Suppr超能文献

不同带状疱疹后神经痛治疗方法的止痛效果:网络荟萃分析。

Efficacy of Pain Relief in Different Postherpetic Neuralgia Therapies: A Network Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2018 Jan;21(1):19-32.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a nerve pain disease usually controlled by different therapies, i.e., topical therapies, antiepileptics, analgesics, antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-dementia drugs, antivirals, amitriptyline, fluphenazine, and magnesium sulfate. It is believed that different therapies may lead to different levels of pain relief.

OBJECTIVES

We proposed this study to compare the efficacy of PHN treatments.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review of the current literature. All relevant studies were retrieved from online databases. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used for pain relief measurement in different PHN therapies.

SETTING

A conventional meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis (NMA) were carried out together with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for each therapy calculated regarding their efficacy.

RESULTS

A pairwise meta-analysis suggested that 4 treatment classes, including topical therapies, antiepileptics, analgesics, and antidepressants, exhibited better pain relief results than placebo. Likewise, a NMA suggested that patients with 4 treatment classes exhibited significant improvements in pain scores compared to those with placebo.

LIMITATIONS

There is a lack of direct head-to-head comparisons of some treatments, especially for antivirals, anti-dementia drugs, and magnesium sulfate. Secondly, the specific agents belonging to the same class of therapies might exhibit different effects (gabapentin and carisbamate) with different mechanisms (opioids and ketamine) on reducing pain, and some agents were hard to find in literatures and were not involved in our study, which may influence our results.

CONCLUSIONS

Analgesics were preferable to other treatments with respect to pain relief for PHN, while antivirals appeared to be less effective than other therapies.

KEY WORDS

Postherpetic neuralgia, topical agents, antiepileptics, analgesics, antipsychotics, antidepressants.

摘要

背景

带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)是一种神经痛疾病,通常通过不同的治疗方法控制,如局部治疗、抗癫痫药、镇痛药、抗精神病药、抗抑郁药、抗痴呆药、抗病毒药、阿米替林、氟奋乃静和硫酸镁。不同的治疗方法可能会导致不同程度的疼痛缓解。

目的

我们提出这项研究是为了比较 PHN 治疗方法的疗效。

研究设计

我们对当前文献进行了系统回顾。从在线数据库中检索到所有相关研究。采用标准化均数差(SMD)衡量不同 PHN 治疗方法的止痛效果。

设置

同时进行常规荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析(NMA),并计算每种治疗方法的累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA),以评估其疗效。

结果

配对荟萃分析表明,包括局部治疗、抗癫痫药、镇痛药和抗抑郁药在内的 4 种治疗类别在止痛效果上优于安慰剂。同样,NMA 表明,与安慰剂相比,4 种治疗类别的患者疼痛评分有显著改善。

局限性

某些治疗方法缺乏直接的头对头比较,特别是抗病毒药、抗痴呆药和硫酸镁。其次,属于同一类治疗方法的特定药物可能具有不同的作用(加巴喷丁和卡马西平)和不同的作用机制(阿片类药物和氯胺酮)来减轻疼痛,有些药物在文献中难以找到,也未纳入我们的研究,这可能会影响我们的结果。

结论

在缓解 PHN 疼痛方面,镇痛药优于其他治疗方法,而抗病毒药似乎不如其他疗法有效。

关键词

带状疱疹后神经痛;局部制剂;抗癫痫药;镇痛药;抗精神病药;抗抑郁药。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验