Human Performance Laboratory, Directorate of Sport, Exercise, and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Feb;32(2):520-527. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002327.
Dos'Santos, T, Thomas, C, Jones, PA, and Comfort, P. Asymmetries in isometric force-time characteristics are not detrimental to change of direction speed. J Strength Cond Res 32(2): 520-527, 2018-The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of between-limb asymmetries in isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) force-time characteristics on change of direction speed (CODS). Twenty multisport collegiate athletes (mean ± SD: age: 21.0 ± 1.9 years; mass: 78.7 ± 8.9 kg; and height: 1.77 ± 0.04 m) performed 3 unilateral stance IMTP trials per limb and 3 modified 505 CODS trials each side to establish imbalances between left and right and dominant (D) and nondominant (ND) limbs. Limb dominance was defined as the limb that produced the highest isometric force-time value or faster CODS performance. Paired sample t-tests and Hedges g effect sizes revealed no significant differences in IMTP force-time characteristics and CODS performance between left and right limbs (p > 0.05, g ≤ 0.37). However, significant differences were observed between D and ND limbs for all IMTP force-time characteristics and CODS performance (p < 0.001, g = 0.39-0.73). No significant correlations were observed between IMTP asymmetries and CODS asymmetry (p ≥ 0.380, r ≤ -0.35), and no significant differences were observed in CODS performance between athletes of lesser and greater IMTP asymmetries (p ≥ 0.10, g ≤ 0.76). Poor percentage agreements (40-60%) between like-for-like classifications of asymmetry (i.e., either both asymmetrical or both balanced) for CODS and IMTP force-time characteristics were demonstrated. Asymmetries in IMTP force-time characteristics and CODS performance were present; however, greater IMTP asymmetries had no detrimental impact on CODS performance and did not equate to greater asymmetries in CODS performance. Therefore, collegiate athletes with asymmetries within the range reported within this study (≤13%) should not experience detriments to CODS or faster performance from that limb during 180° turns.
多斯桑托斯,T,托马斯,C,琼斯,PA,和舒适,P。等速向心收缩力-时程特征的不对称性不会对变向速度产生不利影响。J 力量与调节研究 32(2):520-527,2018-本研究的目的是确定等速大腿中部拉伸(IMTP)力-时程特征的两腿间不对称性对变向速度(CODS)的影响。20 名多运动大学生运动员(平均±SD:年龄:21.0±1.9 岁;体重:78.7±8.9kg;身高:1.77±0.04m)每侧进行 3 次单侧站立 IMTP 试验和 3 次改良的 505 CODS 试验,以确定左、右和优势(D)和非优势(ND)肢体之间的不平衡。肢体优势定义为产生最高等速力-时值或更快 CODS 表现的肢体。配对样本 t 检验和 Hedges g 效应量显示,左、右腿的 IMTP 力-时特征和 CODS 表现无显著差异(p>0.05,g≤0.37)。然而,D 和 ND 肢体之间的所有 IMTP 力-时特征和 CODS 表现均存在显著差异(p<0.001,g=0.39-0.73)。IMTP 不对称性与 CODS 不对称性之间无显著相关性(p≥0.380,r≤-0.35),并且在 IMTP 不对称性较小和较大的运动员之间,CODS 表现无显著差异(p≥0.10,g≤0.76)。在 CODS 和 IMTP 力-时特征的相似分类(即,两者均不对称或两者均平衡)之间,显示出较差的百分比一致性(40-60%)。IMTP 力-时特征和 CODS 表现存在不对称性;然而,更大的 IMTP 不对称性对 CODS 表现没有不利影响,也不等同于 CODS 表现更大的不对称性。因此,在本研究报告的范围内(≤13%)存在不对称性的大学生运动员不应在 180°转弯过程中因该肢体而感到 CODS 或更快表现的不利影响。