• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价结直肠癌筛查指南在一般风险成年人中的应用:总结当前全球建议。

Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Montreal (UdeM), and University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.

Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 7;24(1):124-138. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124
PMID:29358889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5757117/
Abstract

AIM

To summarize and compare worldwide colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations in order to identify similarities and disparities.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CENTRAL and ISI Web of knowledge identifying all average-risk CRC screening guideline publications within the last ten years and/or position statements published in the last 2 years. In addition, a hand-search of the webpages of National Gastroenterology Society websites, the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the BMJ Clinical Evidence website, Google and Google Scholar was performed.

RESULTS

Fifteen guidelines were identified. Six guidelines were published in North America, four in Europe, four in Asia and one from the World Gastroenterology Organization. The majority of guidelines recommend screening average-risk individuals between ages 50 and 75 using colonoscopy (every 10 years), or flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS, every 5 years) or fecal occult blood test (FOBT, mainly the Fecal Immunochemical Test, annually or biennially). Disparities throughout the different guidelines are found relating to the use of colonoscopy, rank order between test, screening intervals and optimal age ranges for screening.

CONCLUSION

Average risk individuals between 50 and 75 years should undergo CRC screening. Recommendations for optimal surveillance intervals, preferred tests/test cascade as well as the optimal timing when to start and stop screening differ regionally and should be considered for clinical decision making. Furthermore, local resource availability and patient preferences are important to increase CRC screening uptake, as any screening is better than none.

摘要

目的

总结和比较全球结直肠癌(CRC)筛查建议,以发现相似点和差异。

方法

使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Scopus、CENTRAL 和 ISI Web of Knowledge 进行系统文献检索,确定过去十年内所有普通风险 CRC 筛查指南出版物和/或过去两年内发布的立场声明。此外,还对手动搜索了国家胃肠病学会网站、国家指南清理中心、BMJ 临床证据网站、Google 和 Google Scholar 的网页。

结果

确定了 15 项指南。其中 6 项指南发表在北美,4 项在欧洲,4 项在亚洲,1 项来自世界胃肠病组织。大多数指南建议对 50 至 75 岁的普通风险个体进行筛查,使用结肠镜检查(每 10 年一次)、柔性乙状结肠镜检查(FS,每 5 年一次)或粪便潜血试验(FOBT,主要是粪便免疫化学试验,每年或每两年一次)。在不同的指南中发现了差异,涉及结肠镜检查的使用、测试的等级顺序、筛查间隔和筛查的最佳年龄范围。

