• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血流限制与袖带宽度:对腿部血流的影响。

Blood flow restriction and cuff width: effect on blood flow in the legs.

作者信息

Mouser J Grant, Dankel Scott J, Mattocks Kevin T, Jessee Matthew B, Buckner Samuel L, Abe Takashi, Loenneke Jeremy P

机构信息

Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA.

出版信息

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 Jan 21. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12504.

DOI:10.1111/cpf.12504
PMID:29356291
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Much of the literature examining blood flow restriction in the lower body uses cuffs of differing widths. It is currently unknown whether similar relative pressures using cuffs of differing widths elicit the same blood flow response.

PURPOSE

To examine the hemodynamic responses to relative pressures using two commonly used cuffs (10 and 12 cm).

METHODS

In a random order over two laboratory visits, one cuff was applied to the right proximal thigh of the participant (men = 17, women = 14), and arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) was measured. Ultrasound measures of blood flow, mean blood velocity, peak blood velocity and artery diameter were taken from the posterior tibial artery at rest and during the application of 10% increments of the AOP.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the 10- and 12-cm cuff relating to blood flow (-0·501 ml min , SD 7·9, P = 0·728), mean blood velocity (-0·168 cm s , SD 1·7, P = 0·590), peak blood velocity (0·586 cm s , SD 11·7, P = 0·783) or artery diameter (0·003 cm, SD 0·02, P = 0·476). There was a main effect of pressure for blood flow (P<0·0005), mean blood velocity (P<0·0005), peak blood velocity (P<0·0005) and artery diameter (P = 0·005), with each decreasing with increasing pressures. Peak blood velocity increased to 60% of AOP before decreasing with increased pressure.

CONCLUSION

As long as relative pressures are applied, cuff width appears to have little to no effect on the blood flow stimulus during blood flow restriction at rest.

摘要

未标注

许多研究下肢血流限制的文献使用了不同宽度的袖带。目前尚不清楚使用不同宽度袖带时,相似的相对压力是否会引发相同的血流反应。

目的

研究使用两种常用袖带(10厘米和12厘米)对相对压力的血流动力学反应。

方法

在两次实验室访视中按随机顺序,将一个袖带应用于参与者(男性 = 17人,女性 = 14人)的右大腿近端,并测量动脉闭塞压(AOP)。在静息状态下以及以AOP的10%递增施加压力期间,从胫后动脉获取血流、平均血流速度、峰值血流速度和动脉直径的超声测量值。

结果

10厘米和12厘米袖带在血流(-0.501毫升/分钟,标准差7.9,P = 0.728)、平均血流速度(-0.168厘米/秒,标准差1.7,P = 0.590)、峰值血流速度(0.586厘米/秒,标准差11.7,P = 0.783)或动脉直径(0.003厘米,标准差0.02,P = 0.476)方面无显著差异。压力对血流(P<0.0005)、平均血流速度(P<0.0005)、峰值血流速度(P<0.0005)和动脉直径(P = 0.005)有主要影响,各指标均随压力增加而降低。峰值血流速度在随压力增加而降低之前增加到AOP的60%。

