Robison Shea K.
Center for East Asian and Comparative Philosophy,City University of Hong Kong.
Politics Life Sci. 2016 Fall;35(2):30-53. doi: 10.1017/pls.2016.14.
Epigenetics, which is just beginning to attract public attention and policy discussion, challenges conventional understanding of gene-environment interaction and intergenerational inheritance and perhaps much more besides.
Does epigenetics challenge modern political ideologies?
I analyzed the narratives of obesity and epigenetics recently published in the more liberal New York Times and the more conservative Wall Street Journal. For the years 2010 through 2014, 50 articles on obesity and 29 articles on epigenetics were identified, and elements in their causal narratives were quantitatively analyzed using a well described narrative policy framework.
The narratives on obesity aligned with the two newspapers' reputed ideologies. However, the narratives on epigenetics aligned with neither ideology but freely mixed liberal and conservative elements.
This small study may serve as a starting point for broader studies of epigenetics as it comes to affect political ideologies and, in turn, public policies. The narrative mix reported here could yet prove vulnerable to ideological capture, or, more optimistically, could portend the emergence of a “third-way” narrative using epigenetics to question atomistic individualism and allowing for less divisiveness in public-health domains such as obesity.
表观遗传学刚刚开始引起公众关注和政策讨论,它挑战了对基因 - 环境相互作用和代际遗传的传统理解,或许还有更多其他方面。
表观遗传学是否挑战现代政治意识形态?
我分析了最近发表在较为自由派的《纽约时报》和较为保守派的《华尔街日报》上有关肥胖症和表观遗传学的报道。在2010年至2014年期间,确定了50篇关于肥胖症的文章和29篇关于表观遗传学的文章,并使用一个描述详尽的叙事政策框架对其因果叙事中的要素进行了定量分析。
关于肥胖症的报道与两家报纸各自闻名的意识形态相符。然而,关于表观遗传学的报道与两种意识形态均不相符,而是自由地混合了自由派和保守派的元素。
这项小型研究或许可作为更广泛研究表观遗传学如何影响政治意识形态进而影响公共政策的起点。此处报道的叙事混合情况可能仍易受到意识形态的影响,或者更乐观地说,可能预示着一种“第三条道路”叙事的出现,即利用表观遗传学质疑原子主义个人主义,并在肥胖症等公共卫生领域减少分歧。