发的体感诱发电位具有理论优势,但我们不建议将其用于提取临床生物标志物。