• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)选择选项的预测因素:社会认知选择模型在性别和种族/族裔方面的元分析路径分析。

Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social-cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity.

机构信息

Department of Counseling, Higher Education, and Special Education, University of Maryland, College Park.

Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York.

出版信息

J Couns Psychol. 2018 Jan;65(1):17-35. doi: 10.1037/cou0000243.

DOI:10.1037/cou0000243
PMID:29355343
Abstract

We tested the interest and choice portion of social-cognitive career theory (SCCT; Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994) in the context of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) domains. Data from 143 studies (including 196 independent samples) conducted over a 30-year period (1983 through 2013) were subjected to meta-analytic path analyses. The interest/choice model was found to fit the data well over all samples as well as within samples composed primarily of women and men and racial/ethnic minority and majority persons. The model also accounted for large portions of the variance in interests and choice goals within each path analysis. Despite the general predictive utility of SCCT across gender and racial/ethnic groups, we did find that several parameter estimates differed by group. We present both the group similarities and differences and consider their implications for future research, intervention, and theory refinement. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

我们在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域检验了社会认知职业理论(SCCT;Lent、Brown 和 Hackett,1994)的兴趣和选择部分。这项研究的数据来自于 30 年间(1983 年至 2013 年)进行的 143 项研究(包括 196 个独立样本),并采用了元分析路径分析。结果表明,该兴趣/选择模型在所有样本以及主要由女性和男性、少数族裔和多数族裔组成的样本中都能很好地拟合数据。该模型还解释了每个路径分析中兴趣和选择目标的大部分差异。尽管 SCCT 在性别和种族/族裔群体中具有普遍的预测效用,但我们确实发现,几个参数估计因群体而异。我们同时呈现了群体的相似性和差异性,并考虑了它们对未来研究、干预和理论完善的意义。

相似文献

1
Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social-cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity.科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)选择选项的预测因素:社会认知选择模型在性别和种族/族裔方面的元分析路径分析。
J Couns Psychol. 2018 Jan;65(1):17-35. doi: 10.1037/cou0000243.
2
Meta-analytic path analysis of the social cognitive well-being model: Applicability across life domain, gender, race/ethnicity, and nationality.元分析路径分析社会认知幸福感模型:在生活领域、性别、种族/民族和国籍上的适用性。
J Couns Psychol. 2020 Nov;67(6):680-696. doi: 10.1037/cou0000431. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
3
Testing intersectionality of race/ethnicity × gender in a social-cognitive career theory model with science identity.测试社会认知职业理论模型中种族/民族×性别与科学认同的交叉性。
J Couns Psychol. 2019 Jan;66(1):30-44. doi: 10.1037/cou0000309. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
4
Influence of social cognitive and ethnic variables on academic goals of underrepresented students in science and engineering: a multiple-groups analysis.社会认知和种族变量对科学和工程领域代表性不足学生的学术目标的影响:一项多群组分析。
J Couns Psychol. 2010 Apr;57(2):205-18. doi: 10.1037/a0018608.
5
Understanding the gender gap: Social cognitive changes during an introductory stem course.理解性别差距:理工科入门课程中的社会认知变化。
J Couns Psychol. 2016 Mar;63(2):233-239. doi: 10.1037/cou0000119. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
6
Investigation of social cognitive career theory for minority recruitment in school psychology.社会认知职业理论在学校心理学中少数群体招募方面的研究。
Sch Psychol Q. 2016 Jun;31(2):241-255. doi: 10.1037/spq0000142.
7
Who Chooses STEM Careers? Using A Relative Cognitive Strength and Interest Model to Predict Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.谁会选择从事STEM职业?运用相对认知优势与兴趣模型预测科学、技术、工程和数学领域的职业。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Aug;46(8):1805-1820. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0618-8. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
8
Biomedical Science Ph.D. Career Interest Patterns by Race/Ethnicity and Gender.按种族/民族和性别划分的生物医学科学博士职业兴趣模式。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 10;9(12):e114736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114736. eCollection 2014.
9
Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests.男性与物,女性与人:兴趣的性别差异元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):859-884. doi: 10.1037/a0017364.
10
Ethnic variation in gender-STEM stereotypes and STEM participation: an intersectional approach.性别与STEM刻板印象及STEM参与度中的种族差异:一种交叉性方法
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2015 Apr;21(2):169-80. doi: 10.1037/a0037944. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing Science Career Intention: The Power of Counterspace.影响科学职业意向的因素:反空间的力量。
Innov High Educ. 2025;50(2):641-663. doi: 10.1007/s10755-024-09752-2. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
Interest and Transformative Experience as Predictors of Geoscience Academic and Career Choice.兴趣和变革性经历作为地球科学学术和职业选择的预测因素。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 18;15(2):233. doi: 10.3390/bs15020233.
3
Critical Mentorship in Undergraduate Research Experience BUILDs Science Identity and Self-Efficacy.本科研究经历中的批判性指导塑造科学身份认同和自我效能感。
Int J Sci Math Educ. 2025;23(2):321-341. doi: 10.1007/s10763-024-10476-0. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
4
"When I talk about it, my eyes light up!" Impacts of a national laboratory internship on community college student success.“当我谈论起这件事时,我的眼睛都亮了!” 国家实验室实习对社区大学生成功的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 14;20(1):e0317403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317403. eCollection 2025.
5
Validation of a Scale for Mentoring Practices Specific to Scientific Communication among Trainees.实习生科学交流特定指导实践量表的验证
UI J. 2018;9(2). Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
The Role of Contextual Variables and Structural Diversity on College Students' Engineering Self-Efficacy.情境变量和结构多样性对大学生工程自我效能感的作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 4;14(7):564. doi: 10.3390/bs14070564.
7
Research Career Intentions Among Non-Native English-Speaking Graduate and Postdoctoral Trainees in STEM-Results from Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Studies.非英语母语的理工科研究生和博士后 trainees 的研究职业意向——横断面研究和纵向研究的结果
Int Educ Stud. 2022;15(3):61-76. doi: 10.5539/ies.v15n3p61. Epub 2022 May 5.
8
Sociocultural and contextual determinants of science career goal at a community college and baccalaureate-granting institution.社区学院和授予学士学位机构中科学职业目标的社会文化及情境决定因素。
Int J Educ Vocat Guid. 2024 Apr;24(1):59-75. doi: 10.1007/s10775-022-09547-x. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
9
Upper secondary school tracking and major choices in higher education: to switch or not to switch.高中阶段的学业跟踪与高等教育中的专业选择:是否转专业
Educ Res Policy Pract. 2023 Jun 12:1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10671-023-09356-1.
10
Virtual Teaching Together: engaging parents and young children in STEM activities.共同开展虚拟教学:让家长和幼儿参与STEM活动。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 6;14:1334195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1334195. eCollection 2023.