Department of Invasive Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Vasc Med. 2019 Oct;24(5):431-438. doi: 10.1177/1358863X19872547. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
Optimal management of patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis concurrent with severe cardiac disease remains undefined. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the one-day, sequential approach by carotid artery stenting (CAS) immediately followed by cardiac surgery. The study included 70 consecutive patients with symptomatic > 50% or ⩾ 80% asymptomatic ICA stenosis coexisting with severe coronary/valve disease, who underwent one-day, sequential CAS + cardiac surgery. The majority of patients (85.7%) had CSS class III or IV angina and 10% had non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. The EuroSCORE II risk was 2.4% (IQR 1.69-3.19%). All CAS procedures were performed according to the 'tailored' algorithm with a substantial use of proximal neuroprotection devices of 44.3%. Closed-cell (75.7%) and mesh-covered (18.6%) stents were implanted in most cases. The majority of patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (88.6%) or isolated valve replacement (7.1%). No major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) occurred at the CAS stage. There were three (4.3%) perioperative MACCE: one myocardial infarction and two deaths. All MACCE were related to cardiac surgery and were due to the high surgical risk profile of the patients. Up to 30 days, no further MACCE were observed. No perioperative or 30-day neurological complications occurred. In this patient series, one-day, sequential CAS and cardiac surgery was relatively safe and did not result in neurological complications. Thus, a strategy of preoperative CAS could be considered for patients with severe or symptomatic ICA stenosis who require urgent cardiac surgery.
对于同时患有严重心脏疾病的颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄患者,其最佳治疗管理仍未确定。本研究旨在评估经颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)一日序贯治疗方案的安全性和可行性,该方案是指在同一天内先进行颈动脉支架置入术,随后紧接着进行心脏手术。该研究纳入了 70 例有症状(狭窄程度>50%或无症状性>80%)且同时合并严重冠状动脉/瓣膜疾病的 ICA 狭窄患者,这些患者均接受了一日序贯颈动脉支架置入术+心脏手术治疗。大多数患者(85.7%)患有 CSS III 或 IV 级心绞痛,10%的患者患有非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死。EuroSCORE II 风险评分为 2.4%(IQR 1.69-3.19%)。所有的 CAS 手术均按照“个体化”算法进行,近端神经保护装置的使用率为 44.3%。大多数情况下植入的是闭孔(75.7%)和网孔(18.6%)支架。大多数患者接受的是单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术(88.6%)或单纯瓣膜置换术(7.1%)。在 CAS 阶段未发生重大不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)。有 3 例(4.3%)围手术期 MACCE:1 例心肌梗死和 2 例死亡。所有 MACCE 均与心脏手术相关,是由于患者的高手术风险。在 30 天内,未观察到其他 MACCE。无围手术期或 30 天内的神经系统并发症发生。在本患者系列中,一日序贯颈动脉支架置入术和心脏手术相对安全,不会导致神经系统并发症。因此,对于需要紧急心脏手术的严重或有症状性 ICA 狭窄患者,可以考虑术前进行颈动脉支架置入术的策略。