• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察暑期 STEM 项目中选择、情感和参与度之间的关系。

Examining Relationships among Choice, Affect, and Engagement in Summer STEM Programs.

机构信息

Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology and Special Education, Michigan State University, Erickson Hall, 620 Farm Lane Rm. 447, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.

Afterschool and Youth Development, American Institutes for Research, 1120 E. Diehl Road, Suite 200, Naperville, IL, 60563, USA.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Jun;47(6):1178-1191. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0814-9. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-018-0814-9
PMID:29356926
Abstract

Out-of-school time programs focused on science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) have proliferated recently because they are seen as having potential to appeal to youth and enhance STEM interest. Although such programs are not mandatory, youth are not always involved in making the choice about their participation and it is unclear whether youth's involvement in the choice to attend impacts their program experiences. Using data collected from experience sampling, traditional surveys, and video recordings, we explore relationships among youth's choice to attend out-of-school time programs (measured through a pre-survey) and their experience of affect (i.e., youth experience sampling ratings of happiness and excitement) and engagement (i.e., youth experience sampling ratings of concentration and effort) during program activities. Data were collected from a racially and ethnically diverse sample of 10-16 year old youth (n = 203; 50% female) enrolled in nine different summer STEM programs targeting underserved youth. Multilevel analysis indicated that choice and affect are independently and positively associated with momentary engagement. Though choice to enroll was a significant predictor of momentary engagement, positive affective experiences during the program may compensate for any decrements to engagement associated with lack of choice. Together, these findings have implications for researchers, parents, and educators and administrators of out-of-school time programming.

摘要

课外时间的科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)项目最近大量涌现,因为它们被认为具有吸引年轻人并增强 STEM 兴趣的潜力。尽管这些项目不是强制性的,但年轻人并不总是参与选择参加,也不清楚年轻人参与选择参加是否会影响他们的项目体验。我们使用经验抽样、传统调查和视频记录收集的数据,探讨了课外时间项目(通过预调查衡量)的选择与年轻人的情感体验(即,年轻人对快乐和兴奋的经验抽样评价)和参与度(即,年轻人对注意力和努力的经验抽样评价)之间的关系。数据来自一个种族和民族多样化的 10-16 岁青少年样本(n=203;50%为女性),他们参加了针对服务不足的年轻人的九个不同的暑期 STEM 项目。多层次分析表明,选择和情感与即时参与独立且呈正相关。虽然参加的选择是即时参与的重要预测因素,但项目期间的积极情感体验可能会弥补与缺乏选择相关的任何参与度下降。总的来说,这些发现对研究人员、家长以及课外时间项目的教育者和管理者具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Examining Relationships among Choice, Affect, and Engagement in Summer STEM Programs.考察暑期 STEM 项目中选择、情感和参与度之间的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Jun;47(6):1178-1191. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0814-9. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
2
Out-of-school settings as a developmental context for children and youth.校外环境作为儿童和青少年的发展背景。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2005;33:43-77. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(05)80004-7.
3
Adapting a robotics program to enhance participation and interest in STEM among children with disabilities: a pilot study.改编一个机器人项目以提高残疾儿童对STEM的参与度和兴趣:一项试点研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Oct;12(7):694-704. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1229047. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
4
Examining youth and program predictors of engagement in out-of-school time programs.考察青少年和项目因素对参与课外时间项目的影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Oct;42(10):1557-72. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9814-3. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
5
Pathways to Youth Empowerment and Community Connectedness: A Study of Youth-Adult Partnership in Malaysian After-School, Co-Curricular Programs.促进青少年赋权和社区联系的途径:马来西亚课外、课程辅助活动中青年-成人伙伴关系研究。
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Aug;45(8):1638-51. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0320-2. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
6
Childhood experiences and undergraduate student interest in STEM disciplines: Attending to setting and activity type.儿童时期的经历与大学生对 STEM 学科的兴趣:关注环境和活动类型。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2023 Aug;1526(1):138-147. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15013. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
7
Factors influencing the uptake of Voluntary HIV Counseling and Testing among secondary school students in Arusha City, Tanzania: a cross sectional study.坦桑尼亚阿鲁沙市中学生自愿接受 HIV 咨询和检测的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 2;15:452. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1771-9.
8
Safe Schools? Transgender Youth's School Experiences and Perceptions of School Climate.安全的学校?跨性别青年的学校经历和对学校氛围的看法。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Aug;47(8):1731-1742. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0866-x. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
9
Youth's Initiations of Civic and Political Discussions in Class: Do Youth's Perceptions of Teachers' Behaviors Matter and Why?青少年在课堂上发起公民与政治讨论:青少年对教师行为的认知重要吗?为什么?
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Nov;45(11):2233-2245. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0525-z. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
10
Hospital-based, Multidisciplinary, youth mentoring and medical exposure program positively influences and reinforces health care career choice: "The Reach One Each One Program early Experience".基于医院的多学科青年指导与医学体验项目对医疗保健职业选择产生积极影响并强化这一选择:“一个影响一个项目早期体验”
Am J Surg. 2017 Apr;213(4):611-616. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Readdressing the Ongoing Challenge of Missing Data in Youth Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies: Meta-Analysis Update.重新审视青少年生态瞬时评估研究中持续存在的数据缺失挑战:荟萃分析更新
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e65710. doi: 10.2196/65710.
2
Avoiding Academic Burnout: Academic Factors That Enhance University Student Engagement.避免学术倦怠:提升大学生参与度的学术因素。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 30;13(12):989. doi: 10.3390/bs13120989.
3
Engagement in video and audio narratives: contrasting self-report and physiological measures.

本文引用的文献

1
Interest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education.兴趣至关重要:培养教育兴趣的重要性。
Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Oct;3(2):220-227. doi: 10.1177/2372732216655542. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
2
Examining youth and program predictors of engagement in out-of-school time programs.考察青少年和项目因素对参与课外时间项目的影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Oct;42(10):1557-72. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9814-3. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
3
More than attendance: the importance of after-school program quality.不止是出勤:课后项目质量的重要性。
参与视频和音频叙事:自我报告和生理测量的对比。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 9;10(1):11298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68253-2.
4
Experiencing and Learning About Emotions: A Longitudinal Analysis of Youth Program Participants.体验和学习情绪:青年项目参与者的纵向分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Aug;47(8):1684-1696. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0885-7. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
Am J Community Psychol. 2010 Jun;45(3-4):447-52. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9310-4.
4
Engagement in after-school programs as a predictor of social competence and academic performance.参与课外活动作为预测社交能力和学业成绩的指标。
Am J Community Psychol. 2010 Jun;45(3-4):325-37. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9314-0.
5
The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings.选择对内在动机及相关结果的影响:研究结果的荟萃分析
Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):270-300. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270.
6
Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs.数学与科学学习动机:对选择与信念之间联系的纵向考察。
Dev Psychol. 2006 Jan;42(1):70-83. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70.
7
Premature adolescent autonomy: parent disengagement and deviant peer process in the amplification of problem behaviour.青春期过早自主:父母疏离与不良同伴过程对问题行为的放大作用
J Adolesc. 2004 Oct;27(5):515-30. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.06.005.
8
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.自我决定理论与内在动机、社会发展和幸福感的促进
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68.
9
Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem.青少年-家庭互动中自主性和关联性的纵向评估作为青少年自我发展和自尊的预测因素
Child Dev. 1994 Feb;65(1):179-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00743.x.
10
A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences.关于某些课堂体验的动机理论。
J Educ Psychol. 1979 Feb;71(1):3-25.