Suppr超能文献

微创外科与开腹肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石病的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Minimally invasive surgery versus open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: A systematic review and meta analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The People's Hospital of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei, 443000, China.

Department of Operating Room, Jingzhou Central Hospital, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434000, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.038. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis can be performed by following an open approach or a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach. MIS is associated with theoretical advantages, but there is no consensus regarding to the best treatment method for hepatolithiasis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of MIS hepatectomy compared with those of open hepatectomy in hepatolithiasis patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. The data were analyzed with Stata version 12.0 software. Meta-regression analysis was used to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Egger's tests and Begg's funnel plots were employed to evaluate the publication biases.

RESULTS

In total, 12 nonrandomized controlled trials were identified. Compared with open hepatectomy, the volume of intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in MIS hepatectomy (SMD = -0.226, P = 0.000). The intraoperative blood transfusion rate was also lower in MIS hepatectomy (RR = 0.569, P = 0.003). A shorter length of postoperative hospital stay was noted with MIS hepatectomy (SMD = -0.537, P = 0.000). MIS hepatectomy resulted in a lower rate of postoperative complications than open hepatectomy (RR = 0.595, P = 0.000). However, MIS hepatectomy resulted in a longer operation time (SMD = 0.473, P = 0.005). No significant differences were noted between MIS and open hepatectomy in the initial stone clearance rate (RR = 1.33, P = 0.218), the final stone clearance rate (RR = 1.040, P = 0.131), the stone recurrence rate (RR = 0.558, P = 0.072) or the cholangitis recurrence rate (RR = 0.610, P = 0.285).

CONCLUSIONS

MIS hepatectomy is a safe approach for hepatolithiasis patients. MIS hepatectomy significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, postoperative hospital stay time and complications. The stone clearance and recurrence rates were similar for MIS hepatectomy and open hepatectomy. Additional well-designed randomized controlled trials and Western studies are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

目的

肝内胆管结石的治疗可以通过开腹手术或微创手术(MIS)进行。MIS 具有理论优势,但对于肝内胆管结石的最佳治疗方法尚无共识。本研究的目的是评估 MIS 肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石患者的临床疗效。

方法

通过 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库进行系统文献检索。使用 Stata 版本 12.0 软件对数据进行分析。Meta 回归分析用于探索潜在的异质性来源。采用 Egger 检验和 Begg 漏斗图评估发表偏倚。

结果

共纳入 12 项非随机对照试验。与开腹肝切除术相比,MIS 肝切除术中的术中出血量明显减少(SMD=-0.226,P=0.000)。MIS 肝切除术中的术中输血率也较低(RR=0.569,P=0.003)。MIS 肝切除术后的住院时间较短(SMD=-0.537,P=0.000)。MIS 肝切除术后的并发症发生率低于开腹肝切除术(RR=0.595,P=0.000)。然而,MIS 肝切除的手术时间较长(SMD=0.473,P=0.005)。MIS 与开腹肝切除在初始结石清除率(RR=1.33,P=0.218)、最终结石清除率(RR=1.040,P=0.131)、结石复发率(RR=0.558,P=0.072)或胆管炎复发率(RR=0.610,P=0.285)方面无显著差异。

结论

MIS 肝切除术是治疗肝内胆管结石患者的一种安全方法。MIS 肝切除术可显著减少术中出血量、输血、术后住院时间和并发症。MIS 肝切除术与开腹肝切除术的结石清除率和复发率相似。需要更多设计良好的随机对照试验和西方研究来证实这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验