• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

323例患者在接受颈动脉支架置入术后进行心脏直视手术:一年的结果及影响因素。

Carotid artery stenting followed by open heart surgery in 323 patients: One-year results and influencing factors.

作者信息

Dong Hui, Che Wuqiang, Jiang Xiongjing, Peng Meng, Zou Yubao, Xiong Hongliang, Chen Yang, Xu Bo, Yang Yuejin, Gao Runlin

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(S1):632-638. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27486. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.27486
PMID:29356307
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate 1-year results and influencing factors of carotid artery stenting (CAS) before open heart surgery (OHS).

BACKGROUND

Currently, the clinical outcomes and influencing factors of CAS followed by OHS still remain controversial.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-three consecutive patients scheduled for CAS and OHS were enrolled in this study. The primary endpoint was a composite of major stroke, myocardial infarction, or death within 1 year after CAS.

RESULTS

The incidence of the primary endpoint was 5.6% (18/323). The Cox regression analysis revealed that an interval of ≤5 days between CAS and OHS (HR, 4.85, 95% CI, 1.87-12.58; P = 0.001), congestive heart failure (HR, 4.08, 95% CI, 1.45-11.51; P = 0.008), and renal insufficiency (HR, 4.56, 95% CI, 1.28-16.32; P = 0.020) could independently predict the incidence of the primary endpoint. The rate of the primary endpoint from CAS to 30 days after OHS was 4.6% (15/323). An interval of ≤5 days between CAS and OHS (OR, 4.51, 95% CI, 1.52-13.36; P = 0.007) and congestive heart failure (OR, 5.32, 95% CI, 1.63-17.43; P = 0.006) were identified as independent risk factors for the primary endpoint rate from CAS to 30 days after OHS by logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

CAS followed by OHS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with concomitant carotid and cardiac disease within 1-year follow up. The interval between CAS and OHS, congestive heart failure, and renal insufficiency could obviously influence the 1-year results.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估心脏直视手术(OHS)前进行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的1年结果及影响因素。

背景

目前,OHS后行CAS的临床结局及影响因素仍存在争议。

方法

本研究纳入了323例连续计划行CAS及OHS的患者。主要终点为CAS后1年内发生的主要卒中、心肌梗死或死亡的复合事件。

结果

主要终点的发生率为5.6%(18/323)。Cox回归分析显示,CAS与OHS之间的间隔≤5天(HR,4.85,95%CI,1.87 - 12.58;P = 0.001)、充血性心力衰竭(HR,4.08,95%CI,1.45 - 11.51;P = 0.008)和肾功能不全(HR,4.56,95%CI,1.28 - 16.32;P = 0.020)可独立预测主要终点的发生率。从CAS至OHS后30天主要终点的发生率为4.6%(15/323)。通过逻辑回归分析确定,CAS与OHS之间的间隔≤5天(OR,4.51,95%CI,1.52 - 13.36;P = 0.007)和充血性心力衰竭(OR,5.32,95%CI,1.63 - 17.43;P = 0.006)是从CAS至OHS后30天主要终点发生率的独立危险因素。

结论

OHS前先行CAS在1年随访期内对合并颈动脉和心脏疾病的患者是一种安全有效的治疗方法。CAS与OHS之间的间隔、充血性心力衰竭和肾功能不全可明显影响1年结果。

相似文献

1
Carotid artery stenting followed by open heart surgery in 323 patients: One-year results and influencing factors.323例患者在接受颈动脉支架置入术后进行心脏直视手术:一年的结果及影响因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(S1):632-638. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27486. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
2
The interval between carotid artery stenting and open heart surgery is related to perioperative complications.颈动脉支架置入术与心脏直视手术之间的间隔时间与围手术期并发症有关。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar;87 Suppl 1:564-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26408. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
3
Long-term results of carotid stenting and risk factors in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis undergoing subsequent cardiac surgery.严重颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术后再行心脏手术的长期结果及相关危险因素分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 15;93(3):E134-E139. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27947. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
4
One-day, sequential carotid artery stenting followed by cardiac surgery in patients with severe carotid and cardiac disease.一天内,严重颈动脉和心脏疾病患者行颈动脉支架置入术序贯心脏手术。
Vasc Med. 2019 Oct;24(5):431-438. doi: 10.1177/1358863X19872547. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
5
Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stents Should Be Used with Caution in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者,经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术应谨慎使用。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;54:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
6
Statins reduce mortality and failure to rescue after carotid artery stenting.他汀类药物可降低颈动脉支架置入术后的死亡率和救援失败率。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.424. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
7
A direct comparison of early and late outcomes with three approaches to carotid revascularization and open heart surgery.三种颈动脉血运重建术与开心手术早期和晚期结果的直接比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 19;62(21):1948-1956. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.094. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
8
Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice depending on patient age.临床实践中根据患者年龄进行颈动脉支架置入术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 1;90(3):451-460. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27127. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
Carotid Stenting Prior to Coronary Bypass Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉搭桥手术前的颈动脉支架置入术:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;53(3):309-319. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较疗效
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):275-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002336. Epub 2016 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Same-Day Carotid Artery Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.颈动脉支架置入术同期冠状动脉旁路移植术
Tex Heart Inst J. 2023 Jan 1;50(1). doi: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7781.
2
Eptifibatide bridging therapy for staged carotid artery stenting and cardiac surgery: Safety and feasibility.依替巴肽桥接治疗分期颈动脉支架置入术和心脏手术:安全性和可行性。
Vascular. 2024 Apr;32(2):433-439. doi: 10.1177/17085381221084813. Epub 2022 Mar 26.