• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

0.525%次氯酸钠和爱必肤对藻酸盐印模材料的消毒效果

Disinfectant Efficacy of 0.525% Sodium Hypochlorite and Epimax on Alginate Impression Material.

作者信息

Choudhury Gopal Krishna, Chitumalla Rajkiran, Manual Litto, Rajalbandi Santosh Kumar, Chauhan Mahinder Singh, Talukdar Pratim

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, e-mail:

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Rehabilitation, Prosthodontic Division, Quassim Private Colleges, Buraydah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):113-116. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2222.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2222
PMID:29358546
Abstract

AIM

Species of Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus, Actinomyces, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, and Candida are commonly seen in the oral cavity. Impression materials are commonly contaminated with microorganisms. The present study was conducted to assess the disinfection efficacy of Epimax and 0.525% sodium hypochlorite on alginate impression over a period of 10 minutes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics in the year 2015. An alginate impression material was prepared. For each bacteria species, 15 samples were used. Out of 15 samples, 3 were used by 0.525% sodium hypochlorite for disinfection for 5 minutes and 3 others for 10 minutes. Similarly, 3 samples were used by Epimax for 5 minutes and other 3 for 10 minutes. Three samples were used as controls. Each sample was polluted with Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus strains.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in P. aeruginosa and C. albicans after 5 minutes, whereas S. aureus showed significant difference (p < 0.05). Epimax was found to be more effective in removing S. aureus as compared with other disinfectants. Both Epimax and 0.525% sodium hypochlorite did not show significant difference against P. aeruginosa and C. albicans, whereas significant difference was found between both agents against S. aureus (p < 0.05). It was seen that Epimax eliminated S. aureus after 5 minutes and P. aeruginosa after 10 minutes and 99.8% C. albicans after 10 minutes. About 0.525% sodium hypochlorite eliminated 99.1% of C. albicans after 10 minutes, whereas 98.5 and 99% of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were eliminated after 10 minutes respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both Epimax and 0.525% sodium hypochlorite can disinfect the alginate impression material against C. albicans, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus strains. However, Epimax was found to be more effective against S. aureus as compared with 0.525% sodium hypochlorite.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Efficacy of disinfection of sodium hypo-chlorite and Epimax on alginate impression.

摘要

目的

口腔中常见的链球菌、大肠杆菌、葡萄球菌、放线菌、假单胞菌、克雷伯菌和念珠菌等菌种。印模材料常被微生物污染。本研究旨在评估Epimax和0.525%次氯酸钠在10分钟内对藻酸盐印模的消毒效果。

材料与方法

本研究于2015年在口腔修复科进行。制备了一种藻酸盐印模材料。对于每种细菌菌种,使用15个样本。在15个样本中,3个样本用0.525%次氯酸钠消毒5分钟,另外3个样本消毒10分钟。同样,3个样本用Epimax消毒5分钟,另外3个样本消毒10分钟。3个样本用作对照。每个样本用白色念珠菌、铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌菌株污染。

结果

5分钟后,铜绿假单胞菌和白色念珠菌无统计学差异,而金黄色葡萄球菌有显著差异(p<0.05)。与其他消毒剂相比,Epimax在去除金黄色葡萄球菌方面更有效。Epimax和0.525%次氯酸钠对铜绿假单胞菌和白色念珠菌均无显著差异,而两种制剂对金黄色葡萄球菌有显著差异(p<0.05)。结果显示,Epimax在5分钟后可消除金黄色葡萄球菌,10分钟后可消除铜绿假单胞菌,10分钟后可消除99.8%的白色念珠菌。约0.525%次氯酸钠在10分钟后可消除99.1%的白色念珠菌,而10分钟后分别可消除98.5%和99%的金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌。

结论

Epimax和0.525%次氯酸钠均可对藻酸盐印模材料进行消毒,以对抗白色念珠菌属、铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌菌株。然而,与0.525%次氯酸钠相比,Epimax对金黄色葡萄球菌更有效。

临床意义

次氯酸钠和Epimax对藻酸盐印模的消毒效果。

相似文献

1
Disinfectant Efficacy of 0.525% Sodium Hypochlorite and Epimax on Alginate Impression Material.0.525%次氯酸钠和爱必肤对藻酸盐印模材料的消毒效果
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):113-116. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2222.
2
Disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with chlorinated compounds.用含氯化合物对不可逆水胶体印模材料进行消毒。
SADJ. 2009 Jun;64(5):208, 210-2.
3
Effects of disinfectants on resilient denture-lining materials contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus sobrinus, and Candida albicans.消毒剂对被金黄色葡萄球菌、远缘链球菌和白色念珠菌污染的弹性义齿衬里材料的影响。
Quintessence Int. 2005 May;36(5):373-81.
4
Comparison of antimicrobial activities and compressive strength of alginate impression materials following disinfection procedure.消毒程序后藻酸盐印模材料的抗菌活性和抗压强度比较
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Jul 1;13(4):431-5. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1163.
5
Disinfection efficiency of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite: a pilot study.使用不同浓度次氯酸钠对不可逆水胶体印模的消毒效果:一项初步研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 May 1;8(4):27-34.
6
The effect of three different disinfection materials on alginate impression by spray method.三种不同消毒材料喷雾法对藻酸盐印模的影响
ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:695151. doi: 10.5402/2012/695151. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
7
Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions with sodium hypochlorite. Part I: Microbiology.用次氯酸钠对不可逆水胶体印模进行浸泡消毒。第一部分:微生物学。
Int J Prosthodont. 1994 May-Jun;7(3):234-8.
8
A microbiologic investigation following the disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid materials using the spray method.使用喷雾法对不可逆水胶体材料进行消毒后的微生物学调查。
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2009 Jul;37(7):471-7.
9
Antimicrobial activities of dental impression materials.牙科印模材料的抗菌活性。
Dent Mater. 1998 Nov;14(6):399-404. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00013-5.
10
[The microorganism count on impressions after their disinfection by submersion in sodium hypochlorite solutions].[次氯酸钠溶液浸泡消毒后印模上的微生物计数]
Stomatologiia (Mosk). 1998;77(1):48-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Sodium Hypochlorite, Neem Extract, and Microwave Radiation for Disinfection of Type IV Dental Stone.葡萄糖酸氯己定、次氯酸钠、印楝提取物和微波辐射用于消毒IV型牙科石膏的比较。
Eur J Dent. 2025 May;19(2):346-353. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788631. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
Efficacy and design requirements of UV light cabinets for disinfection of exchangeable non-sterilizable "dental objects".用于消毒可更换非无菌“牙科器械”的紫外线灯箱的功效和设计要求。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 13;13(1):19755. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45481-w.
3
Disinfection efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and glutaraldehyde and their effects on the dimensional stability and surface properties of dental impressions: a systematic review.
次氯酸钠和戊二醛的消毒效果及其对牙印模尺寸稳定性和表面性能的影响:系统评价。
PeerJ. 2023 Feb 20;11:e14868. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14868. eCollection 2023.
4
Disinfection Procedures and Their Effect on the Microorganism Colonization of Dental Impression Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.消毒程序及其对牙科印模材料微生物定植的影响:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;9(3):123. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9030123.
5
Potential application of novel technology developed for instant decontamination of personal protective equipment before the doffing step.新型技术在个人防护装备脱卸前即时消毒的潜在应用。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0250854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250854. eCollection 2021.