• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精购买任务中的欢乐时光饮品特价活动。

Happy hour drink specials in the Alcohol Purchase Task.

作者信息

Kaplan Brent A, Reed Derek D

机构信息

Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Apr;26(2):156-167. doi: 10.1037/pha0000174. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1037/pha0000174
PMID:29355351
Abstract

There is strong evidence to suggest that happy hour drink specials are associated with undesirable outcomes such as increased amount of drinking, increased likelihood of being highly intoxicated, and increased likelihood of experiencing negative outcomes related to drinking (e.g., getting into fights). Public policy efforts have been made to ban or at least restrict alcohol drink specials. Research in behavioral economics-primarily demand curve analyses-has yielded valuable insights into the role of environmental effects on reinforcer consumption, especially within the context of alcohol reinforcement. The use of the Alcohol Purchase Task (APT), which asks respondents to report how many alcoholic drinks they would be willing to purchase at various prices, has contributed greatly to these efforts. The purpose of the current experiment was to determine whether self-reported consumption of alcohol on an APT changes when participants imagine a hypothetical "happy hour" scenario, akin to drink specials encountered in the real world. Results from the current experiment extend previous literature on APT vignette manipulations and provide implications for efforts to reduce problematic drinking. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

有充分证据表明,欢乐时光酒水特惠与一些不良后果相关,比如饮酒量增加、严重醉酒的可能性增加,以及出现与饮酒相关的负面后果(如打架)的可能性增加。公共政策方面已采取措施禁止或至少限制酒水特惠。行为经济学的研究——主要是需求曲线分析——为环境因素对强化物消费的作用提供了宝贵见解,尤其是在酒精强化的背景下。酒精购买任务(APT)要求受访者报告在不同价格下愿意购买多少酒精饮料,这一任务对这些研究工作有很大帮助。当前实验的目的是确定当参与者想象一个类似于现实世界中遇到的酒水特惠的假设“欢乐时光”场景时,他们在酒精购买任务中自我报告的饮酒量是否会发生变化。当前实验的结果扩展了以往关于酒精购买任务 vignette 操纵的文献,并为减少问题饮酒的努力提供了启示。(PsycINFO 数据库记录)

相似文献

1
Happy hour drink specials in the Alcohol Purchase Task.酒精购买任务中的欢乐时光饮品特价活动。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Apr;26(2):156-167. doi: 10.1037/pha0000174. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
2
Time constraints in the alcohol purchase task.酒精购买任务中的时间限制。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Jun;25(3):186-197. doi: 10.1037/pha0000110. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
A national assessment of on-premise drinking establishments near public universities: Drink prices, drink specials, indoor tobacco use, and state-level alcohol laws.全国范围内对公立大学附近的现场饮酒场所的评估:饮料价格、饮料特价、室内吸烟和州级酒精法。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Nov;46(11):2068-2076. doi: 10.1111/acer.14937. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
It's five o'clock somewhere: An examination of the association between happy hour drinking and negative consequences.某个地方现在是五点:对欢乐时光饮酒与负面后果之间关联的考察。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014 Apr 23;9:17. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-17.
5
The behavioral economics of the bottomless cup: The effects of alcohol cup price on consumption in college students.无底杯的行为经济学:酒杯价格对大学生饮酒量的影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Feb;29(1):36-47. doi: 10.1037/pha0000360. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
6
The behavioral economics of alcohol demand in Greek-affiliated college students.希腊裔大学生群体中酒精需求的行为经济学。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 Nov;45(11):2322-2334. doi: 10.1111/acer.14704. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
7
Using crowdsourcing to examine behavioral economic measures of alcohol value and proportionate alcohol reinforcement.利用众包来检验酒精价值和适度酒精强化的行为经济学指标。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Aug;25(4):314-321. doi: 10.1037/pha0000130. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Increased behavioral economic demand and craving for alcohol following a laboratory alcohol challenge.实验室酒精激发后行为经济学需求增加及对酒精的渴望
Addiction. 2015 Sep;110(9):1421-8. doi: 10.1111/add.12897. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
9
The reinforcing efficacy of alcohol mediates associations between impulsivity and negative drinking outcomes.酒精的强化作用介导了冲动性与负面饮酒结果之间的关联。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013 May;74(3):490-9. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.490.
10
The Behavioral Economics of Alcohol Demand in French and American University Students.法国和美国大学生的酒精需求行为经济学。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Mar;43(3):531-544. doi: 10.1111/acer.13954. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Overviewing the exponential model of demand and introducing a simplification that solves issues of span, scale, and zeros.概述需求的指数模型,并引入一种简化方法来解决跨度、规模和零值问题。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Apr;33(2):209-223. doi: 10.1037/pha0000754. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
2
Contextual and psychosocial factors influencing drug reward in humans: The importance of non-drug reinforcement.影响人类药物奖赏的情境和心理社会因素:非药物强化的重要性。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024 Aug;241:173802. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173802. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
3
Examining the effect of cannabis cues on cannabis demand in sleep, driving, and typical drug-use contexts.
考察大麻线索对睡眠、驾驶和典型药物使用情境中大麻需求的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Jan 1;254:111057. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111057. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
4
Notes on demand: Conceptual and empirical benefits of applying Rachlin's discounting equation to demand data.按需注释:将 Rachlin 的折扣方程应用于需求数据的概念和经验优势。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;37(1):57-71. doi: 10.1037/adb0000889. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
5
Commentary on Motschman et al.: Moving behavioral economic demand into the real world means moving beyond single schedules of reinforcement.对莫奇曼等人的评论:将行为经济需求应用到现实世界意味着超越单一强化计划。
Addiction. 2022 Jul;117(7):1897-1898. doi: 10.1111/add.15888. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
6
Alcohol demand as a predictor of drinking behavior in the natural environment.酒精需求作为自然环境中饮酒行为的预测指标。
Addiction. 2022 Jul;117(7):1887-1896. doi: 10.1111/add.15822. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
Behavioral economic methods to inform infectious disease response: Prevention, testing, and vaccination in the COVID-19 pandemic.行为经济学方法在传染病应对中的应用:COVID-19 大流行中的预防、检测和疫苗接种。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0258828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258828. eCollection 2022.
8
Applying Mixed-Effects Modeling to Behavioral Economic Demand: An Introduction.将混合效应模型应用于行为经济需求:简介
Perspect Behav Sci. 2021 Jul 21;44(2-3):333-358. doi: 10.1007/s40614-021-00299-7. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Decision Making and Alcohol: Health Policy Implications.决策与酒精:对健康政策的影响
Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Mar 1;6(1):64-71. doi: 10.1177/2372732218818587. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
(Non-) impact of task experience on behavioral economic decision-making.任务经验对行为经济决策的(非)影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Jun;30(3):338-350. doi: 10.1037/pha0000438. Epub 2021 Feb 22.