Weisberg Asher, Park Pauline, Cherry-Bukowiec Jill R
1 Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
2 Trauma Burn ICU, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Feb/Mar;19(2):142-146. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.221. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
The use of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock, a practice put forth by Dr. Rivers et al. in 2001, ushered in a new era of targeted sepsis therapy. After its publication, several further studies helped validate the protocolized approach to sepsis management, ultimately leading to its incorporation into the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. Since that time, however, a trio of large multi-center randomized controlled trials have taken place to evaluate the efficacy of EGDT when compared with usual care and have demonstrated that strict adherence to the entirety of the original EGDT protocol is unnecessary for improved outcomes. Some recommendations, such as higher goal hemoglobin and hematocrit levels and liberal crystalloid fluid resuscitation, are likely harmful. Despite controversy over a number of the recommendations, early identification of sepsis, source control, and prompt empiric antibiotic administration remain the mainstay of treatment for patients with sepsis and septic shock.
2001年里弗斯博士等人提出的早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)用于严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的管理,开创了脓毒症靶向治疗的新时代。该理论发表后,多项进一步研究有助于验证脓毒症管理的规范化方法,最终使其纳入《拯救脓毒症运动》指南。然而,自那时以来,已经进行了三项大型多中心随机对照试验,以评估EGDT与常规治疗相比的疗效,结果表明,严格遵循整个原始EGDT方案对于改善预后并非必要。一些建议,如更高的血红蛋白和血细胞比容目标水平以及大量晶体液复苏,可能有害。尽管对许多建议存在争议,但脓毒症的早期识别、源头控制和及时经验性抗生素给药仍然是脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者治疗的主要支柱。