Elsamadicy Aladine A, Adogwa Owoicho, Sergesketter Amanda, Lydon Emily, Bagley Carlos A, Karikari Isaac O
Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Spine Surg. 2017 Dec;3(4):609-619. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.11.08.
The optimal surgical strategy for patients with spinal metastases remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if performing an anterior column reconstruction to a posterolateral approach adds to perioperative complications.
A retrospective review of all adult patients with spinal metastases who had a posterolateral approach for resection between January 2000 and December 2008. Perioperative complications and functional outcomes were determined.
A total of 23 patients met the study criteria. Eleven patients underwent a costotransversectomy (CT) approach with anterior column reconstruction while 12 patients had a transpedicular (TP) approach without anterior column reconstruction. The mean age was 55.9 and 59.3 years in the CT and TP groups, respectively. There was no intraoperative death in either group. One death attributed to sepsis occurred in the TP group. A total of 5 (45.5%) complications occurred in the CT group and 7 (58.3%) in the TP group (P=0.68). An improvement in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale grades was observed in 3 (27.3%) patients in the CT group and 1 (8.3%) in TP group. ASIA grades remained the same in 8 (72.7%) patients in CT and 10 (83.3%) patients in TP groups. No patient worsened in the CT group whereas 1 (8.3%) patient in TP group worsened. The median survival was 12.2 months in the CT group and 19.0 months in the TP group (P=0.37).
The addition of anterior column reconstruction does not appear to be associated with more operative or perioperative complications when compared to decompression alone. Anterior column reconstruction should not be aborted in fear of increasing perioperative complications.
脊柱转移瘤患者的最佳手术策略仍不明确。本研究的目的是确定在采用后外侧入路的基础上进行前柱重建是否会增加围手术期并发症。
回顾性分析2000年1月至2008年12月期间所有采用后外侧入路进行切除的成年脊柱转移瘤患者。确定围手术期并发症和功能结果。
共有23例患者符合研究标准。11例患者采用肋骨横突切除术(CT)入路并进行前柱重建,12例患者采用经椎弓根(TP)入路且未进行前柱重建。CT组和TP组的平均年龄分别为55.9岁和59.3岁。两组均无术中死亡。TP组有1例因败血症死亡。CT组共发生5例(45.5%)并发症,TP组共发生7例(58.3%)并发症(P=0.68)。CT组3例(27.3%)患者的美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤量表等级有所改善,TP组1例(8.3%)患者有所改善。CT组8例(72.7%)患者和TP组10例(83.3%)患者的ASIA等级保持不变。CT组无患者病情恶化,而TP组有1例(8.3%)患者病情恶化。CT组的中位生存期为12.2个月,TP组为19.0个月(P=0.37)。
与单纯减压相比,增加前柱重建似乎不会增加手术或围手术期并发症。不应因担心增加围手术期并发症而放弃前柱重建。