• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一天内,严重颈动脉和心脏疾病患者行颈动脉支架置入术序贯心脏手术。

One-day, sequential carotid artery stenting followed by cardiac surgery in patients with severe carotid and cardiac disease.

机构信息

Department of Invasive Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Vasc Med. 2019 Oct;24(5):431-438. doi: 10.1177/1358863X19872547. Epub 2019 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1177/1358863X19872547
PMID:31543030
Abstract

Optimal management of patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis concurrent with severe cardiac disease remains undefined. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the one-day, sequential approach by carotid artery stenting (CAS) immediately followed by cardiac surgery. The study included 70 consecutive patients with symptomatic > 50% or ⩾ 80% asymptomatic ICA stenosis coexisting with severe coronary/valve disease, who underwent one-day, sequential CAS + cardiac surgery. The majority of patients (85.7%) had CSS class III or IV angina and 10% had non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. The EuroSCORE II risk was 2.4% (IQR 1.69-3.19%). All CAS procedures were performed according to the 'tailored' algorithm with a substantial use of proximal neuroprotection devices of 44.3%. Closed-cell (75.7%) and mesh-covered (18.6%) stents were implanted in most cases. The majority of patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (88.6%) or isolated valve replacement (7.1%). No major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) occurred at the CAS stage. There were three (4.3%) perioperative MACCE: one myocardial infarction and two deaths. All MACCE were related to cardiac surgery and were due to the high surgical risk profile of the patients. Up to 30 days, no further MACCE were observed. No perioperative or 30-day neurological complications occurred. In this patient series, one-day, sequential CAS and cardiac surgery was relatively safe and did not result in neurological complications. Thus, a strategy of preoperative CAS could be considered for patients with severe or symptomatic ICA stenosis who require urgent cardiac surgery.

摘要

对于同时患有严重心脏疾病的颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄患者,其最佳治疗管理仍未确定。本研究旨在评估经颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)一日序贯治疗方案的安全性和可行性,该方案是指在同一天内先进行颈动脉支架置入术,随后紧接着进行心脏手术。该研究纳入了 70 例有症状(狭窄程度>50%或无症状性>80%)且同时合并严重冠状动脉/瓣膜疾病的 ICA 狭窄患者,这些患者均接受了一日序贯颈动脉支架置入术+心脏手术治疗。大多数患者(85.7%)患有 CSS III 或 IV 级心绞痛,10%的患者患有非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死。EuroSCORE II 风险评分为 2.4%(IQR 1.69-3.19%)。所有的 CAS 手术均按照“个体化”算法进行,近端神经保护装置的使用率为 44.3%。大多数情况下植入的是闭孔(75.7%)和网孔(18.6%)支架。大多数患者接受的是单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术(88.6%)或单纯瓣膜置换术(7.1%)。在 CAS 阶段未发生重大不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)。有 3 例(4.3%)围手术期 MACCE:1 例心肌梗死和 2 例死亡。所有 MACCE 均与心脏手术相关,是由于患者的高手术风险。在 30 天内,未观察到其他 MACCE。无围手术期或 30 天内的神经系统并发症发生。在本患者系列中,一日序贯颈动脉支架置入术和心脏手术相对安全,不会导致神经系统并发症。因此,对于需要紧急心脏手术的严重或有症状性 ICA 狭窄患者,可以考虑术前进行颈动脉支架置入术的策略。

相似文献

1
One-day, sequential carotid artery stenting followed by cardiac surgery in patients with severe carotid and cardiac disease.一天内,严重颈动脉和心脏疾病患者行颈动脉支架置入术序贯心脏手术。
Vasc Med. 2019 Oct;24(5):431-438. doi: 10.1177/1358863X19872547. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
2
Synchronous carotid artery stenting and open heart surgery.同期颈动脉支架置入术与心脏直视手术。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5):1237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.049. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
3
One stage carotid artery stenting and open heart surgery: a novel approach.一期颈动脉支架置入术与心脏直视手术:一种新方法。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2011 Aug;52(4):539-43.
4
Early results after synchronous carotid stent placement and coronary artery bypass graft in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者同期颈动脉支架置入术和冠状动脉旁路移植术后的早期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2 Suppl):58S-63S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.06.116.
5
Carotid Stenting Prior to Coronary Bypass Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉搭桥手术前的颈动脉支架置入术:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;53(3):309-319. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
6
Synchronous versus staged carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass graft for patients with concomitant severe coronary and carotid artery stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.同步与分期颈动脉支架置入术及冠状动脉搭桥术治疗合并严重冠状动脉和颈动脉狭窄患者的系统评价与荟萃分析
Vascular. 2020 Dec;28(6):808-815. doi: 10.1177/1708538120929506. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
7
Long-term results of carotid stenting and risk factors in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis undergoing subsequent cardiac surgery.严重颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术后再行心脏手术的长期结果及相关危险因素分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 15;93(3):E134-E139. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27947. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
8
Carotid artery stenting followed by open heart surgery in 323 patients: One-year results and influencing factors.323例患者在接受颈动脉支架置入术后进行心脏直视手术:一年的结果及影响因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(S1):632-638. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27486. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
9
The interval between carotid artery stenting and open heart surgery is related to perioperative complications.颈动脉支架置入术与心脏直视手术之间的间隔时间与围手术期并发症有关。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar;87 Suppl 1:564-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26408. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
10
Staged carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery versus isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in concomitant coronary and carotid disease.分期颈动脉支架置入术与冠状动脉搭桥术对比单纯冠状动脉搭桥术治疗合并冠心病和颈动脉疾病
J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 Jan;25(1):8-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Misclassification of carotid stenosis severity with area stenosis-based evaluation by computed tomography angiography: impact on erroneous indication to revascularization or patient (lesion) migration to a higher guideline recommendation class as per ESC/ESVS/ESO/SVS and CMS-FDA thresholds.通过计算机断层血管造影术基于面积狭窄的评估对颈动脉狭窄严重程度的错误分类:对根据欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲血管外科学会/欧洲卒中组织/血管外科学会和美国医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心/美国食品药品监督管理局阈值进行的血管重建错误指征或患者(病变)迁移至更高指南推荐类别的影响。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2022 Dec;18(4):500-513. doi: 10.5114/aic.2023.125610. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
2
Clinical Outcomes of Extracranial Carotid Artery-Related Stroke Eligible for Mechanical Reperfusion on Top of Per-Guidelines Thrombolytic Therapy: Analysis from a 6-Month Consecutive Patient Sample in 2 Centers.机械再通治疗联合指南推荐溶栓治疗对适合的颅外颈动脉相关卒中患者的临床结局:2 个中心连续 6 个月患者样本分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Dec 1;28:e938549. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938549.