结论

50 至 75 岁的普通风险个体应进行 CRC 筛查。关于最佳监测间隔、首选测试/测试级联以及开始和停止筛查的最佳时间的建议因地区而异,应考虑用于临床决策。此外,当地资源的可用性和患者的偏好对于提高 CRC 筛查的参与度很重要,因为任何筛查都比没有筛查要好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/5757117/7cf75ad3ae94/WJG-24-124-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/5757117/7cf75ad3ae94/WJG-24-124-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/5757117/7cf75ad3ae94/WJG-24-124-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations.系统评价结直肠癌筛查指南在一般风险成年人中的应用:总结当前全球建议。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 7;24(1):124-138. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124.
2
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于一般风险人群结直肠癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD009276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2.
3
Acceptability of alternative technologies compared with faecal immunochemical test and/or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review.替代技术在结直肠癌筛查中与粪便免疫化学试验和/或结肠镜检查的可接受性比较:系统评价。
J Med Screen. 2023 Mar;30(1):14-27. doi: 10.1177/09691413221109999. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
4
[Population screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review].[结直肠癌的人群筛查:一项系统评价]
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Oct;27(8):450-9. doi: 10.1016/s0210-5705(03)70502-0.
5
Improving animated instructional videos for colorectal cancer screening: An application of learner verification and revision.改进结直肠癌筛查的动画教学视频:学习者验证与修订的应用
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf020.
6
Adherence to colonoscopy in cascade screening of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠癌级联筛查中结肠镜检查的依从性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Apr;37(4):620-631. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15762. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
7
Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult.使用便潜血试验(Hemoccult)筛查结直肠癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD001216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001216.pub2.
8
Screening strategies for colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the evidence.结直肠癌的筛查策略:证据的系统评价
Can J Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;15(10):647-60. doi: 10.1155/2001/284746.
9
Comparative Performance of Common Fecal Immunochemical Tests : A Cross-Sectional Study.常见粪便免疫化学检测的比较性能:一项横断面研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Oct;177(10):1350-1360. doi: 10.7326/M24-0080. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights from age-stratified endoscopic detection metrics support initiating colorectal cancer screening at age 45.来自年龄分层的内镜检测指标的见解支持在45岁时开始进行结直肠癌筛查。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 19;25(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04213-2.
2
Predictors of Colon Cancer Screening Among the Saudi Population at Primary Healthcare Settings in Riyadh.利雅得初级医疗保健机构中沙特人群结肠癌筛查的预测因素
Curr Oncol. 2025 Apr 22;32(5):243. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32050243.
3
Evaluating the implementation of colorectal cancer screening practices at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Riyadh.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal cancer screening: An updated review of the available options.结直肠癌筛查:现有可选方案的最新综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul 28;23(28):5086-5096. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5086.
2
Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.结直肠癌筛查方法的有效性:网络荟萃分析。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Dec;16(4):252-263. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
3
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
评估利雅得阿卜杜勒-阿齐兹国王医疗城的结直肠癌筛查实践的实施情况。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Apr;14(4):1352-1358. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1512_24. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
4
Optimising colorectal cancer screening strategies and target populations in budget-constrained regions through cost-effectiveness analysis: a case from eastern China.通过成本效益分析优化预算受限地区的结直肠癌筛查策略和目标人群:来自中国东部的一个案例
BMJ Open. 2025 May 2;15(5):e087216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087216.
5
Survival Tree Analysis of Interactions Among Factors Associated With Colorectal Cancer Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.2型糖尿病患者结直肠癌风险相关因素间相互作用的生存树分析:回顾性队列研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Apr 29;11:e62756. doi: 10.2196/62756.
6
Screening outcomes at second FIT screening in individuals with a first time negative FIT-result or low-risk adenomas: Results from a nationwide FIT screening program.首次粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)结果为阴性或低风险腺瘤患者第二次FIT筛查的结果:一项全国性FIT筛查项目的结果
Int J Cancer. 2025 Aug 15;157(4):698-708. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35419. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
7
Single-round performance of colorectal cancer screening programs: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.结直肠癌筛查项目的单轮效果:随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 21;23(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03948-9.
8
Investigation of the expression level of methylated septin 9 gene and serological carcinoembryonic antigen to diagnose colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis study.甲基化septin 9基因表达水平及血清癌胚抗原用于诊断结直肠癌的研究。一项Meta分析。
Prz Gastroenterol. 2024;16(4):368-379. doi: 10.5114/pg.2024.145381. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
9
Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in Reducing Colorectal Cancer Mortality.韩国国家癌症筛查计划在降低结直肠癌死亡率方面的有效性。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 23;16(24):4278. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244278.
10
Potential for enhancing efficacy of screening colonoscopy by lowering starting ages and extending screening intervals: A modelling study for Germany.通过降低起始年龄和延长筛查间隔来提高结肠镜筛查效果的潜力:德国的一项建模研究
Int J Cancer. 2025 Jun 15;156(12):2303-2310. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35322. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
结直肠癌筛查:美国多学会专家组对医生和患者的建议。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):1016-1030. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.174. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
4
Colorectal Cancer in African Americans: An Update.非裔美国人的结直肠癌:最新进展
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 28;7(7):e185. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2016.36.
5
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查策略的益处、负担及危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2595-609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6828.
6
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
7
Rationale and design of the European Polyp Surveillance (EPoS) trials.欧洲息肉监测(EPoS)试验的原理与设计
Endoscopy. 2016 Jun;48(6):571-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-104116. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
8
Consensus on the Prevention, Screening, Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Tumors in China: Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, October 14-15, 2011, Shanghai, China.《中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)》解读:中国胃肠病学会,2011年10月14 - 15日,中国上海 。 需注意,你提供的原文内容似乎不太准确,推测你可能是想给出关于中国结直肠癌防治共识相关的英文内容,但这个英文原文不太能对应上常见的规范名称。我按照纠正后的名称为你翻译了,若有偏差请指出。 如果按照你提供的原文准确翻译是:《中国结直肠癌预防、筛查、早期诊断和治疗的共识:中国胃肠病学会,2011年10月14 - 15日,中国上海》 。
Gastrointest Tumors. 2014 Jun;1(2):53-75. doi: 10.1159/000362585. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
National Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Saudi Arabia with strength of recommendations and quality of evidence.沙特阿拉伯结直肠癌筛查国家指南,附推荐强度和证据质量说明。
Ann Saudi Med. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):189-95. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2015.189.
10
Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.结直肠癌筛查策略的成本效益
Cancer Control. 2015 Apr;22(2):248-58. doi: 10.1177/107327481502200219.