Hammami Rania, Jdidi Jihen, Mroua Fakher, Kallel Rahma, Hentati Mourad, Abid Leila, Kammoun Samir
Hedi Chaker Hospital, Cardiology Department, Sfax, Tunisia.
Hedi Chaker Hospital, Epidemiology Department, Sfax, Tunisia.
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Jan;37(1):41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2017.05.012. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
The GRACE and TIMI scores have been well validated for assessment of prognosis in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). However, their value in predicting coronary artery disease (CAD) has been little studied. We aimed to assess the relationship between these scores and the extent of coronary disease.
We analyzed 238 consecutive patients admitted for NSTE-ACS and undergoing a coronary angiogram during hospitalization. The severity of CAD was assessed using the SYNTAX score. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% stenosis in the left main or ≥70% stenosis in other vessels. Severe CAD was defined as a SYNTAX score >32. The Pearson test was used to assess the correlation between scores.
The SYNTAX score was higher in patients at high risk (GRACE score: p<0.001 and TIMI score: p=0.001). Moreover, there was a significant positive correlation between the GRACE and SYNTAX scores (r=0.23, p<0.001) as well as between TIMI and SYNTAX (r=0.2, p=0.002). Both clinical scores can predict obstructive CAD moderately well (area under the curve [AUC] for GRACE score: 0.599, p=0.015; TIMI score: AUC 0.639, p=0.001) but not severe disease. A GRACE score of 120 and a TIMI score of 2 were predictive of obstructive CAD with, respectively, a sensitivity of 57% and 75.7% and a specificity of 61.8% and 47.9%.
The GRACE and TIMI scores correlate moderately with the extent of coronary disease assessed by the SYNTAX score. They can predict obstructive CAD but not severe disease.
GRACE和TIMI评分在评估非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)的预后方面已得到充分验证。然而,它们在预测冠状动脉疾病(CAD)方面的价值鲜有研究。我们旨在评估这些评分与冠状动脉疾病程度之间的关系。
我们分析了238例因NSTE-ACS入院并在住院期间接受冠状动脉造影的连续患者。使用SYNTAX评分评估CAD的严重程度。阻塞性CAD定义为左主干狭窄≥50%或其他血管狭窄≥70%。严重CAD定义为SYNTAX评分>32。采用Pearson检验评估评分之间的相关性。
高危患者的SYNTAX评分更高(GRACE评分:p<0.001;TIMI评分:p=0.001)。此外,GRACE评分与SYNTAX评分之间存在显著正相关(r=0.23,p<0.001),TIMI评分与SYNTAX评分之间也存在显著正相关(r=0.2,p=0.002)。两种临床评分都能较好地预测阻塞性CAD(GRACE评分的曲线下面积[AUC]:0.599,p=0.015;TIMI评分:AUC 0.639,p=0.001),但对严重疾病的预测效果不佳。GRACE评分120分和TIMI评分2分可预测阻塞性CAD,敏感性分别为57%和75.7%,特异性分别为61.8%和47.9%。
GRACE和TIMI评分与通过SYNTAX评分评估的冠状动脉疾病程度中度相关。它们可以预测阻塞性CAD,但不能预测严重疾病。