• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业价值观能力评估:将学生书面作业与文献研究结果进行比较

Professional Values Competency Evaluation: Comparing Student Written Assignments to Literature Findings.

作者信息

Elliott Annette, Byrne Michelle

机构信息

About the Authors Annette Elliott, EdD, RN, CNE, is prelicensure undergraduate nursing student educator at Inver Hills Community College, Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota. Michelle Byrne, PhD, RN, CNE, CNOR, is professor, University of West Georgia Tanner Health System School of Nursing, Carrollton, Georgia. For more information, contact Dr. Elliott at

出版信息

Nurs Educ Perspect. 2018 May/Jun;39(3):169-171. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000262.

DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000262
PMID:29356754
Abstract

Nurse educators have had no clear evidence-based method to evaluate student competency related to professional values. This article describes a comparative analysis in which the list of professional values identified in a research study of undergraduate prelicensure nursing student assignments was compared with a list identified in an integrative review of nursing literature. Comparative analysis allowed for a categorization of professional values that were either congruent between student assignments and literature, exclusively evident in literature, or exclusively evident in student assignments. Findings may contribute to curricular process improvements promoting professional values development in undergraduate nursing students.

摘要

护理教育工作者一直没有基于明确证据的方法来评估与专业价值观相关的学生能力。本文描述了一项比较分析,即将本科护理专业预执照学生作业研究中确定的专业价值观列表与护理文献综合综述中确定的列表进行比较。比较分析允许对专业价值观进行分类,这些价值观在学生作业和文献中要么是一致的,要么仅在文献中明显,要么仅在学生作业中明显。研究结果可能有助于改进课程过程,促进本科护理学生的专业价值观发展。

相似文献

1
Professional Values Competency Evaluation: Comparing Student Written Assignments to Literature Findings.专业价值观能力评估:将学生书面作业与文献研究结果进行比较
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2018 May/Jun;39(3):169-171. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000262.
2
Professional Values Competency Evaluation for Students Enrolled in a Concept-Based Curriculum.对参加基于概念的课程的学生进行专业价值观能力评估。
J Nurs Educ. 2017 Jan 1;56(1):12-21. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20161219-04.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Nursing student-faculty writing partnerships at the baccalaureate level: Research brief.本科阶段护理专业学生与教师的写作合作:研究简报
Nurs Forum. 2019 Jul;54(3):410-413. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12348. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
5
General and professional values of student nurses and nurse educators.护生和护理教育者的一般和专业价值观。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Mar;74(3):666-676. doi: 10.1111/jan.13473. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
6
Student-faculty relationships and its impact on academic outcomes.师生关系及其对学业成绩的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
7
Creating a culture of evidence in nursing education using student portfolios.利用学生档案袋在护理教育中营造循证文化。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2012 Jun 9;9:/j/ijnes.2012.9.issue-1/1548-923X.2415/1548-923X.2415.xml. doi: 10.1515/1548-923X.2415.
8
Addressing ethical concerns arising in nursing and midwifery students' reflective assignments.解决护理和助产学学生反思性作业中出现的伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Sep;25(6):773-785. doi: 10.1177/0969733016674767. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
9
Meaningful and engaging teaching techniques for student nurses: a literature review.有意义且吸引学生的护士教学技巧:文献回顾。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2013 Jul;13(4):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 15.
10
Pedagogical principles underpinning undergraduate Nurse Education in the UK: A review.支撑英国本科护理教育的教学原则:一项综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 May;40:118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 24.