Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Fondation Rothschild, Paris, France.
Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Bron, France.
Eur J Neurol. 2018 May;25(5):732-738. doi: 10.1111/ene.13580. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
The DAWN trial recently showed compelling evidence in treating late window and wake-up stroke patients with thrombectomy using a clinical-imaging mismatch. The aim was to evaluate the results of thrombectomy for unknown-onset strokes (UOS) treated in our centres after a diffusion weighted imaging/fluid attenuated inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch based selection.
A multicentre, cohort study was performed of consecutive UOS treated by thrombectomy between 2012 and 2016. UOS with proximal anterior circulation occlusion discovered beyond 6 h from 'last seen normal' were compared with known-onset strokes (KOS) for whom thrombectomy was started within 6 h from onset. Time intervals were recorded from first time found abnormal. Results were adjusted for age, diabetes, hypertension, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, site of occlusion, DWI Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score, intravenous thrombolysis and use of general anaesthesia.
Amongst 1246 strokes with anterior circulation occlusion treated by thrombectomy, 277 were UOS, with a 'last time seen well' beyond 6 h and DWI-FLAIR mismatch, and 865 were KOS who underwent groin puncture within 6 h. Favourable outcome was achieved less often in UOS than KOS patients (45.2% vs. 53.9%, P = 0.022). After pre-specified adjustment, this difference was not significant (adjusted relative risk 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.80-1.04; P = 0.17). No differences were found in secondary outcomes. Time intervals from first found abnormal were significantly longer in UOS.
Thrombectomy of UOS with anterior circulation occlusion and DWI-FLAIR mismatch appears to be as safe and efficient as thrombectomy of KOS within 6 h from onset. This pattern of imaging could be used for patient selection when time of onset is unknown.
最近的 DAWN 试验提供了令人信服的证据,表明对于使用临床影像不匹配的晚期和唤醒性中风患者进行血栓切除术治疗有效。本研究旨在评估我们中心对接受弥散加权成像/液体衰减反转恢复(DWI-FLAIR)不匹配后选择的不明原因起病中风(UOS)患者进行血栓切除术的结果。
本研究为多中心队列研究,纳入了 2012 年至 2016 年间接受血栓切除术治疗的连续 UOS 患者。将前循环近端闭塞且在“最后一次正常”后 6 小时以上发现的 UOS 与在发病后 6 小时内开始接受血栓切除术治疗的已知起病中风(KOS)患者进行比较。时间间隔从首次发现异常时开始记录。结果根据年龄、糖尿病、高血压、国立卫生研究院中风量表、闭塞部位、DWI 阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期 CT 评分、静脉溶栓和全身麻醉的使用情况进行调整。
在接受前循环闭塞血栓切除术治疗的 1246 例中风患者中,277 例为 UOS,“最后一次正常”时间超过 6 小时且存在 DWI-FLAIR 不匹配,865 例为 KOS,在 6 小时内行腹股沟穿刺。UOS 患者的良好预后发生率明显低于 KOS 患者(45.2% vs. 53.9%,P = 0.022)。经过预先指定的调整后,这种差异无统计学意义(调整后的相对风险 0.91;95%置信区间 0.80-1.04;P = 0.17)。次要结局无差异。UOS 的首次发现异常的时间间隔明显较长。
对于前循环闭塞和 DWI-FLAIR 不匹配的 UOS 患者进行血栓切除术与在发病后 6 小时内行血栓切除术治疗的 KOS 患者一样安全有效。当起病时间未知时,这种影像学模式可用于患者选择。