结论

只要施加相对压力,在静息血流限制期间,袖带宽度似乎对血流刺激几乎没有影响。

相似文献

1
Blood flow restriction and cuff width: effect on blood flow in the legs.血流限制与袖带宽度:对腿部血流的影响。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 Jan 21. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12504.
2
A tale of three cuffs: the hemodynamics of blood flow restriction.三种袖带的故事:血流限制的血流动力学
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Jul;117(7):1493-1499. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3644-7. Epub 2017 May 13.
3
Blood flow restriction pressure for narrow cuffs (5 cm) cannot be estimated with precision.对于较窄的袖带(5 厘米),无法精确估计血流限制压力。
Physiol Meas. 2024 Feb 26;45(2). doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ad278d.
4
The Influence of Cuff Width, Sex, and Race on Arterial Occlusion: Implications for Blood Flow Restriction Research.袖带宽度、性别和种族对动脉闭塞的影响:对血流限制研究的启示。
Sports Med. 2016 Jun;46(6):913-21. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0473-5.
5
Influence of cuff stiffness on hemodynamics and perceived cuff pressure in the upper extremities in males and females: implications for practical blood flow restriction training.袖带硬度对男性和女性上肢血流动力学及感知袖带压力的影响:对实际血流限制训练的启示
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct 19;15(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00745-w.
6
Body position and cuff size influence lower limb arterial occlusion pressure and its predictors: implications for standardizing the pressure applied in training with blood flow restriction.身体姿势和袖带尺寸会影响下肢动脉闭塞压及其预测因素:对规范血流限制训练中所施加压力具有启示意义。
Front Physiol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1446963. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1446963. eCollection 2024.
7
The Effect of Cuff Width for Determining Limb Occlusion Pressure: A Comparison of Blood Flow Restriction Devices.袖带宽度对确定肢体阻断压力的影响:血流限制装置的比较
Int J Exerc Sci. 2019 Jan 1;12(3):136-143. doi: 10.70252/RWVU7100. eCollection 2019.
8
Effects of cuff width on arterial occlusion: implications for blood flow restricted exercise.袖带宽度对动脉闭塞的影响:对血流限制运动的启示。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Aug;112(8):2903-12. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2266-8. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
9
The impact of cuff width on perceptual responses during and following blood flow restricted walking exercise.袖口宽度对血流限制步行运动期间和之后感知反应的影响。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2022 Jan;42(1):29-34. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12732. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
10
Effect of cuff type on arterial occlusion.袖带类型对动脉闭塞的影响。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013 Jul;33(4):325-7. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12035. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of blood flow restriction combined with high-load training on muscle strength and sports performance in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血流限制联合高负荷训练对运动员肌肉力量和运动表现的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Physiol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1603568. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1603568. eCollection 2025.
2
Muscle strength adaptation between high-load resistance training versus low-load blood flow restriction training with different cuff pressure characteristics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同袖带压力特征下高负荷抗阻训练与低负荷血流限制训练之间的肌肉力量适应性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Physiol. 2023 Aug 25;14:1244292. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1244292. eCollection 2023.
3
Acute Blood Flow Responses to Varying Blood Flow Restriction Pressures in the Lower Limb.
下肢对不同血流限制压力的急性血流反应。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Jan 1;16(2):118-128. doi: 10.70252/IRPL4226. eCollection 2023.
4
Beneath the cuff: Often overlooked and under-reported blood flow restriction device features and their potential impact on practice-A review of the current state of the research.袖带之下:常被忽视且报道不足的血流限制装置特点及其对临床实践的潜在影响——当前研究现状综述
Front Physiol. 2023 Mar 30;14:1089065. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1089065. eCollection 2023.
5
Physiological adaptations and myocellular stress in short-term, high-frequency blood flow restriction training: A scoping review.短期、高频血流限制训练中的生理适应和肌细胞应激:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279811. eCollection 2022.
6
A Study to Identify the Optimum Forearm Floss Band Intensity in 29 Young Adults Performing Blood Flow Restriction Training.一项针对 29 名年轻成年人进行血流限制训练时,确定最佳前臂弹性绳强度的研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Mar 28;28:e935771. doi: 10.12659/MSM.935771.
7
Differences in Femoral Artery Occlusion Pressure between Sexes and Dominant and Non-Dominant Legs.性别和优势与非优势腿之间股动脉闭塞压的差异。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Aug 24;57(9):863. doi: 10.3390/medicina57090863.
8
The addition of blood flow restriction to resistance exercise in individuals with knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血流限制联合抗阻训练应用于膝痛患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Nov-Dec;24(6):465-478. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Strengthening the Brain-Is Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction an Effective Strategy for Cognitive Improvement?强化大脑——采用血流限制的抗阻训练是改善认知的有效策略吗?
J Clin Med. 2018 Oct 9;7(10):337. doi: 10.3390/jcm7100337.