Department of Neuroradiology, INSERM U1266, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Department of Neurology, INSERM U1266, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5567-5576. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06094-y. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
We tested whether FLAIR vascular hyperintensities (FVH)-DWI mismatch could identify candidates for thrombectomy most likely to benefit from revascularization.
We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients with proximal MCA occlusion from 18 stroke centers randomized in the IV-thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy arm of the THRACE trial (2010-2015). We tested the associations between successful revascularization on digital subtraction angiography (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3) and 3-month favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2), stratified on FVH-DWI mismatch status, with secondary analyses adjusted on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and DWI lesion volume.
FVH-DWI mismatch was present in 79% of patients, with a similar prevalence at 1.5 T (80%) and 3 T (78%). Successful revascularization (74%) was more frequent in patients with FVH-DWI mismatch (63/79, 80%) than in patients without (11/21, 52%), p = 0.01. The OR of favorable outcome for revascularization were 15.05 (95% CI 3.12-72.61, p < 0.001) in patients with FVH-DWI mismatch and 0.83 (95% CI 0.15-4.64, p = 0.84) in patients without FVH-DWI mismatch (p = 0.011 for interaction). Similar results were observed after adjustment for NIHSS (OR = 12.73 [95% CI 2.69-60.41, p = 0.001] and 0.96 [95% CI 0.15-6.30, p = 0.96]) or for DWI volume (OR = 12.37 [95% CI 2.76-55.44, p = 0.001] and 0.91 [95% CI 0.16-5.33, p = 0.92]) in patients with and without FVH-DWI mismatch, respectively.
The FVH-DWI mismatch identifies patients likeliest to benefit from revascularization, irrespective of initial DWI lesion volume and clinical stroke severity, and could serve as a useful surrogate marker for penumbral evaluation.
• The FVH-DWI mismatch, defined by FLAIR vascular hyperintensities (FVH) located beyond the boundaries of the DWI lesion, is associated with large penumbra. • Among stroke patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion referred for thrombectomy, those with FVH-DWI mismatch are most likely to benefit from revascularization. • FVH-DWI mismatch provides an alternative to PWI-DWI mismatch in order to select patients who are candidates for thrombectomy.
我们旨在验证 FLAIR 血管高信号(FVH)-DWI 不匹配是否能识别出最有可能从血管再通中获益的血栓切除术候选者。
我们回顾性分析了 18 个卒中中心的 100 例接受近端 MCA 闭塞机械取栓的患者,这些患者来自 THRACE 试验(2010-2015 年)的 IV 溶栓加机械取栓组。我们根据 FVH-DWI 不匹配状态,对成功血管再通(改良的脑梗死溶栓 2b/3)与 3 个月的良好预后(改良的 Rankin 量表评分≤2)之间的相关性进行了测试,并在 NIHSS 评分和 DWI 病变体积上进行了二次分析调整。
79%的患者存在 FVH-DWI 不匹配,1.5T 和 3T 之间的发生率相似(80%和 78%)。FVH-DWI 不匹配的患者(63/79,80%)比没有 FVH-DWI 不匹配的患者(11/21,52%)更常出现血管再通(74% vs. 52%,p=0.01)。FVH-DWI 不匹配的患者血管再通的良好预后的 OR 为 15.05(95% CI 3.12-72.61,p<0.001),而没有 FVH-DWI 不匹配的患者为 0.83(95% CI 0.15-4.64,p=0.84)(FVH-DWI 不匹配与无 FVH-DWI 不匹配之间的 p 值为 0.011)。在对 NIHSS(OR=12.73 [95% CI 2.69-60.41,p=0.001] 和 0.96 [95% CI 0.15-6.30,p=0.96])或 DWI 体积(OR=12.37 [95% CI 2.76-55.44,p=0.001] 和 0.91 [95% CI 0.16-5.33,p=0.92])进行调整后,FVH-DWI 不匹配的患者和无 FVH-DWI 不匹配的患者分别观察到相似的结果。
FVH-DWI 不匹配可以识别出最有可能从血管再通中获益的患者,无论初始 DWI 病变体积和临床卒中严重程度如何,可作为评估半暗带的有用替代标志物。
FLAIR 血管高信号(FVH)-DWI 不匹配定义为 FLAIR 血管高信号(FVH)位于 DWI 病变边界之外,与较大的半暗带有关。
在接受近端大脑中动脉闭塞取栓治疗的卒中患者中,存在 FVH-DWI 不匹配的患者最有可能从血管再通中获益。
FVH-DWI 不匹配提供了一种替代 PWI-DWI 不匹配的方法,以选择适合取栓的患者。