• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马的进食性咀嚼类似于反刍,但不同于牛和骆驼的进食性咀嚼。

Ingestive mastication in horses resembles rumination but not ingestive mastication in cattle and camels.

机构信息

School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate Reading, United Kingdom.

ETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitätsstr. 2, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol. 2017 Feb;327(2-3):98-109. doi: 10.1002/jez.2075. Epub 2017 May 17.

DOI:10.1002/jez.2075
PMID:29356397
Abstract

Horses achieve a higher degree of particle size reduction through ingestive mastication than functional ruminants. We characterized mastication using chew-monitoring halters (RumiWatch) in six domestic horses, cattle, and Bactrian camels each. All animals were offered grass hay of the same batch for 15 min. In cattle and camels, measurements were continued after eating until rumination was observed. Except for one horse, 96% of the horses' ingestive mastication data were identified as "rumination" by the proprietary RumiWatch algorithm, whereas ingestion and rumination by cattle and camels were mostly classified correctly. There were no systematic differences between cattle and camels. In cattle and camels, ingestive mastication was less regular than rumination, indicated by significantly higher standard deviations of chewing peak intervals, peak heights, and peak breadths in intraindividual comparisons. The average standard deviations of these measures were lower in horses than in cattle and camel ingestive mastication, indicating a more consistent chewing pattern in horses. Horse values were similar to those of rumination mastication, suggesting equally regular chewing motions. Regular, rhythmic chewing represents a common feature of horses and functional ruminants, but the less uniform ingestive mastication in functional ruminants represents a deviating pattern, the adaptive value of which remains unclear. In particular, it does not appear to promote a higher ingestion rate. A potential cause may be the avoidance of high tooth wear rates by delaying a more regular, systematic mastication until ingesta has been softened and the grit has been washed off in the forestomach.

摘要

马通过摄食咀嚼达到比功能性反刍动物更高的颗粒减小程度。我们使用咀嚼监测项圈(RumiWatch)对六匹家马、牛和双峰驼进行了咀嚼特征分析。所有动物均喂食同一批次的干草 15 分钟。在牛和骆驼中,进食后继续测量,直到观察到反刍为止。除一匹马外,专有 RumiWatch 算法将 96%的马摄食咀嚼数据识别为“反刍”,而牛和骆驼的摄食和反刍大多被正确分类。牛和骆驼之间没有系统差异。在牛和骆驼中,摄食咀嚼不如反刍有规律,个体间比较时,咀嚼峰间隔、峰高和峰宽的标准差明显较高。这些措施的平均标准差在马中低于牛和骆驼的摄食咀嚼,表明马的咀嚼模式更一致。马的值与反刍咀嚼相似,表明咀嚼动作同样规则。有规律、有节奏的咀嚼是马和功能性反刍动物的共同特征,但功能性反刍动物不那么规则的摄食咀嚼是一种偏离模式,其适应价值尚不清楚。特别是,它似乎并没有促进更高的摄食率。一个潜在的原因可能是为了避免高牙齿磨损率,直到食糜变软并在前胃中冲洗掉沙砾,才会进行更规则、系统的咀嚼。

相似文献

1
Ingestive mastication in horses resembles rumination but not ingestive mastication in cattle and camels.马的进食性咀嚼类似于反刍,但不同于牛和骆驼的进食性咀嚼。
J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol. 2017 Feb;327(2-3):98-109. doi: 10.1002/jez.2075. Epub 2017 May 17.
2
Comparative ingestive mastication in domestic horses and cattle: a pilot investigation.家马和牛的摄食性咀嚼比较:一项初步研究。
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2010 Dec;94(6):e402-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01030.x.
3
Mandibular corpus bone strains during mastication in goats (Capra hircus): a comparison of ingestive and rumination chewing.山羊(Capra hircus)咀嚼过程中下颌体骨的应变:摄食咀嚼和反刍咀嚼的比较。
Arch Oral Biol. 2011 Oct;56(10):960-71. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.02.014. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
4
Evaluation and validation of an automatic jaw movement recorder (RumiWatch) for ingestive and rumination behaviors of dairy cows during grazing and supplementation.评估和验证一种自动记录奶牛采食和反刍行为的设备(RumiWatch)在放牧和补饲期间的有效性。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Mar;101(3):2463-2475. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12305. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
5
Chewing activities and oesophageal motility during feed intake, rumination and eructation in camels.骆驼在采食、反刍和嗳气过程中的咀嚼活动与食管运动
J Comp Physiol B. 2006 Feb;176(2):117-24. doi: 10.1007/s00360-005-0027-x. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
6
Quantitative aspects of the ruminating process in giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis) fed with different diets.不同日粮喂养的长颈鹿(Giraffa camelopardalis)反刍过程的定量研究
Zoo Biol. 2017 Dec;36(6):407-412. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21386. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
In Vivo Pattern Classification of Ingestive Behavior in Ruminants Using FBG Sensors and Machine Learning.使用光纤布拉格光栅(FBG)传感器和机器学习对反刍动物摄食行为进行体内模式分类
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Nov 11;15(11):28456-71. doi: 10.3390/s151128456.
8
Eating and ruminating behavior of steers fed Coastal Bermudagrass hay at four levels.以四个水平饲喂海岸百慕大草干草的阉牛的采食与反刍行为。
J Anim Sci. 1989 Dec;67(12):3410-8. doi: 10.2527/jas1989.67123410x.
9
Chewing patterns in horses during the intake of variable quantities of two pelleted compound feeds differing in their physical characteristics only.马在摄入两种仅物理特性不同的颗粒状复合饲料时的咀嚼模式。
Res Vet Sci. 2019 Aug;125:189-194. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
Forage ingestion: effects of sward characteristics and body size.牧草采食:草地特征与体型大小的影响
J Anim Sci. 1988 Sep;66(9):2380-92. doi: 10.2527/jas1988.6692380x.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing masticatory motion of dogs using optical and electromagnetic motion tracking.利用光学和电磁运动跟踪技术表征犬类的咀嚼运动。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jul 3;12:1625335. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1625335. eCollection 2025.
2
Teeth and the gastrointestinal tract in mammals: when 1 + 1 = 3.哺乳动物的牙齿和胃肠道:何时 1+1=3。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Dec 4;378(1891):20220544. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0544. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
3
Masticatory myology of the llama (Lama glama, Camelidae) and comparisons with other camelids and euungulates.
骆马(Lama glama,骆驼科)的咀嚼肌与其他骆驼科动物和有蹄类动物的比较。
J Anat. 2023 Nov;243(5):770-785. doi: 10.1111/joa.13891. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
4
The Ruminant sorting mechanism protects teeth from abrasives.反刍动物的分类机制能保护牙齿免受磨损。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 6;119(49):e2212447119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212447119. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
5
Preliminary evidence for a forestomach washing mechanism in llamas ().骆驼科动物瘤胃冲洗机制的初步证据()。
Mamm Biol. 2021;101(6):941-948. doi: 10.1007/s42991-021-00142-1. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
6
Macrowear effects of external quartz abrasives of different size and concentration in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).不同粒径和浓度的外源石英磨料对家兔(Oryctolagus cuniculus)的宏观磨损效应。
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2022 Dec;338(8):586-597. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.23104. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
7
Increasing food intake affects digesta retention, digestibility and gut fill but not chewing efficiency in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).增加采食量影响家兔(Oryctolagus cuniculus)食糜停留时间、消化率和肠道充盈度,但不影响咀嚼效率。
J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol. 2021 Aug;335(7):614-622. doi: 10.1002/jez.2505. Epub 2021 Jul 12.